Safety and Depth of Sedation With Ketamine Alone Versus Ketamine With Midazolam in Pediatric Fracture Reduction: A Retrospective Chart Review.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kimberly Wells, Vincent Calleo
{"title":"Safety and Depth of Sedation With Ketamine Alone Versus Ketamine With Midazolam in Pediatric Fracture Reduction: A Retrospective Chart Review.","authors":"Kimberly Wells, Vincent Calleo","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Pediatric patients with extremity fractures often require sedation for fracture reduction in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Although orthopedic literature suggests combination sedation regimens may be more effective for fracture reduction, some pediatric literature suggests adverse events are more frequent. The primary objective of this study is to determine the comparable depth of sedation and incidence of adverse events when intravenous ketamine is used alone versus with midazolam for pediatric procedural sedation and orthopedic fracture reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients 2-18 years old who underwent sedation for fracture reduction in the PED at a single level 1 trauma center over a 2-year period. Medical records were reviewed, and occurrence of adverse events, depth of sedation (Ramsey score), midazolam dose, total ketamine administration, opiate administration, total sedation time, and time to PED discharge were compared in patients who received ketamine alone versus those who received ketamine with midazolam. Logistic regression models were adjusted to evaluate for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant increase in the occurrence of hypoxia with coadministration of midazolam (5% vs 0%). When hypoxia occurred, it was mild and resolved with repositioning or administration of supplemental oxygen. Length of sedation was increased in sedations with coadministration of benzodiazepines by approximately 3.5 minutes. Time to PED discharge was not significantly different. There was no significant difference in depth of sedation, ketamine dose administered, end-tidal CO2 measurements, administration of positive pressure ventilation, vomiting, agitation, or overall occurrence of adverse events. No patients developed apnea or laryngospasm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed a low rate of adverse events in pediatric sedation for orthopedic reduction with ketamine alone or ketamine with midazolam. There was an increased occurrence of hypoxia with coadministration of midazolam and an increase in the length of sedation. This study showed no difference in depth of sedation based on Ramsay scores when midazolam was coadministered. Information on the orthopedic reduction and provider satisfaction was not collected.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: Pediatric patients with extremity fractures often require sedation for fracture reduction in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Although orthopedic literature suggests combination sedation regimens may be more effective for fracture reduction, some pediatric literature suggests adverse events are more frequent. The primary objective of this study is to determine the comparable depth of sedation and incidence of adverse events when intravenous ketamine is used alone versus with midazolam for pediatric procedural sedation and orthopedic fracture reduction.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients 2-18 years old who underwent sedation for fracture reduction in the PED at a single level 1 trauma center over a 2-year period. Medical records were reviewed, and occurrence of adverse events, depth of sedation (Ramsey score), midazolam dose, total ketamine administration, opiate administration, total sedation time, and time to PED discharge were compared in patients who received ketamine alone versus those who received ketamine with midazolam. Logistic regression models were adjusted to evaluate for potential confounders.

Results: There was a statistically significant increase in the occurrence of hypoxia with coadministration of midazolam (5% vs 0%). When hypoxia occurred, it was mild and resolved with repositioning or administration of supplemental oxygen. Length of sedation was increased in sedations with coadministration of benzodiazepines by approximately 3.5 minutes. Time to PED discharge was not significantly different. There was no significant difference in depth of sedation, ketamine dose administered, end-tidal CO2 measurements, administration of positive pressure ventilation, vomiting, agitation, or overall occurrence of adverse events. No patients developed apnea or laryngospasm.

Conclusions: This study showed a low rate of adverse events in pediatric sedation for orthopedic reduction with ketamine alone or ketamine with midazolam. There was an increased occurrence of hypoxia with coadministration of midazolam and an increase in the length of sedation. This study showed no difference in depth of sedation based on Ramsay scores when midazolam was coadministered. Information on the orthopedic reduction and provider satisfaction was not collected.

小儿骨折复位术中单用氯胺酮与氯胺酮联合咪达唑仑的安全性和镇静深度:回顾性病历分析
研究目的:四肢骨折的儿科患者在儿科急诊室(PED)接受骨折复位治疗时通常需要使用镇静剂。尽管骨科文献表明联合镇静方案可能对骨折复位更有效,但一些儿科文献表明不良反应发生率更高。本研究的主要目的是确定在儿科手术镇静和骨科骨折复位中单独使用氯胺酮与联合使用咪达唑仑时镇静深度和不良事件发生率的可比性:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是在一家一级创伤中心接受镇静治疗的 2-18 岁儿科患者,他们在两年内接受了 PED 骨折复位术。研究人员回顾了病历,并比较了单用氯胺酮与氯胺酮联合咪达唑仑患者的不良事件发生率、镇静深度(拉姆齐评分)、咪达唑仑剂量、氯胺酮总用量、阿片类药物用量、总镇静时间和 PED 出院时间。对逻辑回归模型进行了调整,以评估潜在的混杂因素:在联合使用咪达唑仑的情况下,缺氧发生率有明显增加(5% 对 0%)。发生缺氧时,缺氧程度较轻,调整体位或补充氧气后即可缓解。联合使用苯二氮卓类药物的镇静时间延长了约 3.5 分钟。PED 出院时间无明显差异。镇静深度、氯胺酮给药剂量、潮气末二氧化碳测量值、正压通气的使用、呕吐、躁动或不良事件的总体发生率均无明显差异。没有患者出现呼吸暂停或喉痉挛:这项研究表明,在使用氯胺酮单独或氯胺酮联合咪达唑仑进行骨科减容的儿科镇静治疗中,不良反应发生率较低。联合使用咪达唑仑会增加缺氧发生率,并延长镇静时间。这项研究显示,根据拉姆斯评分,联合使用咪达唑仑时镇静深度没有差异。本研究未收集有关矫形减痛和提供者满意度的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信