Efficacy of ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone regimen in daratumumab-exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: A retrospective analysis

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Dominik Fric, Martin Stork, Ivanna Boichuk, Viera Sandecka, Zdenek Adam, Marta Krejci, Eva Ondrouskova, Anna Fidrichova, Lenka Radova, Zdenka Knechtova, Marie Jarosova, Ludek Pour
{"title":"Efficacy of ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone regimen in daratumumab-exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: A retrospective analysis","authors":"Dominik Fric,&nbsp;Martin Stork,&nbsp;Ivanna Boichuk,&nbsp;Viera Sandecka,&nbsp;Zdenek Adam,&nbsp;Marta Krejci,&nbsp;Eva Ondrouskova,&nbsp;Anna Fidrichova,&nbsp;Lenka Radova,&nbsp;Zdenka Knechtova,&nbsp;Marie Jarosova,&nbsp;Ludek Pour","doi":"10.1111/ejh.14292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We performed retrospective analysis of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients previously exposed to daratumumab treated with ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (IRd) regimen in real clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate efficacy of IRd in these patients and select a subset of patients that would benefit from this treatment the most. In total, we analyzed 43 daratumumab-exposed RRMM patients treated in our center. Minimal response or better was achieved by 53.5% of patients from the cohort. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.56 months (95% CI: 2.56, 8.03) and median overall survival (OS) was 28.92 months (95% CI: 5.4, NR). Duration of response (DOR) was evaluable in 28 patients and reached a median of 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.85, NR). Next, we evaluated hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS. There was improved OS in patients that were not-triple refractory or worse (HR = 0.39, 95%Cl (0.14; 1.10), <i>p</i> = .07) and in patients, that had less than three previous lines of treatment (LOT) (HR = 0.13, 95%Cl (0.03; 0.6) <i>p</i> = .003). Similar to OS, there was improved PFS in patients, that were not triple-refractory or worse (HR = 0.52, 95%Cl (0.25; 1.10), <i>p</i> = .08). We concluded, that the best survival benefit for RRMM patients pretreated with daratumumab to IRd regimen was observed in patients that were not triple-refractory and had less than three previous lines of treatment (LOT). The DOR in these patients was 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.85, NR).</p>","PeriodicalId":11955,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Haematology","volume":"113 6","pages":"810-816"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejh.14292","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejh.14292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We performed retrospective analysis of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients previously exposed to daratumumab treated with ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (IRd) regimen in real clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate efficacy of IRd in these patients and select a subset of patients that would benefit from this treatment the most. In total, we analyzed 43 daratumumab-exposed RRMM patients treated in our center. Minimal response or better was achieved by 53.5% of patients from the cohort. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.56 months (95% CI: 2.56, 8.03) and median overall survival (OS) was 28.92 months (95% CI: 5.4, NR). Duration of response (DOR) was evaluable in 28 patients and reached a median of 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.85, NR). Next, we evaluated hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS. There was improved OS in patients that were not-triple refractory or worse (HR = 0.39, 95%Cl (0.14; 1.10), p = .07) and in patients, that had less than three previous lines of treatment (LOT) (HR = 0.13, 95%Cl (0.03; 0.6) p = .003). Similar to OS, there was improved PFS in patients, that were not triple-refractory or worse (HR = 0.52, 95%Cl (0.25; 1.10), p = .08). We concluded, that the best survival benefit for RRMM patients pretreated with daratumumab to IRd regimen was observed in patients that were not triple-refractory and had less than three previous lines of treatment (LOT). The DOR in these patients was 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.85, NR).

Abstract Image

伊沙佐米、来那度胺、地塞米松方案在达拉单抗暴露的复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中的疗效:回顾性分析
我们对曾在实际临床实践中接受过达拉单抗与伊沙佐米、来那度胺、地塞米松(IRd)方案治疗的复发性/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者进行了回顾性分析。我们的目的是评估IRd在这些患者中的疗效,并筛选出从这种治疗中获益最多的患者亚群。我们总共分析了在本中心接受治疗的 43 例达拉单抗暴露的 RRMM 患者。队列中53.5%的患者达到或优于最小反应。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为4.56个月(95% CI:2.56, 8.03),中位总生存期(OS)为28.92个月(95% CI:5.4, NR)。28例患者的反应持续时间(DOR)可评估,中位数为21.3个月(95% CI:6.85,NR)。接下来,我们评估了OS和PFS的危险比(HR)。非三线难治性或更差的患者(HR = 0.39,95%Cl (0.14; 1.10),P = .07)和既往接受过少于三线治疗(LOT)的患者(HR = 0.13,95%Cl (0.03; 0.6) P = .003)的OS有所改善。与OS类似,未接受三线治疗或治疗效果更差的患者的PFS也有所改善(HR = 0.52,95%Cl (0.25; 1.10),p = .08)。我们得出的结论是,接受达拉单抗和IRd方案预处理的RRMM患者的最佳生存获益出现在非三线耐药和既往接受过少于三线治疗(LOT)的患者中。这些患者的DOR为21.3个月(95% CI:6.85,NR)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Haematology is an international journal for communication of basic and clinical research in haematology. The journal welcomes manuscripts on molecular, cellular and clinical research on diseases of the blood, vascular and lymphatic tissue, and on basic molecular and cellular research related to normal development and function of the blood, vascular and lymphatic tissue. The journal also welcomes reviews on clinical haematology and basic research, case reports, and clinical pictures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信