Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors, Dulaglutide, and Risk for Dementia : A Population-Based Cohort Study.

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.7326/M23-3220
Bin Hong, Sungho Bea, Hwa Yeon Ko, Woo Jung Kim, Young Min Cho, Ju-Young Shin
{"title":"Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors, Dulaglutide, and Risk for Dementia : A Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Bin Hong, Sungho Bea, Hwa Yeon Ko, Woo Jung Kim, Young Min Cho, Ju-Young Shin","doi":"10.7326/M23-3220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) may have neuroprotective effects in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, their comparative effectiveness in preventing dementia remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the risk for dementia between SGLT2 inhibitors and dulaglutide (a GLP-1 RA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Target trial emulation study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Nationwide health care data of South Korea obtained from the National Health Insurance Service between 2010 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients aged 60 years or older who have T2D and are initiating treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors or dulaglutide.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was the presumed clinical onset of dementia. The date of onset was defined as the year before the date of dementia diagnosis, assuming that the time between the onset of dementia and diagnosis was 1 year. The 5-year risk ratios and risk differences comparing SGLT2 inhibitors with dulaglutide were estimated in a 1:2 propensity score-matched cohort adjusted for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 12 489 patients initiating SGLT2 inhibitor treatment (51.9% dapagliflozin and 48.1% empagliflozin) and 1075 patients initiating dulaglutide treatment were included. In the matched cohort, over a median follow-up of 4.4 years, the primary outcome event occurred in 69 participants in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 43 in the dulaglutide group. The estimated risk difference was -0.91 percentage point (95% CI, -2.45 to 0.63 percentage point), and the estimated risk ratio was 0.81 (CI, 0.56 to 1.16).</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Residual confounding is possible; there was no adjustment for hemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> levels or duration of diabetes; the study is not representative of newer drugs, including more effective GLP-1 RAs; and the onset of dementia was not measured directly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under conventional statistical criteria, a risk for dementia between 2.5 percentage points lower and 0.6 percentage point greater for SGLT2 inhibitors than for dulaglutide was estimated to be highly compatible with the data from this study. However, whether these findings generalize to newer GLP-1 RAs is uncertain. Thus, further studies incorporating newer drugs within these drug classes and better addressing residual confounding are required.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>Ministry of Food and Drug Safety of South Korea.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/M23-3220","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Both sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) may have neuroprotective effects in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, their comparative effectiveness in preventing dementia remains uncertain.

Objective: To compare the risk for dementia between SGLT2 inhibitors and dulaglutide (a GLP-1 RA).

Design: Target trial emulation study.

Setting: Nationwide health care data of South Korea obtained from the National Health Insurance Service between 2010 and 2022.

Patients: Patients aged 60 years or older who have T2D and are initiating treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors or dulaglutide.

Measurements: The primary outcome was the presumed clinical onset of dementia. The date of onset was defined as the year before the date of dementia diagnosis, assuming that the time between the onset of dementia and diagnosis was 1 year. The 5-year risk ratios and risk differences comparing SGLT2 inhibitors with dulaglutide were estimated in a 1:2 propensity score-matched cohort adjusted for confounders.

Results: Overall, 12 489 patients initiating SGLT2 inhibitor treatment (51.9% dapagliflozin and 48.1% empagliflozin) and 1075 patients initiating dulaglutide treatment were included. In the matched cohort, over a median follow-up of 4.4 years, the primary outcome event occurred in 69 participants in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 43 in the dulaglutide group. The estimated risk difference was -0.91 percentage point (95% CI, -2.45 to 0.63 percentage point), and the estimated risk ratio was 0.81 (CI, 0.56 to 1.16).

Limitation: Residual confounding is possible; there was no adjustment for hemoglobin A1c levels or duration of diabetes; the study is not representative of newer drugs, including more effective GLP-1 RAs; and the onset of dementia was not measured directly.

Conclusion: Under conventional statistical criteria, a risk for dementia between 2.5 percentage points lower and 0.6 percentage point greater for SGLT2 inhibitors than for dulaglutide was estimated to be highly compatible with the data from this study. However, whether these findings generalize to newer GLP-1 RAs is uncertain. Thus, further studies incorporating newer drugs within these drug classes and better addressing residual confounding are required.

Primary funding source: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety of South Korea.

葡萄糖钠转运体 2 抑制剂、度拉鲁肽与痴呆症风险 :基于人群的队列研究。
背景:钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2(SGLT2)抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)都可能对 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者产生神经保护作用。然而,它们在预防痴呆症方面的比较效果仍不确定:比较 SGLT2 抑制剂和度拉鲁肽(一种 GLP-1 RA)的痴呆风险:设计:目标试验模拟研究:2010年至2022年期间从韩国国民健康保险服务机构获得的韩国全国医疗保健数据:患者:60 岁或以上患有 T2D 并开始接受 SGLT2 抑制剂或度拉鲁肽治疗的患者:主要结果是推测的痴呆症临床发病日期。发病日期定义为痴呆诊断日期的前一年,假设痴呆发病与诊断之间的时间间隔为 1 年。在1:2倾向得分匹配队列中估算了SGLT2抑制剂与度拉鲁肽的5年风险比和风险差异,并对混杂因素进行了调整:总计纳入了12 489名开始接受SGLT2抑制剂治疗的患者(51.9%为达帕格列净,48.1%为恩格列净)和1075名开始接受度拉鲁肽治疗的患者。在中位随访 4.4 年的匹配队列中,SGLT2 抑制剂组有 69 名患者发生了主要结局事件,而度拉鲁肽组有 43 名患者发生了主要结局事件。估计风险差异为-0.91个百分点(95% CI,-2.45至0.63个百分点),估计风险比为0.81(CI,0.56至1.16):局限性:可能存在残余混杂因素;未对血红蛋白A1c水平或糖尿病持续时间进行调整;该研究不代表更新的药物,包括更有效的GLP-1 RAs;未直接测量痴呆症的发病时间:根据传统的统计标准,SGLT2 抑制剂比度拉鲁肽的痴呆风险低 2.5 个百分点到高 0.6 个百分点,这与本研究的数据高度吻合。然而,这些发现是否能推广到较新的 GLP-1 RAs 尚不确定。因此,需要进一步研究这些药物类别中的新药,并更好地处理残余混杂因素:主要资金来源:韩国食品药品安全部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信