Using personal health records for medication continuity during transition of care: An observational study.

Martina Francis, Peter Francis, Meredith Makeham, Melissa T Baysari, Asad E Patanwala, Jonathan Penm
{"title":"Using <i>personal health records</i> for medication continuity during transition of care: An observational study.","authors":"Martina Francis, Peter Francis, Meredith Makeham, Melissa T Baysari, Asad E Patanwala, Jonathan Penm","doi":"10.1177/18333583241270215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> National Personal Health Records (PHRs) have been proposed to improve the transfer of medication-related information during transition of care. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the concordance between the medications captured in the Australian national PHR, My Health Record (MyHR), and the pharmacist obtained best possible medication history (BPMH) for patients upon hospital admission. <b>Method:</b> This prospective observational study used a convenience sample of hospital patients. For newly admitted patients, the investigating pharmacist obtained a BPMH and then compared it to the medication list captured in MyHR. Upon comparison, the medications were categorised into either complete match, partial match or mismatch. Medications with a complete or partial match were grouped together. Medications with deviations were then assessed for risk based on their potential consequence, and reported descriptively. A multivariable logistic regression was conducted to assess the factors associated with a drug being mismatched. <b>Results:</b> A total of 82 patients were recruited, with a cumulative total of 1,207 medications documented. Of the 1,207 medications, 714 (59.2%) medications were documented as a complete/partial match. The remaining 493 (40.8%) medications were mismatched. Of the 493 mismatched medications, 442 (89.7%) were deemed low-risk deviations and 51 (10.3%) were deemed high-risk. A medication was more likely to be mismatched, rather than completely/partially matched, if it was a regular non-prescription medication, or \"when-required\" prescription medication, or \"when required\" non-prescription medication, or if it was administered parenterally. <b>Conclusion:</b> National PHRs may be a secondary source to either confirm a patient's medication history or be used as a starting point for a BPMH.</p>","PeriodicalId":73210,"journal":{"name":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","volume":" ","pages":"18333583241270215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583241270215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: National Personal Health Records (PHRs) have been proposed to improve the transfer of medication-related information during transition of care. Objective: To evaluate the concordance between the medications captured in the Australian national PHR, My Health Record (MyHR), and the pharmacist obtained best possible medication history (BPMH) for patients upon hospital admission. Method: This prospective observational study used a convenience sample of hospital patients. For newly admitted patients, the investigating pharmacist obtained a BPMH and then compared it to the medication list captured in MyHR. Upon comparison, the medications were categorised into either complete match, partial match or mismatch. Medications with a complete or partial match were grouped together. Medications with deviations were then assessed for risk based on their potential consequence, and reported descriptively. A multivariable logistic regression was conducted to assess the factors associated with a drug being mismatched. Results: A total of 82 patients were recruited, with a cumulative total of 1,207 medications documented. Of the 1,207 medications, 714 (59.2%) medications were documented as a complete/partial match. The remaining 493 (40.8%) medications were mismatched. Of the 493 mismatched medications, 442 (89.7%) were deemed low-risk deviations and 51 (10.3%) were deemed high-risk. A medication was more likely to be mismatched, rather than completely/partially matched, if it was a regular non-prescription medication, or "when-required" prescription medication, or "when required" non-prescription medication, or if it was administered parenterally. Conclusion: National PHRs may be a secondary source to either confirm a patient's medication history or be used as a starting point for a BPMH.

在护理过渡期间使用个人健康记录保持用药连续性:观察研究。
背景:国家个人健康记录(PHR)被提议用于改善护理过渡期间药物相关信息的传输。目的评估澳大利亚国家个人健康记录 "我的健康记录"(MyHR)中记录的药物与药剂师为入院患者获取的最佳用药史(BPMH)之间的一致性。研究方法这项前瞻性观察研究采用方便抽样的方式对医院患者进行调查。对于新入院的患者,负责调查的药剂师会获取最佳用药史,然后将其与 MyHR 中记录的药物清单进行比较。比较后,药物被分为完全匹配、部分匹配或不匹配。完全匹配或部分匹配的药品被归为一类。然后根据其潜在后果对存在偏差的药物进行风险评估,并进行描述性报告。进行了多变量逻辑回归,以评估与药物不匹配相关的因素。结果共招募了 82 名患者,累计记录了 1,207 种药物。在这 1207 种药物中,有 714 种(59.2%)药物记录为完全/部分匹配。其余 493 种(40.8%)药物不匹配。在这 493 种不匹配的药物中,442 种(89.7%)被认为是低风险偏差,51 种(10.3%)被认为是高风险偏差。如果药物是常规非处方药,或 "需要时 "处方药,或 "需要时 "非处方药,或经肠道给药,则更有可能不匹配,而不是完全/部分匹配。结论全国个人健康记录可作为确认患者用药史的辅助来源,或作为 BPMH 的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信