Psychological needs fulfillment and perinatal well-being among low-SES individuals: a mixed methods investigation.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Alison F Gammons, Charlotte V Farewell, Chelsea Walker-Mao, Emma Ubriaco, Jenn A Leiferman
{"title":"Psychological needs fulfillment and perinatal well-being among low-SES individuals: a mixed methods investigation.","authors":"Alison F Gammons, Charlotte V Farewell, Chelsea Walker-Mao, Emma Ubriaco, Jenn A Leiferman","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2024.2395838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Poor perinatal mental health is associated with deleterious effects and individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) are at elevated risk. Fortifying multi-level resources of low-SES pregnant individuals to boost their well-being is a crucial step toward achieving equity in perinatal health. The purpose of this project was to explore what patterns of resources supported well-being among low-SES pregnant individuals in Colorado. In a prospective mixed methods cohort study, 23 low-SES pregnant individuals completed surveys and interviews. Participants were separated into 3 subgroups based on their overall Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) score and interviewed to identify multi-level resources that supported their well-being. Our analysis was framed by Self-Determination Theory which contends that three universal basic psychological needs are required for individuals to function in a healthy manner: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. We extrapolated resources that promoted perinatal competence, autonomy, and relatedness from the high well-being group. Perinatal-related knowledge (construct related to competence); mindfulness and intended pregnancy (constructs related to autonomy); and emotional, informational, and friend support, social capital, and connection to nature (constructs related to relatedness) were identified as the resources more frequently endorsed in the high well-being group. Targeting interventions to fortify specific multi-level resources that support the autonomy, competence, and relatedness of pregnant individuals facing socioeconomic disadvantage is a crucial step toward achieving equity in perinatal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11386509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2024.2395838","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poor perinatal mental health is associated with deleterious effects and individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) are at elevated risk. Fortifying multi-level resources of low-SES pregnant individuals to boost their well-being is a crucial step toward achieving equity in perinatal health. The purpose of this project was to explore what patterns of resources supported well-being among low-SES pregnant individuals in Colorado. In a prospective mixed methods cohort study, 23 low-SES pregnant individuals completed surveys and interviews. Participants were separated into 3 subgroups based on their overall Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) score and interviewed to identify multi-level resources that supported their well-being. Our analysis was framed by Self-Determination Theory which contends that three universal basic psychological needs are required for individuals to function in a healthy manner: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. We extrapolated resources that promoted perinatal competence, autonomy, and relatedness from the high well-being group. Perinatal-related knowledge (construct related to competence); mindfulness and intended pregnancy (constructs related to autonomy); and emotional, informational, and friend support, social capital, and connection to nature (constructs related to relatedness) were identified as the resources more frequently endorsed in the high well-being group. Targeting interventions to fortify specific multi-level resources that support the autonomy, competence, and relatedness of pregnant individuals facing socioeconomic disadvantage is a crucial step toward achieving equity in perinatal health.

低社会经济地位人群的心理需求满足与围产期幸福感:一项混合方法调查。
围产期心理健康状况不佳会产生有害影响,而社会经济地位低的人面临的风险更高。加强低社会经济地位孕妇的多层次资源以提高他们的幸福感,是实现围产期健康公平的关键一步。该项目的目的是探索科罗拉多州低社会经济地位孕妇的福利资源模式。在一项前瞻性混合方法队列研究中,23 名低社会经济地位的孕妇完成了调查和访谈。根据参与者的沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS)总分,将其分为三个亚组,并对其进行访谈,以确定支持其幸福感的多层次资源。我们的分析以 "自我决定理论"(Self-Determination Theory)为框架,该理论认为,个人要健康地发挥作用,必须具备三种普遍的基本心理需求:自主性、能力和相关性。我们从高幸福感群体中推断出促进围产期能力、自主性和相关性的资源。围产期相关知识(与能力相关的构念)、正念和预期怀孕(与自主相关的构念)以及情感、信息和朋友支持、社会资本和与自然的联系(与相关性相关的构念)被确定为高幸福感群体中更常认可的资源。有针对性地采取干预措施,加强特定的多层次资源,以支持面临社会经济劣势的孕妇的自主性、能力和相关性,是实现围产期健康公平的关键一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology was founded in 1982 in order to provide a scientific forum for obstetricians, gynecologists, psychiatrists and psychologists, academic health professionals as well as for all those who are interested in the psychosocial and psychosomatic aspects of women’s health. Another of its aims is to stimulate obstetricians and gynecologists to pay more attention to this very important facet of their profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信