Long-term survival of participants in a phase II randomized trial of RNS60 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Elisabetta Pupillo , Elisa Bianchi , Valentina Bonetto , Laura Pasetto , Caterina Bendotti , Sabrina Paganoni , Jessica Mandrioli , Letizia Mazzini , RNS60-ALS Study Group
{"title":"Long-term survival of participants in a phase II randomized trial of RNS60 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis","authors":"Elisabetta Pupillo ,&nbsp;Elisa Bianchi ,&nbsp;Valentina Bonetto ,&nbsp;Laura Pasetto ,&nbsp;Caterina Bendotti ,&nbsp;Sabrina Paganoni ,&nbsp;Jessica Mandrioli ,&nbsp;Letizia Mazzini ,&nbsp;RNS60-ALS Study Group","doi":"10.1016/j.bbi.2024.08.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Positive effects of RNS60 on respiratory and bulbar function were observed in a phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trial in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Objective: to investigate the long-term survival of trial participants and its association with respiratory status and biomarkers of neurodegeneration and inflammation.</p></div><div><h3>Study design and settings</h3><p>A randomized, double blind, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted. Trial participants were enrolled at 22 Italian Expert ALS Centres from May 2017 to January 2020. Vital status of all participants was ascertained thirty-three months after the trial’s last patient last visit (LPLV). Participants were patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, classified as slow or fast progressors based on forced vital capacity (FVC) slope during trial treatment. Demographic, clinical, and biomarker levels and their association with survival were also evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean duration of follow-up was 2.8 years. Long-term median survival was six months longer in the RNS60 group (p = 0.0519). Baseline FVC, and rates of FVC decline during the first 4 weeks of trial participation, were balanced between the active and placebo treatment arms. After 6 months of randomized, placebo-controlled treatment, FVC decline was significantly slower in the RNS60 group compared to the placebo group. Rates of FVC progression during the treatment were strongly associated with long-term survival (median survival: 3.7 years in slow FVC progressors; 1.6 years in fast FVC progressors). The effect of RNS60 in prolonging long-term survival was higher in participants with low neurofilament light chain (NfL) (median survival: &gt;4 years in low NfL − RNS60 group; 3.3 years in low NfL − placebo group; 1.9 years in high NfL − RNS60 group; 1.8 years in high NfL − placebo group) and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1) (median survival: 3.7 years in low MCP-1 − RNS60 group; 2.3 years in low MCP-1 − placebo group; 2.8 years in high MCP-1 − RNS60 group; 2.6 years in high MCP-1 − placebo group) levels at baseline.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and relevance</h3><p>In this post-hoc analysis, long term survival was longer in participants randomized to RNS60 compared with those randomized to placebo and was correlated with slower FVC progression rates, suggesting that longer survival may be mediated by the drug’s effect on respiratory function. In these post-hoc analyses, the beneficial effect of RNS60 on survival was most pronounced in participants with low NfL and MCP-1 levels at study entry, suggesting that this could be a subgroup to target in future studies investigating the effects of RNS60 on survival.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>Study preregistered on 13/Jan/2017 in EUDRA-CT (2016-002382-62). The study was also registered at <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> number NCT03456882.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9199,"journal":{"name":"Brain, Behavior, and Immunity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain, Behavior, and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088915912400566X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Positive effects of RNS60 on respiratory and bulbar function were observed in a phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trial in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Objective: to investigate the long-term survival of trial participants and its association with respiratory status and biomarkers of neurodegeneration and inflammation.

Study design and settings

A randomized, double blind, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted. Trial participants were enrolled at 22 Italian Expert ALS Centres from May 2017 to January 2020. Vital status of all participants was ascertained thirty-three months after the trial’s last patient last visit (LPLV). Participants were patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, classified as slow or fast progressors based on forced vital capacity (FVC) slope during trial treatment. Demographic, clinical, and biomarker levels and their association with survival were also evaluated.

Results

Mean duration of follow-up was 2.8 years. Long-term median survival was six months longer in the RNS60 group (p = 0.0519). Baseline FVC, and rates of FVC decline during the first 4 weeks of trial participation, were balanced between the active and placebo treatment arms. After 6 months of randomized, placebo-controlled treatment, FVC decline was significantly slower in the RNS60 group compared to the placebo group. Rates of FVC progression during the treatment were strongly associated with long-term survival (median survival: 3.7 years in slow FVC progressors; 1.6 years in fast FVC progressors). The effect of RNS60 in prolonging long-term survival was higher in participants with low neurofilament light chain (NfL) (median survival: >4 years in low NfL − RNS60 group; 3.3 years in low NfL − placebo group; 1.9 years in high NfL − RNS60 group; 1.8 years in high NfL − placebo group) and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1) (median survival: 3.7 years in low MCP-1 − RNS60 group; 2.3 years in low MCP-1 − placebo group; 2.8 years in high MCP-1 − RNS60 group; 2.6 years in high MCP-1 − placebo group) levels at baseline.

Conclusions and relevance

In this post-hoc analysis, long term survival was longer in participants randomized to RNS60 compared with those randomized to placebo and was correlated with slower FVC progression rates, suggesting that longer survival may be mediated by the drug’s effect on respiratory function. In these post-hoc analyses, the beneficial effect of RNS60 on survival was most pronounced in participants with low NfL and MCP-1 levels at study entry, suggesting that this could be a subgroup to target in future studies investigating the effects of RNS60 on survival.

Trial registration

Study preregistered on 13/Jan/2017 in EUDRA-CT (2016-002382-62). The study was also registered at ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03456882.

肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症 RNS60 II 期随机试验参与者的长期生存情况。
背景:目的:调查试验参与者的长期存活率及其与呼吸状况、神经变性和炎症生物标志物的关系:进行了一项随机、双盲、2 期临床试验。2017年5月至2020年1月期间,22家意大利ALS专家中心招募了试验参与者。所有参与者的生命体征均在试验最后一次患者访视(LPLV)后33个月确定。参与者均为肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者,根据试验治疗期间的强迫生命容量(FVC)斜率分为进展缓慢型和进展快速型。此外,还对人口统计学、临床和生物标志物水平及其与生存的关系进行了评估:平均随访时间为 2.8 年。RNS60 组的长期中位生存期延长了 6 个月(p = 0.0519)。积极治疗组和安慰剂治疗组的基线 FVC 和试验前 4 周的 FVC 下降率是平衡的。经过 6 个月的随机安慰剂对照治疗后,RNS60 组的 FVC 下降速度明显慢于安慰剂组。治疗期间 FVC 的进展率与长期生存率密切相关(FVC 进展慢者的中位生存期为 3.7 年;FVC 进展快者的中位生存期为 1.6 年)。在低神经丝蛋白轻链(NfL)参与者中,RNS60 延长长期生存期的效果更高(中位生存期:低 NfL - RNS60 组 >4 年;低 NfL - 安慰剂组 3.3 年;高 NfL - RNS60 组 1.9 年;高 NfL - 安慰剂组 1.8年)和单核细胞趋化蛋白-1(MCP-1)(中位生存期:低MCP-1-RNS60组3.7年;低MCP-1-安慰剂组2.3年;高MCP-1-RNS60组2.8年;高MCP-1-安慰剂组2.6年)基线水平:在这项事后分析中,与随机接受安慰剂治疗的患者相比,随机接受 RNS60 治疗的患者的长期生存期更长,并且与 FVC 进展速度更慢相关,这表明更长的生存期可能是由药物对呼吸功能的影响介导的。在这些事后分析中,RNS60对生存期的有利影响在研究开始时NfL和MCP-1水平较低的参与者中最为明显,这表明在未来调查RNS60对生存期影响的研究中,这可能是一个目标亚组:该研究于2017年1月13日在EUDRA-CT(2016-002382-62)进行了预注册。该研究还在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT03456882。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.60
自引率
2.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Established in 1987, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity proudly serves as the official journal of the Psychoneuroimmunology Research Society (PNIRS). This pioneering journal is dedicated to publishing peer-reviewed basic, experimental, and clinical studies that explore the intricate interactions among behavioral, neural, endocrine, and immune systems in both humans and animals. As an international and interdisciplinary platform, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity focuses on original research spanning neuroscience, immunology, integrative physiology, behavioral biology, psychiatry, psychology, and clinical medicine. The journal is inclusive of research conducted at various levels, including molecular, cellular, social, and whole organism perspectives. With a commitment to efficiency, the journal facilitates online submission and review, ensuring timely publication of experimental results. Manuscripts typically undergo peer review and are returned to authors within 30 days of submission. It's worth noting that Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, published eight times a year, does not impose submission fees or page charges, fostering an open and accessible platform for scientific discourse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信