Forum: At the crossroads – Critical perspectives on the study of climate security

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Jonathan Luke Austin , David Chandler , Marwa Daoudy , Rita Floyd , Delf Rothe , Dahlia Simangan
{"title":"Forum: At the crossroads – Critical perspectives on the study of climate security","authors":"Jonathan Luke Austin ,&nbsp;David Chandler ,&nbsp;Marwa Daoudy ,&nbsp;Rita Floyd ,&nbsp;Delf Rothe ,&nbsp;Dahlia Simangan","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This discussion forum brings together some of the leading voices in the debate on climate change and security to reflect on the possibilities and limits of critical research in the face of global ecological crises. If we – as critical geography, IR, and security scholars – take the ongoing ecological crisis seriously, how must our questions, concepts, and methodologies change? How, if at all, can security be provided in a climate-changed world, for and by whom? How to come to terms with the unequal landscape of climate insecurity? What is left of security, and what comes instead: mere survival, resilience, or navigating through disasters?</p><p>Seeking answers to these questions, the authors of these short forum pieces discuss and rethink core concepts and themes of human geography and neighboring disciplines. The reflection pieces trouble the racist imaginaries that often underpin existing policy debates on climate change, scarcity, and insecurity. They discuss the implications of climate security for the liberal international order, North-South relations as well as the relationship between humans and the non-human world. They reflect on the complicity of our research – both critical and problem-solving – in the violent transformation of the planet and the repression of the racialized “others” of colonial modernity. And they explore the emancipatory potential of alternative security discourses that center on the complex web of beings, practices, and relations endangered by the unfolding climate crisis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 104101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524001623/pdfft?md5=3428a14c11fd1ea809350f24bc130342&pid=1-s2.0-S0016718524001623-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524001623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This discussion forum brings together some of the leading voices in the debate on climate change and security to reflect on the possibilities and limits of critical research in the face of global ecological crises. If we – as critical geography, IR, and security scholars – take the ongoing ecological crisis seriously, how must our questions, concepts, and methodologies change? How, if at all, can security be provided in a climate-changed world, for and by whom? How to come to terms with the unequal landscape of climate insecurity? What is left of security, and what comes instead: mere survival, resilience, or navigating through disasters?

Seeking answers to these questions, the authors of these short forum pieces discuss and rethink core concepts and themes of human geography and neighboring disciplines. The reflection pieces trouble the racist imaginaries that often underpin existing policy debates on climate change, scarcity, and insecurity. They discuss the implications of climate security for the liberal international order, North-South relations as well as the relationship between humans and the non-human world. They reflect on the complicity of our research – both critical and problem-solving – in the violent transformation of the planet and the repression of the racialized “others” of colonial modernity. And they explore the emancipatory potential of alternative security discourses that center on the complex web of beings, practices, and relations endangered by the unfolding climate crisis.

论坛:十字路口--气候安全研究的批判性视角
本论坛汇集了气候变化与安全辩论中的一些领军人物,共同思考面对全球生态危机开展批判性研究的可能性和局限性。如果我们--作为批判性地理学、国际关系和安全学者--认真对待正在发生的生态危机,我们的问题、概念和方法必须如何改变?在一个气候发生变化的世界中,如何提供安全?如何面对气候不安全的不平等状况?为了寻求这些问题的答案,这些论坛短文的作者们讨论并重新思考了人文地理学及相关学科的核心概念和主题。这些反思文章对种族主义想象提出了质疑,而种族主义想象往往是现有气候变化、匮乏和不安全政策辩论的基础。它们讨论了气候安全对自由国际秩序、南北关系以及人类与非人类世界之间关系的影响。他们反思了我们的研究--无论是批判性研究还是解决问题的研究--在地球的暴力变革和殖民现代性对种族化 "他者 "的压制中的共谋性。他们还探讨了替代性安全论述的解放潜力,这些论述的核心是受到正在发生的气候危机威胁的复杂的生命网络、实践和关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信