Compatible multi-model output fusion for complex systems modeling via set operation-based focus data identification

IF 3.1 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Chenhao Yu , Leilei Chang , Xiaobin Xu , You Cao , Zhenjie Zhang
{"title":"Compatible multi-model output fusion for complex systems modeling via set operation-based focus data identification","authors":"Chenhao Yu ,&nbsp;Leilei Chang ,&nbsp;Xiaobin Xu ,&nbsp;You Cao ,&nbsp;Zhenjie Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jocs.2024.102423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Is an inferior model completely useless in complex systems modeling? This study proposes a novel multi-model output fusion approach that makes the best of the outputs from multi-models, i.e., using the limited superior results from inferior models to compensate for certain inferior results from even superior models. For fusing the outputs from multi-models, the weight assigned to each output is calculated based on two factors, namely the accuracy of each model and the similarity between the testing input and the focus data used for constructing the respective model. Specifically for similarity calculation, the focus data list is identified based on set operations. There are three theoretical contributions of this study, namely accuracy-and-similarity-based weight calculation, the set-operation-based similarity calculation which is an addition to traditional distance-based calculation, and the high compatibility of the proposed approach which is independent from any baseline approach. A practical case of overall reconnaissance capability evaluation of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) swarm is studied for validation. Primary results indicate that the proposed approach can outperform two single models: the backpropagation neural network (BPNN) and the Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network. Further validations demonstrate that the proposed approach also outperforms multi-model output fusion with equal weights, without model accuracy, with varied focus data percentages ranging from 0.1 to 0.9. More importantly, the proposed approach remains effective in four different conditions of multi-model outputs fusion with improvements from 9.58 % to 38.03 %.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48907,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Science","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102423"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877750324002163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Is an inferior model completely useless in complex systems modeling? This study proposes a novel multi-model output fusion approach that makes the best of the outputs from multi-models, i.e., using the limited superior results from inferior models to compensate for certain inferior results from even superior models. For fusing the outputs from multi-models, the weight assigned to each output is calculated based on two factors, namely the accuracy of each model and the similarity between the testing input and the focus data used for constructing the respective model. Specifically for similarity calculation, the focus data list is identified based on set operations. There are three theoretical contributions of this study, namely accuracy-and-similarity-based weight calculation, the set-operation-based similarity calculation which is an addition to traditional distance-based calculation, and the high compatibility of the proposed approach which is independent from any baseline approach. A practical case of overall reconnaissance capability evaluation of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) swarm is studied for validation. Primary results indicate that the proposed approach can outperform two single models: the backpropagation neural network (BPNN) and the Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network. Further validations demonstrate that the proposed approach also outperforms multi-model output fusion with equal weights, without model accuracy, with varied focus data percentages ranging from 0.1 to 0.9. More importantly, the proposed approach remains effective in four different conditions of multi-model outputs fusion with improvements from 9.58 % to 38.03 %.

通过基于集合操作的焦点数据识别,为复杂系统建模实现兼容的多模型输出融合
在复杂系统建模中,劣质模型是否完全无用?本研究提出了一种新颖的多模型输出融合方法,即利用劣质模型的有限优势结果来弥补优等模型的某些劣势结果,从而使多模型输出达到最佳效果。在融合多模型输出时,分配给每个输出的权重是根据两个因素计算的,即每个模型的准确性和测试输入与用于构建相应模型的焦点数据之间的相似性。具体到相似性计算,重点数据列表是根据集合运算确定的。本研究有三个理论贡献,即基于准确度和相似度的权重计算、基于集合操作的相似度计算(这是对传统的基于距离计算的补充),以及所提方法的高兼容性(它独立于任何基线方法)。研究了一个无人机群整体侦察能力评估的实际案例,以进行验证。初步结果表明,所提出的方法优于两种单一模型:反向传播神经网络(BPNN)和径向基函数(RBF)神经网络。进一步的验证表明,在不考虑模型准确性的情况下,所提出的方法还优于权重相等的多模型输出融合方法,重点数据百分比从 0.1 到 0.9 不等。更重要的是,所提出的方法在四种不同的多模型输出融合条件下依然有效,改进幅度从 9.58 % 到 38.03 % 不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computational Science
Journal of Computational Science COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
227
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Computational Science is a rapidly growing multi- and interdisciplinary field that uses advanced computing and data analysis to understand and solve complex problems. It has reached a level of predictive capability that now firmly complements the traditional pillars of experimentation and theory. The recent advances in experimental techniques such as detectors, on-line sensor networks and high-resolution imaging techniques, have opened up new windows into physical and biological processes at many levels of detail. The resulting data explosion allows for detailed data driven modeling and simulation. This new discipline in science combines computational thinking, modern computational methods, devices and collateral technologies to address problems far beyond the scope of traditional numerical methods. Computational science typically unifies three distinct elements: • Modeling, Algorithms and Simulations (e.g. numerical and non-numerical, discrete and continuous); • Software developed to solve science (e.g., biological, physical, and social), engineering, medicine, and humanities problems; • Computer and information science that develops and optimizes the advanced system hardware, software, networking, and data management components (e.g. problem solving environments).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信