Radiographers’ perspectives on immobilisation and restraint mechanisms in paediatric radiography

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Radiographers’ perspectives on immobilisation and restraint mechanisms in paediatric radiography","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The utilisation of immobilisation or restraint during paediatric radiography is a multifactorial issue with associated legal and ethical considerations. Current practice regularly presents challenges for radiographers, with a notable absence of any professional best-practice guidance. This study investigated radiographers’ perspectives in Ireland on the use of immobilisation or restraint methods and the factors influencing these choices and aimed to fill the 20-year gap in European radiographers’ perspectives gaining an up-to-date understanding and contribute to the global conversation in this regard.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An anonymous online survey design was constructed using the Google Forms platform and distributed to hospital radiology departments across the Southern region of Ireland. Additionally, a short survey was send to the head of the nine radiology departments to audit the existing availability of immobilisation and/or restraint devices for paediatric radiography. Descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) were undertaken. Bar charts were utilised where appropriate to display trends.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundered and three responses were received. The majority of radiographers reported using immobilisation (95 %) or restraint (89 %) techniques during paediatric radiography, although 70 % acknowledged the lack of training regarding restraint techniques. However, 93 % reported trying alternative techniques such as distraction and negotiation to avoid immobilisation or restraint. A desire for further guidance and training was reported, with 80 % of respondents noting training as essential or potentially beneficial.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Ambiguity remains surrounding the distinction between the terms “restraint” and “immobilisation” in paediatric radiography. Radiographers' use of restraint and immobilisation during paediatric radiography is influenced by the child's age, distress level, radiation protection and safety, and the ability of the child to understand instructions. Appropriate up-to-date guidelines and training would be recommended to clarify terminology and promote the safe practice of restraint and immobilisation during paediatric radiography.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424004697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The utilisation of immobilisation or restraint during paediatric radiography is a multifactorial issue with associated legal and ethical considerations. Current practice regularly presents challenges for radiographers, with a notable absence of any professional best-practice guidance. This study investigated radiographers’ perspectives in Ireland on the use of immobilisation or restraint methods and the factors influencing these choices and aimed to fill the 20-year gap in European radiographers’ perspectives gaining an up-to-date understanding and contribute to the global conversation in this regard.

Methods

An anonymous online survey design was constructed using the Google Forms platform and distributed to hospital radiology departments across the Southern region of Ireland. Additionally, a short survey was send to the head of the nine radiology departments to audit the existing availability of immobilisation and/or restraint devices for paediatric radiography. Descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) were undertaken. Bar charts were utilised where appropriate to display trends.

Results

One hundered and three responses were received. The majority of radiographers reported using immobilisation (95 %) or restraint (89 %) techniques during paediatric radiography, although 70 % acknowledged the lack of training regarding restraint techniques. However, 93 % reported trying alternative techniques such as distraction and negotiation to avoid immobilisation or restraint. A desire for further guidance and training was reported, with 80 % of respondents noting training as essential or potentially beneficial.

Conclusions

Ambiguity remains surrounding the distinction between the terms “restraint” and “immobilisation” in paediatric radiography. Radiographers' use of restraint and immobilisation during paediatric radiography is influenced by the child's age, distress level, radiation protection and safety, and the ability of the child to understand instructions. Appropriate up-to-date guidelines and training would be recommended to clarify terminology and promote the safe practice of restraint and immobilisation during paediatric radiography.

放射技师对儿科放射摄影中固定和约束机制的看法
引言 在儿科放射摄影过程中使用固定或约束手段是一个多因素的问题,涉及相关的法律和伦理因素。目前的做法经常给放射技师带来挑战,但明显缺乏任何专业的最佳实践指导。本研究调查了爱尔兰放射技师对使用固定或约束方法的看法,以及影响这些选择的因素,旨在填补欧洲放射技师在获得最新认识方面存在的 20 年空白,并为这方面的全球对话做出贡献。方法使用谷歌表格平台设计了匿名在线调查,并分发给爱尔兰南部地区的医院放射科。此外,还向九个放射科部门的负责人发送了一份简短的调查问卷,以审核儿科放射摄影中固定和/或约束装置的现有可用性。我们进行了描述性统计(频率和百分比)。在适当情况下使用条形图显示趋势。大多数放射技师表示在儿科放射摄影过程中使用了固定(95%)或约束(89%)技术,尽管 70% 的放射技师承认缺乏有关约束技术的培训。不过,93% 的放射技师表示尝试过分散注意力和协商等替代技术,以避免固定或束缚。80%的受访者认为培训是必要的或可能有益的。结论:在儿科放射摄影中,"约束 "和 "固定 "这两个术语之间的区别仍然模糊不清。放射技师在儿科放射摄影中使用束缚和固定的方法受到儿童的年龄、痛苦程度、辐射防护和安全以及儿童理解指示的能力的影响。建议提供适当的最新指南和培训,以明确术语并促进儿科放射摄影过程中约束和固定的安全实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
231
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信