Ivanka Sojat Tarp, Vicki Trier Taasti, Maria Fuglsang Jensen, Anne Vestergaard, Kenneth Jensen
{"title":"Benefit of range uncertainty reduction in robust optimisation for proton therapy of brain, head-and-neck and breast cancer patients","authors":"Ivanka Sojat Tarp, Vicki Trier Taasti, Maria Fuglsang Jensen, Anne Vestergaard, Kenneth Jensen","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><p>The primary cause of range uncertainty in proton therapy is inaccuracy in estimating the stopping-power ratio from computed tomography. This study examined the impact on dose-volume metrics by reducing range uncertainty in robust optimisation for a diverse patient cohort and determined the level of range uncertainty that resulted in a relevant reduction in doses to organs-at-risk (OARs).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>The effect of reducing range uncertainty on OAR doses was evaluated by robustly optimising six proton plans with varying range uncertainty levels (ranging from 3.5% in the original plan to 1.0%), keeping setup uncertainty fixed. All plans used the initial clinical treatment plan’s beam directions and optimisation objectives and were optimised until a clinically acceptable plan was achieved across all setup and range scenarios. The effect of reduced range uncertainty on dose-volume metrics for OARs near the target was evaluated. This study included 30 brain cancer patients, as well as five head-and-neck and five breast cancer patients, investigating the relevance of reducing range uncertainty when different setup uncertainties were used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Lowering range uncertainty slightly reduced the nominal dose to surrounding tissue. For body volume receiving 80% of the prescribed dose, reducing range uncertainty from 3.5% to 2.0% resulted in a median decrease of 4 cm<sup>3</sup> for the brain, 17 cm<sup>3</sup> for head-and-neck, and 27 cm<sup>3</sup> for breast cancer patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Reducing range uncertainty in robust optimisation showed a reduction in dose to OARs. The clinical relevance depends on the affected organs and the clinical dose constraints.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001027/pdfft?md5=40ea3b02cd9b1b02dc1f30a7b0acf9f4&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624001027-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Purpose
The primary cause of range uncertainty in proton therapy is inaccuracy in estimating the stopping-power ratio from computed tomography. This study examined the impact on dose-volume metrics by reducing range uncertainty in robust optimisation for a diverse patient cohort and determined the level of range uncertainty that resulted in a relevant reduction in doses to organs-at-risk (OARs).
Materials and Methods
The effect of reducing range uncertainty on OAR doses was evaluated by robustly optimising six proton plans with varying range uncertainty levels (ranging from 3.5% in the original plan to 1.0%), keeping setup uncertainty fixed. All plans used the initial clinical treatment plan’s beam directions and optimisation objectives and were optimised until a clinically acceptable plan was achieved across all setup and range scenarios. The effect of reduced range uncertainty on dose-volume metrics for OARs near the target was evaluated. This study included 30 brain cancer patients, as well as five head-and-neck and five breast cancer patients, investigating the relevance of reducing range uncertainty when different setup uncertainties were used.
Results
Lowering range uncertainty slightly reduced the nominal dose to surrounding tissue. For body volume receiving 80% of the prescribed dose, reducing range uncertainty from 3.5% to 2.0% resulted in a median decrease of 4 cm3 for the brain, 17 cm3 for head-and-neck, and 27 cm3 for breast cancer patients.
Conclusions
Reducing range uncertainty in robust optimisation showed a reduction in dose to OARs. The clinical relevance depends on the affected organs and the clinical dose constraints.