Intraoperative methadone administration for total mastectomy: A single center retrospective study

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Juan P. Cata M.D , Yusuf Zaidi , Juan Jose Guerra-Londono M.D , Evan D. Kharasch M.D, Ph.D , Matthew Piotrowski M.D , Spencer Kee M.D , Nicolas A. Cortes-Mejia M.D , Jose Miguel Gloria-Escobar M.D , Peter F. Thall Ph.D , Ruitao Lin Ph.D
{"title":"Intraoperative methadone administration for total mastectomy: A single center retrospective study","authors":"Juan P. Cata M.D ,&nbsp;Yusuf Zaidi ,&nbsp;Juan Jose Guerra-Londono M.D ,&nbsp;Evan D. Kharasch M.D, Ph.D ,&nbsp;Matthew Piotrowski M.D ,&nbsp;Spencer Kee M.D ,&nbsp;Nicolas A. Cortes-Mejia M.D ,&nbsp;Jose Miguel Gloria-Escobar M.D ,&nbsp;Peter F. Thall Ph.D ,&nbsp;Ruitao Lin Ph.D","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Breast cancer is the most frequent type of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Mastectomies remain a key component of the treatment of non-metastatic breast cancer, and strategies to treat acute postoperative pain, a complication affecting nearly all patients undergoing surgery, continues to be an important clinical challenge. This study aimed to determine the impact of intraoperative methadone administration compared to conventional short-acting opioids on pain-related perioperative outcomes in women undergoing a mastectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center retrospective study included adult women undergoing total mastectomy. The primary outcome of this study was postoperative pain intensity on day 1 after surgery. Secondary outcomes included perioperative opioid consumption, perioperative non-opioid analgesics use, duration of surgery and anesthesia, time to extubation, pain intensity in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), anti-emetic use in PACU, and length of stay in hospital. We used the propensity score-based nearest matching with a 1:3 ratio to balance the patient baseline characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>133 patients received methadone, and 2192 patients were treated with short-acting opioids. The analysis demonstrated that methadone was associated with significantly lower intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption as measured by oral morphine equivalents and lower average pain intensity scores in the postanesthesia care unit. Moreover, methadone was also shown to reduce the use of non-opioid analgesia during surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study suggests that the unique pharmacological properties of methadone, including a short onset of action when given intravenously, long-acting pharmacokinetics, and multimodal effects, are associated with better acute pain management after a total mastectomy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 111572"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer is the most frequent type of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Mastectomies remain a key component of the treatment of non-metastatic breast cancer, and strategies to treat acute postoperative pain, a complication affecting nearly all patients undergoing surgery, continues to be an important clinical challenge. This study aimed to determine the impact of intraoperative methadone administration compared to conventional short-acting opioids on pain-related perioperative outcomes in women undergoing a mastectomy.

Methods

This single-center retrospective study included adult women undergoing total mastectomy. The primary outcome of this study was postoperative pain intensity on day 1 after surgery. Secondary outcomes included perioperative opioid consumption, perioperative non-opioid analgesics use, duration of surgery and anesthesia, time to extubation, pain intensity in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), anti-emetic use in PACU, and length of stay in hospital. We used the propensity score-based nearest matching with a 1:3 ratio to balance the patient baseline characteristics.

Results

133 patients received methadone, and 2192 patients were treated with short-acting opioids. The analysis demonstrated that methadone was associated with significantly lower intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption as measured by oral morphine equivalents and lower average pain intensity scores in the postanesthesia care unit. Moreover, methadone was also shown to reduce the use of non-opioid analgesia during surgery.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that the unique pharmacological properties of methadone, including a short onset of action when given intravenously, long-acting pharmacokinetics, and multimodal effects, are associated with better acute pain management after a total mastectomy.

全乳房切除术术中美沙酮给药:单中心回顾性研究
背景乳腺癌是最常见的癌症类型,也是女性癌症相关死亡的第二大原因。乳房切除术仍是治疗非转移性乳腺癌的关键组成部分,而术后急性疼痛是几乎所有接受手术的患者都会出现的并发症,其治疗策略仍是一项重要的临床挑战。本研究旨在确定与传统的短效阿片类药物相比,术中使用美沙酮对接受乳房切除术的妇女疼痛相关围手术期结果的影响。本研究的主要结果是术后第 1 天的术后疼痛强度。次要结果包括围手术期阿片类药物用量、围手术期非阿片类镇痛药用量、手术和麻醉持续时间、拔管时间、麻醉后护理病房(PACU)的疼痛强度、PACU的止吐药用量和住院时间。我们采用基于倾向评分的最近匹配法,以 1:3 的比例平衡患者的基线特征。结果 133 名患者接受了美沙酮治疗,2192 名患者接受了短效阿片类药物治疗。分析表明,以口服吗啡当量衡量,美沙酮可显著降低术中和术后阿片类药物的消耗量,并降低麻醉后护理病房的平均疼痛强度评分。结论我们的研究表明,美沙酮独特的药理特性,包括静脉注射起效时间短、长效药代动力学和多模式效应,与全乳房切除术后更好的急性疼痛管理有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信