Veterans' use of inpatient and outpatient palliative care: The national landscape.

Brystana G Kaufman, Sandra Woolson, Catherine Stanwyck, Madison Burns, Paul Dennis, Jessica Ma, Shelli Feder, Joshua M Thorpe, S Nicole Hastings, David B Bekelman, Courtney H Van Houtven
{"title":"Veterans' use of inpatient and outpatient palliative care: The national landscape.","authors":"Brystana G Kaufman, Sandra Woolson, Catherine Stanwyck, Madison Burns, Paul Dennis, Jessica Ma, Shelli Feder, Joshua M Thorpe, S Nicole Hastings, David B Bekelman, Courtney H Van Houtven","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care improves the quality of life for people with life-limiting conditions, which are common among older adults. Despite the Veterans Health Administration (VA) outpatient palliative care expansion, most research has focused on inpatient palliative care. This study aimed to compare veteran characteristics and hospice use for palliative care users across care settings (inpatient vs. outpatient) and dose (number of palliative care encounters).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This national cohort included veterans with any VA palliative care encounters from 2014 through 2017. We used VA and Medicare administrative data (2010-2017) to describe veteran demographics, socioeconomic status, life-limiting conditions, frailty, and palliative care utilization. Specialty palliative care encounters were identified using clinic stop codes (353, 351) and current procedural terminology codes (99241-99245).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 120,249 unique veterans with specialty palliative care over 4 years, 67.8% had palliative care only in the inpatient setting (n = 81,523) and 32.2% had at least one palliative care encounter in the outpatient setting (n = 38,726), with or without an inpatient palliative care encounter. Outpatient versus inpatient palliative care users were more likely to have cancer and less likely to have high frailty, but sociodemographic factors including rurality and housing instability were similar. Duration of hospice use was similar between inpatient (median = 37 days; IQR = 11, 112) and outpatient (median = 44 days; IQR = 14, 118) palliative care users, and shorter among those with only one palliative care encounter (median = 18 days; IQR = 5, 64).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This national evaluation provides novel insights into the care setting and dose of VA specialty palliative care for veterans. Among veterans with palliative care use, one-third received at least some palliative care in the outpatient care setting. Differences between veterans with inpatient and outpatient use motivate the need for further research to understand how care settings and number of palliative care encounters impact outcomes for veterans and older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Palliative care improves the quality of life for people with life-limiting conditions, which are common among older adults. Despite the Veterans Health Administration (VA) outpatient palliative care expansion, most research has focused on inpatient palliative care. This study aimed to compare veteran characteristics and hospice use for palliative care users across care settings (inpatient vs. outpatient) and dose (number of palliative care encounters).

Methods: This national cohort included veterans with any VA palliative care encounters from 2014 through 2017. We used VA and Medicare administrative data (2010-2017) to describe veteran demographics, socioeconomic status, life-limiting conditions, frailty, and palliative care utilization. Specialty palliative care encounters were identified using clinic stop codes (353, 351) and current procedural terminology codes (99241-99245).

Results: Of 120,249 unique veterans with specialty palliative care over 4 years, 67.8% had palliative care only in the inpatient setting (n = 81,523) and 32.2% had at least one palliative care encounter in the outpatient setting (n = 38,726), with or without an inpatient palliative care encounter. Outpatient versus inpatient palliative care users were more likely to have cancer and less likely to have high frailty, but sociodemographic factors including rurality and housing instability were similar. Duration of hospice use was similar between inpatient (median = 37 days; IQR = 11, 112) and outpatient (median = 44 days; IQR = 14, 118) palliative care users, and shorter among those with only one palliative care encounter (median = 18 days; IQR = 5, 64).

Conclusions: This national evaluation provides novel insights into the care setting and dose of VA specialty palliative care for veterans. Among veterans with palliative care use, one-third received at least some palliative care in the outpatient care setting. Differences between veterans with inpatient and outpatient use motivate the need for further research to understand how care settings and number of palliative care encounters impact outcomes for veterans and older adults.

退伍军人使用住院和门诊姑息关怀的情况:全国情况。
背景:姑息关怀改善了患有局限性疾病的人的生活质量,这种疾病在老年人中很常见。尽管退伍军人健康管理局(VA)扩大了门诊姑息关怀的范围,但大多数研究都集中在住院姑息关怀方面。本研究旨在比较退伍军人的特征以及姑息关怀使用者在不同关怀环境(住院病人与门诊病人)和剂量(姑息关怀就诊次数)下的临终关怀使用情况:该全国队列包括2014年至2017年期间接受过退伍军人事务部姑息治疗的退伍军人。我们使用退伍军人事务部和医疗保险管理数据(2010-2017 年)来描述退伍军人的人口统计学特征、社会经济状况、临终状况、虚弱程度和姑息关怀的使用情况。使用诊所停止代码(353、351)和当前程序术语代码(99241-99245)确定了专业姑息治疗就诊情况:在 4 年内接受过专业姑息治疗的 120,249 名退伍军人中,67.8% 的人只在住院环境中接受过姑息治疗(n = 81,523),32.2% 的人在门诊环境中至少接受过一次姑息治疗(n = 38,726),无论是否在住院环境中接受过姑息治疗。门诊姑息关怀使用者与住院姑息关怀使用者相比,患癌症的可能性更大,身体虚弱的可能性更小,但包括农村和住房不稳定在内的社会人口因素却相似。住院病人(中位数=37天;IQR=11-112)和门诊病人(中位数=44天;IQR=14-118)的姑息关怀使用者使用临终关怀服务的时间相似,而只有一次姑息关怀经历的病人使用临终关怀服务的时间较短(中位数=18天;IQR=5-64):这项全国性评估为退伍军人专科姑息关怀的护理环境和剂量提供了新的见解。在使用姑息治疗的退伍军人中,三分之一的人至少在门诊接受了一些姑息治疗。住院和门诊退伍军人之间的差异促使人们需要进一步研究,以了解护理环境和姑息关怀的次数如何影响退伍军人和老年人的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信