Arm symptom pattern among breast cancer survivors with and without lymphedema: a contemporaneous network analysis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyae217
Aomei Shen, Zhongning Zhang, Jingming Ye, Yue Wang, Hongmeng Zhao, Xin Li, Peipei Wu, Wanmin Qiang, Qian Lu
{"title":"Arm symptom pattern among breast cancer survivors with and without lymphedema: a contemporaneous network analysis.","authors":"Aomei Shen, Zhongning Zhang, Jingming Ye, Yue Wang, Hongmeng Zhao, Xin Li, Peipei Wu, Wanmin Qiang, Qian Lu","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arm symptoms commonly endure in post-breast cancer period and persist into long-term survivorship. However, a knowledge gap existed regarding the interactions among these symptoms. This study aimed to construct symptom networks and visualize the interrelationships among arm symptoms in breast cancer survivors (BCS) both with and without lymphedema (LE).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of 3 cross-sectional studies. All participants underwent arm circumference measurements and symptom assessment. We analyzed 17 symptoms with a prevalence >15%, identifying clusters and covariates through exploratory factor and linear regression analysis. Contemporaneous networks were constructed with centrality indices calculated. Network comparison tests were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1116 cases without missing data were analyzed, revealing a 29.84% prevalence of LE. Axillary lymph node dissection [ALND] (vs sentinel lymph node biopsy [SLNB]), longer post-surgery duration, and radiotherapy significantly impacted overall symptom severity (P < .001). \"Lymphatic Stasis,\" \"Nerve Injury,\" and \"Movement Limitation\" symptom clusters were identified. Core symptoms varied: tightness for total sample network, firmness for non-LE network, and tightness for LE network. LE survivors reported more prevalent and severe arm symptoms with stronger network connections than non-LE group (P = .010). No significant differences were observed among different subgroups of covariates (P > .05). Network structures were significantly different between ALND and SLNB groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study revealed arm symptoms pattern and interrelationships in BCS. Targeting core symptoms in assessment and intervention might be efficient for arm symptoms management. Future research is warranted to construct dynamic symptom networks in longitudinal data and investigate causal relationships among symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":"e1656-e1668"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arm symptoms commonly endure in post-breast cancer period and persist into long-term survivorship. However, a knowledge gap existed regarding the interactions among these symptoms. This study aimed to construct symptom networks and visualize the interrelationships among arm symptoms in breast cancer survivors (BCS) both with and without lymphedema (LE).

Patients and methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of 3 cross-sectional studies. All participants underwent arm circumference measurements and symptom assessment. We analyzed 17 symptoms with a prevalence >15%, identifying clusters and covariates through exploratory factor and linear regression analysis. Contemporaneous networks were constructed with centrality indices calculated. Network comparison tests were performed.

Results: 1116 cases without missing data were analyzed, revealing a 29.84% prevalence of LE. Axillary lymph node dissection [ALND] (vs sentinel lymph node biopsy [SLNB]), longer post-surgery duration, and radiotherapy significantly impacted overall symptom severity (P < .001). "Lymphatic Stasis," "Nerve Injury," and "Movement Limitation" symptom clusters were identified. Core symptoms varied: tightness for total sample network, firmness for non-LE network, and tightness for LE network. LE survivors reported more prevalent and severe arm symptoms with stronger network connections than non-LE group (P = .010). No significant differences were observed among different subgroups of covariates (P > .05). Network structures were significantly different between ALND and SLNB groups.

Conclusion: Our study revealed arm symptoms pattern and interrelationships in BCS. Targeting core symptoms in assessment and intervention might be efficient for arm symptoms management. Future research is warranted to construct dynamic symptom networks in longitudinal data and investigate causal relationships among symptoms.

患有和未患有淋巴水肿的乳腺癌幸存者的手臂症状模式:同期网络分析。
背景:在乳腺癌术后,手臂症状通常会持续存在,并且会长期存在。然而,关于这些症状之间的相互作用还存在知识空白。本研究旨在构建乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)的症状网络,并直观显示淋巴水肿(LE)患者和非淋巴水肿患者手臂症状之间的相互关系:我们对 3 项横断面研究进行了二次分析。所有参与者都接受了臂围测量和症状评估。我们分析了发病率大于 15% 的 17 种症状,通过探索性因子和线性回归分析确定了症状群和协变量。我们构建了同期网络,并计算了中心度指数。进行了网络比较测试:结果:分析了 1116 个无数据缺失的病例,发现 LE 的发病率为 29.84%。腋窝淋巴结清扫[ALND](与前哨淋巴结活检[SLNB]相比)、手术后持续时间延长和放疗对总体症状严重程度有显著影响(P .05)。ALND组和SLNB组的网络结构明显不同:我们的研究揭示了 BCS 中手臂症状的模式和相互关系。针对核心症状进行评估和干预可能会有效控制手臂症状。未来的研究需要在纵向数据中构建动态症状网络,并调查症状之间的因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信