The Management of Depression and Anxiety in Primary Care: Examining Predictors of Adherence to a Psychopharmacological Collaborative Care Management Program for Veterans.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Zachary D Zuschlag, Benjamin Lord, Teagen Smith, Alexander Lengerich, Brianna Tindall, Kaitlin Leonard, Yvette Guereca, Vanessa Panaite, Ambuj Kumar, Michael A Norred, Vanessa A Milsom
{"title":"The Management of Depression and Anxiety in Primary Care: Examining Predictors of Adherence to a Psychopharmacological Collaborative Care Management Program for Veterans.","authors":"Zachary D Zuschlag, Benjamin Lord, Teagen Smith, Alexander Lengerich, Brianna Tindall, Kaitlin Leonard, Yvette Guereca, Vanessa Panaite, Ambuj Kumar, Michael A Norred, Vanessa A Milsom","doi":"10.1007/s11414-024-09904-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Collaborative care management (CoCM) is an evidenced based approach to psychiatric treatment in primary care, yet literature examining factors associated with program adherence is lacking. This study analyzed predictors of adherence to a CoCM model of psychopharmacological treatment of depression and anxiety in primary care by conducting a retrospective cohort analysis on Veterans referred to a large VA Medical Center's CoCM program over an 18-month period. Baseline characteristics, symptomatic assessments, and covariates of interest were collected. For the primary outcome, the association between covariates and programmatic completion were analyzed. Secondary analyses assessed improvements in psychiatric symptoms. A total of 757 Veterans with depressive or anxiety disorders were included, and 256 completed the CoCM program. Baseline covariates associated with differences in completion rates included the following: age, contact with psychology prior to referral, baseline PHQ-9, baseline GAD-7, and a number of comorbid psychiatric/substance abuse covariates. After controlling for baseline differences, age remained a significant positive predictor of completion (OR 1.019, 95% CI 1.008‒1.030) and cannabis use a significant negative predictor (OR 0.507, 95% CI 0.275‒0.934). Both early improvement in PHQ-9 (OR 1.864, 95% CI 1.210‒2.872) and GAD-7 (OR 1.762, 95% CI 1.154‒2.691) scores were positive predictors. Secondary analyses showed that programmatic completion was associated with greater reductions in psychiatric symptoms. Results identified a number of modifiable parameters associated with differences in completion rates and greater symptomatic reduction for those who complete the program. Additional studies should be conducted examining interventions to optimize CoCM programs by supporting positive predictors while minimizing negative predictors.</p>","PeriodicalId":49040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-024-09904-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaborative care management (CoCM) is an evidenced based approach to psychiatric treatment in primary care, yet literature examining factors associated with program adherence is lacking. This study analyzed predictors of adherence to a CoCM model of psychopharmacological treatment of depression and anxiety in primary care by conducting a retrospective cohort analysis on Veterans referred to a large VA Medical Center's CoCM program over an 18-month period. Baseline characteristics, symptomatic assessments, and covariates of interest were collected. For the primary outcome, the association between covariates and programmatic completion were analyzed. Secondary analyses assessed improvements in psychiatric symptoms. A total of 757 Veterans with depressive or anxiety disorders were included, and 256 completed the CoCM program. Baseline covariates associated with differences in completion rates included the following: age, contact with psychology prior to referral, baseline PHQ-9, baseline GAD-7, and a number of comorbid psychiatric/substance abuse covariates. After controlling for baseline differences, age remained a significant positive predictor of completion (OR 1.019, 95% CI 1.008‒1.030) and cannabis use a significant negative predictor (OR 0.507, 95% CI 0.275‒0.934). Both early improvement in PHQ-9 (OR 1.864, 95% CI 1.210‒2.872) and GAD-7 (OR 1.762, 95% CI 1.154‒2.691) scores were positive predictors. Secondary analyses showed that programmatic completion was associated with greater reductions in psychiatric symptoms. Results identified a number of modifiable parameters associated with differences in completion rates and greater symptomatic reduction for those who complete the program. Additional studies should be conducted examining interventions to optimize CoCM programs by supporting positive predictors while minimizing negative predictors.

初级保健中的抑郁和焦虑管理:研究退伍军人坚持精神药物合作护理管理计划的预测因素。
协作护理管理(CoCM)是一种在初级医疗中进行精神治疗的循证方法,但目前还缺乏研究与坚持该计划相关因素的文献。本研究通过对转诊至退伍军人协会医疗中心的大型 CoCM 项目的退伍军人进行为期 18 个月的回顾性队列分析,分析了在初级医疗中对抑郁和焦虑进行精神药物治疗的 CoCM 模式的依从性预测因素。我们收集了基线特征、症状评估和相关协变量。对于主要结果,分析了协变量与计划完成之间的关联。次要分析评估了精神症状的改善情况。共有 757 名退伍军人患有抑郁症或焦虑症,其中 256 人完成了 CoCM 计划。与完成率差异相关的基线协变量包括:年龄、转介前与心理学的接触、PHQ-9 基线、GAD-7 基线以及一些合并精神病/药物滥用协变量。在控制了基线差异后,年龄仍然是完成治疗的一个重要正向预测因素(OR 1.019,95% CI 1.008-1.030),而吸食大麻则是一个重要的负向预测因素(OR 0.507,95% CI 0.275-0.934)。PHQ-9(OR 1.864,95% CI 1.210-2.872)和 GAD-7 (OR 1.762,95% CI 1.154-2.691)评分的早期改善都是积极的预测因素。二次分析表明,计划的完成与精神症状的进一步减轻有关。研究结果发现,一些可调整的参数与完成率的差异以及完成项目者症状减轻的程度有关。应开展更多研究,通过支持积极的预测因素,同时尽量减少消极的预测因素,研究优化 CoCM 计划的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal examines the organization, financing, delivery and outcomes of behavioral health services (i.e., alcohol, drug abuse, and mental disorders), providing practical and empirical contributions to and explaining the implications for the broader behavioral health field. Each issue includes an overview of contemporary concerns and recent developments in behavioral health policy and management through research articles, policy perspectives, commentaries, brief reports, and book reviews. This journal is the official publication of the National Council for Behavioral Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信