Exploring the Associations of Personality and Sexual Health Using the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders.

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1080/0092623X.2024.2391340
Mélissa Deschênes, Dominick Gamache, Marie-Pier Vaillancourt-Morel, Kristel Mayrand, Marie-Chloé Nolin, Nicolas Berthelot, Coralie Mercerat, Claudia Savard
{"title":"Exploring the Associations of Personality and Sexual Health Using the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders.","authors":"Mélissa Deschênes, Dominick Gamache, Marie-Pier Vaillancourt-Morel, Kristel Mayrand, Marie-Chloé Nolin, Nicolas Berthelot, Coralie Mercerat, Claudia Savard","doi":"10.1080/0092623X.2024.2391340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored the relationships between sexual health indicators (i.e., sexual satisfaction, distress, and function) and the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, a promising dimensional framework for assessing personality pathology. A sample of 489 participants seeking help in private practice clinics completed self-report measures of sexual satisfaction, distress, and function, as well as dyadic adjustment, psychological distress, romantic attachment, personality impairment, and pathological personality facets. Results first showed that participants reaching the cutoffs for a personality disorder had significantly higher sexual distress and lower sexual function compared to participants without a personality disorder. Second, path analyses controlling for psychological distress, dyadic adjustment, and romantic attachment revealed that, for women, the Criterion B Intimacy Avoidance facet was consistently linked with higher sexual distress and lower sexual satisfaction and function. For men, result patterns were more complex, linking Criterion B Separation Insecurity with high sexual distress, and Separation Insecurity and Intimacy Avoidance facets with low sexual function. In addition, Criterion B Irresponsibility, Rigid Perfectionism, as well as Criterion A Intimacy impairment were linked with higher sexual satisfaction. These findings improve our understanding of the links between personality and sexual health and provide support for considering personality difficulties in sexual health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17171,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2024.2391340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored the relationships between sexual health indicators (i.e., sexual satisfaction, distress, and function) and the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, a promising dimensional framework for assessing personality pathology. A sample of 489 participants seeking help in private practice clinics completed self-report measures of sexual satisfaction, distress, and function, as well as dyadic adjustment, psychological distress, romantic attachment, personality impairment, and pathological personality facets. Results first showed that participants reaching the cutoffs for a personality disorder had significantly higher sexual distress and lower sexual function compared to participants without a personality disorder. Second, path analyses controlling for psychological distress, dyadic adjustment, and romantic attachment revealed that, for women, the Criterion B Intimacy Avoidance facet was consistently linked with higher sexual distress and lower sexual satisfaction and function. For men, result patterns were more complex, linking Criterion B Separation Insecurity with high sexual distress, and Separation Insecurity and Intimacy Avoidance facets with low sexual function. In addition, Criterion B Irresponsibility, Rigid Perfectionism, as well as Criterion A Intimacy impairment were linked with higher sexual satisfaction. These findings improve our understanding of the links between personality and sexual health and provide support for considering personality difficulties in sexual health interventions.

使用 DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型探索人格与性健康的关联。
本研究探讨了性健康指标(即性满意度、性困扰和性功能)与 DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型之间的关系。在私人诊所寻求帮助的 489 名参与者完成了性满意度、性困扰和性功能的自我报告测量,以及伴侣适应、心理困扰、恋爱依恋、人格损害和病态人格方面的自我报告测量。结果首先显示,与没有人格障碍的参与者相比,达到人格障碍临界值的参与者的性困扰和性功能明显较高。其次,在控制了心理困扰、二人关系调整和浪漫依恋的路径分析中发现,对于女性来说,标准 B 中的亲密关系回避刻面与较高的性困扰和较低的性满意度及性功能有着一致的联系。对于男性来说,结果模式更为复杂,标准 B 分离不安全感与高性困扰相关,分离不安全感和亲密关系回避面与低性功能相关。此外,标准 B 不负责任、刻板完美主义以及标准 A 亲密关系障碍与较高的性满意度有关。这些发现加深了我们对人格与性健康之间联系的理解,并为在性健康干预中考虑人格障碍提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy is one of the top independent journals in the field. Under the prestigious leadership of R. Taylor Seagraves, M.D. - one of the world" foremost experts in sex and marital therapy -- JSMT is an active and contemporary forum reflecting the most viable developments emanating from the U.S. and abroad. JSMT continues to break new ground with innovative research and clinical writing, and the editor is committed to showcasing the most far-reaching traditional and contemporary thinking from all sources. You will read about therapeutic techniques, outcome, special clinical and medical problems, and the theoretical parameters of sexual functioning, and marital relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信