Impact of interstitial lung disease gender-age-physiology index in surgically treated lung cancer.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Shinichi Sakamoto, Naoya Kawakita, Taihei Takeuchi, Hiroyuki Sumitomo, Naoki Miyamoto, Hiroaki Toba, Kazuya Kondo, Hiromitsu Takizawa
{"title":"Impact of interstitial lung disease gender-age-physiology index in surgically treated lung cancer.","authors":"Shinichi Sakamoto, Naoya Kawakita, Taihei Takeuchi, Hiroyuki Sumitomo, Naoki Miyamoto, Hiroaki Toba, Kazuya Kondo, Hiromitsu Takizawa","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02600-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The postoperative prognosis of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and lung cancer is poor. Recently, the ILD-gender-age-physiology (GAP) index was identified as a clinical prognostic factor for patients with ILD. This study investigated the ILD-GAP index and oncological factors regarding postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 87 lung cancer patients with comorbid ILD who underwent curative resection at our institution between April 2005 and December 2019. Short-term postoperative outcomes and overall survival (OS) based on the ILD-GAP index were examined. OS rates after surgery were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and group differences were analyzed using the Log-Rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses for OS were performed using the Cox regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analyses revealed ILD-GAP index ≥ 4 [Hazard ratio, 3.349; 95% confidence interval 1.375-8.155; P = 0.008] as a factor associated with OS. In the ILD-GAP index ≥ 4 group, no deaths occurred from primary lung cancer, with respiratory-related deaths being the most common, and exacerbation of ILD was more frequent (P = 0.007). Regarding perioperative results, a significant difference was observed in 90-day mortality (2.7% vs. 23.0% [P = 0.022]), and more patients required home oxygen therapy (14.9% vs. 69.2% [P < 0.001]) in the ILD-GAP index ≥ 4 group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An ILD-GAP index ≥ 4 indicated a poor prognostic factor for patients with surgically treated lung cancer. Careful consideration of surgical indications is essential for patients with an ILD-GAP index ≥ 4.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1475-1482"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02600-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The postoperative prognosis of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and lung cancer is poor. Recently, the ILD-gender-age-physiology (GAP) index was identified as a clinical prognostic factor for patients with ILD. This study investigated the ILD-GAP index and oncological factors regarding postoperative outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 87 lung cancer patients with comorbid ILD who underwent curative resection at our institution between April 2005 and December 2019. Short-term postoperative outcomes and overall survival (OS) based on the ILD-GAP index were examined. OS rates after surgery were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and group differences were analyzed using the Log-Rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses for OS were performed using the Cox regression model.

Results: Multivariate analyses revealed ILD-GAP index ≥ 4 [Hazard ratio, 3.349; 95% confidence interval 1.375-8.155; P = 0.008] as a factor associated with OS. In the ILD-GAP index ≥ 4 group, no deaths occurred from primary lung cancer, with respiratory-related deaths being the most common, and exacerbation of ILD was more frequent (P = 0.007). Regarding perioperative results, a significant difference was observed in 90-day mortality (2.7% vs. 23.0% [P = 0.022]), and more patients required home oxygen therapy (14.9% vs. 69.2% [P < 0.001]) in the ILD-GAP index ≥ 4 group.

Conclusions: An ILD-GAP index ≥ 4 indicated a poor prognostic factor for patients with surgically treated lung cancer. Careful consideration of surgical indications is essential for patients with an ILD-GAP index ≥ 4.

Abstract Image

间质性肺病性别-年龄-生理学指数对手术治疗肺癌的影响。
背景:间质性肺病(ILD)和肺癌患者的术后预后较差。最近,ILD-性别-年龄-生理学(GAP)指数被认为是ILD患者的临床预后因素。本研究调查了ILD-GAP指数和肿瘤因素对术后结果的影响:我们回顾性研究了 2005 年 4 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在我院接受根治性切除术的 87 例合并 ILD 的肺癌患者。根据ILD-GAP指数检查了术后短期预后和总生存率(OS)。术后OS率采用Kaplan-Meier法计算,组间差异采用Log-Rank检验分析。采用Cox回归模型对OS进行单变量和多变量分析:多变量分析显示,ILD-GAP指数≥4[危险比为3.349;95%置信区间为1.375-8.155;P = 0.008]是与OS相关的因素。在ILD-GAP指数≥4组中,没有人死于原发性肺癌,最常见的是呼吸系统相关死亡,ILD加重的情况更常见(P = 0.007)。在围手术期结果方面,观察到90天死亡率有显著差异(2.7% vs. 23.0% [P = 0.022]),需要家庭氧疗的患者更多(14.9% vs. 69.2% [P 结论:ILD-GAP指数≥0.007[P = 0.007]):ILD-GAP指数≥4表明接受手术治疗的肺癌患者预后不良。对于ILD-GAP指数≥4的患者来说,慎重考虑手术适应症至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信