Jennifer Cheung, Krista Dobo, Shaofei Zhang, Raphael Nudelman, Friedemann Schmidt, Jan Wenzel, Andreas Czich, Maik Schuler
{"title":"Evaluation of the nitrosamine impurities of ACE inhibitors using computational, in vitro, and in vivo methods demonstrate no genotoxic potential","authors":"Jennifer Cheung, Krista Dobo, Shaofei Zhang, Raphael Nudelman, Friedemann Schmidt, Jan Wenzel, Andreas Czich, Maik Schuler","doi":"10.1002/em.22618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evaluation and mitigation of the potential carcinogenic risks associated with nitrosamines in marketed pharmaceutical products are areas of interest for pharmaceutical companies and health authorities alike. Significant progress has been made to establish acceptable intake (AI) levels for <i>N</i>-nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities (NDSRIs) using SAR, however some compounds require experimental data to support derivation of a recommended AI. Many angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, identified by the suffix “pril,” have secondary amines that can potentially react to form nitrosamines. Here we consider a structural assessment and metabolism data, coupled with comprehensive in vitro and in vivo (mouse) genotoxicity testing to evaluate this particular class of nitrosamines. <i>N</i>-nitroso ramipril and <i>N</i>-nitroso quinapril, both of which are predicted to have inhibited nitrosamine bioactivation due to steric hinderance and branching at the α-position were non-genotoxic in the in vivo liver comet assay and non-mutagenic in the in vivo Big Blue® mutation and duplex sequencing assays. Predicted metabolism along with in vitro metabolism data and quantum chemical calculations related to DNA interactions offer a molecular basis for the negative results observed in both in vitro and in vivo testing. These nitrosamines are concluded to be non-mutagenic and non-carcinogenic; therefore, they should be controlled according to ICH Q3B guidance. Furthermore, these results for <i>N</i>-nitroso ramipril and <i>N</i>-nitroso quinapril should be considered when evaluating the appropriate AI and control strategy for other structurally similar “pril” NDSRIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/em.22618","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/em.22618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Evaluation and mitigation of the potential carcinogenic risks associated with nitrosamines in marketed pharmaceutical products are areas of interest for pharmaceutical companies and health authorities alike. Significant progress has been made to establish acceptable intake (AI) levels for N-nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities (NDSRIs) using SAR, however some compounds require experimental data to support derivation of a recommended AI. Many angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, identified by the suffix “pril,” have secondary amines that can potentially react to form nitrosamines. Here we consider a structural assessment and metabolism data, coupled with comprehensive in vitro and in vivo (mouse) genotoxicity testing to evaluate this particular class of nitrosamines. N-nitroso ramipril and N-nitroso quinapril, both of which are predicted to have inhibited nitrosamine bioactivation due to steric hinderance and branching at the α-position were non-genotoxic in the in vivo liver comet assay and non-mutagenic in the in vivo Big Blue® mutation and duplex sequencing assays. Predicted metabolism along with in vitro metabolism data and quantum chemical calculations related to DNA interactions offer a molecular basis for the negative results observed in both in vitro and in vivo testing. These nitrosamines are concluded to be non-mutagenic and non-carcinogenic; therefore, they should be controlled according to ICH Q3B guidance. Furthermore, these results for N-nitroso ramipril and N-nitroso quinapril should be considered when evaluating the appropriate AI and control strategy for other structurally similar “pril” NDSRIs.
评估和降低上市药品中亚硝胺的潜在致癌风险是制药公司和卫生部门共同关注的领域。利用 SAR 方法确定 N-亚硝胺药物物质相关杂质 (NDSRI) 的可接受摄入量 (AI) 水平的工作已取得重大进展,但有些化合物需要实验数据来支持推荐 AI 的推导。许多以 "pril "为后缀的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂都含有可能发生反应形成亚硝胺的仲胺。在此,我们考虑了结构评估和代谢数据,以及全面的体外和体内(小鼠)遗传毒性测试,以评估这一类特殊的亚硝胺。据预测,N-亚硝基雷米普利和 N-亚硝基喹那普利都会因α位的立体阻碍和分支而抑制亚硝胺的生物活化,但在体内肝彗星试验中没有遗传毒性,在体内 Big Blue® 突变和双链测序试验中也没有致突变性。预测的新陈代谢以及与 DNA 相互作用相关的体外新陈代谢数据和量子化学计算为体外和体内测试中观察到的阴性结果提供了分子基础。这些亚硝胺被认定为非致畸和非致癌物质;因此,应根据 ICH Q3B 指南对其进行控制。此外,在评估其他结构类似的 "pril "NDSRIs 的适当 AI 和控制策略时,应考虑 N-亚硝基雷米普利和 N-亚硝基喹普利的这些结果。