Stational liturgy and the minority right to the city

IF 0.6 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
City & Society Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1111/ciso.12494
Christopher Sheklian
{"title":"Stational liturgy and the minority right to the city","authors":"Christopher Sheklian","doi":"10.1111/ciso.12494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Armenian Apostolic Christians in Istanbul implicitly assert their “right to the city” through the liturgical itinerary that moves around the megalopolis of Istanbul. Though the right to the city has been taken up in a plethora of ways, its applicability to religion and religious practices is underexplored. While many Armenians in the Republic of Turkey explicitly take up the language of rights, the urban liturgical movements described in this article do not sit easily with either ideas of universal human rights or the minority rights framework operative in the Republic of Turkey. The concept of the right to the city, which already sits at the limits of conventional notions of rights, helps articulate how these religious practices claim an urban minority presence. By considering Armenian Christian liturgical practice in Istanbul simultaneously as “stational liturgy” and as a claim to the “right to the city,” this article offers an ethnographic account of urban minority presence-making that encounters the legal strictures of rights discourse without being fully enmeshed in them. In so doing, the article uses the ethnography to make a broader argument about the limits of rights discourse to account fully for forms of presence-making that are grounded in minority traditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46417,"journal":{"name":"City & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ciso.12494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Armenian Apostolic Christians in Istanbul implicitly assert their “right to the city” through the liturgical itinerary that moves around the megalopolis of Istanbul. Though the right to the city has been taken up in a plethora of ways, its applicability to religion and religious practices is underexplored. While many Armenians in the Republic of Turkey explicitly take up the language of rights, the urban liturgical movements described in this article do not sit easily with either ideas of universal human rights or the minority rights framework operative in the Republic of Turkey. The concept of the right to the city, which already sits at the limits of conventional notions of rights, helps articulate how these religious practices claim an urban minority presence. By considering Armenian Christian liturgical practice in Istanbul simultaneously as “stational liturgy” and as a claim to the “right to the city,” this article offers an ethnographic account of urban minority presence-making that encounters the legal strictures of rights discourse without being fully enmeshed in them. In so doing, the article uses the ethnography to make a broader argument about the limits of rights discourse to account fully for forms of presence-making that are grounded in minority traditions.

圣事礼仪与少数人的城市权利
伊斯坦布尔的亚美尼亚使徒基督徒通过在伊斯坦布尔这座大都市中穿梭的礼仪行程,含蓄地宣示了他们的 "城市权"。尽管 "城市权 "已被广泛应用,但其在宗教和宗教实践中的适用性却未得到充分探讨。虽然土耳其共和国的许多亚美尼亚人明确使用了权利的语言,但本文所述的城市礼仪运动并不容易与土耳其共和国的普遍人权观念或少数群体权利框架相吻合。城市权的概念已经处于传统权利概念的边缘,它有助于阐明这些宗教活动是如何主张城市少数群体的存在的。通过将伊斯坦布尔的亚美尼亚基督教礼仪同时视为 "仪式礼仪 "和对 "城市权 "的诉求,本文提供了一个关于城市少数民族存在的人种学描述,该描述遇到了权利话语的法律限制,但又没有完全陷入其中。在此过程中,文章利用人种学研究提出了一个更广泛的论点,即权利话语在充分说明以少数群体传统为基础的存在形式方面存在着局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
City & Society
City & Society ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: City & Society, the journal of the Society for Urban, National and Transnational/Global Anthropology, is intended to foster debate and conceptual development in urban, national, and transnational anthropology, particularly in their interrelationships. It seeks to promote communication with related disciplines of interest to members of SUNTA and to develop theory from a comparative perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信