A new video laryngoscope combined with flexible laryngeal mask insertion: A prospective randomized study

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Zhihao Zheng MSc , Xiaodong Liang MD, PhD , Jinrui Li MSc , Ying Li MSc , Liwei Bi MD, PhD , Wei Sun MD, PhD , Zhanfei Hu MD, PhD , Jiannan Song MD, PhD , Qi Zhou MD, PhD , Haibo Li MD, PhD
{"title":"A new video laryngoscope combined with flexible laryngeal mask insertion: A prospective randomized study","authors":"Zhihao Zheng MSc ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Liang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jinrui Li MSc ,&nbsp;Ying Li MSc ,&nbsp;Liwei Bi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Wei Sun MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Zhanfei Hu MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jiannan Song MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Qi Zhou MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Haibo Li MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The video laryngoscope (VLS) has been proven to be an effective insertion device for airway management. However, no laryngoscope has been specifically designed for the placement of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA). We improved the current VLS and developed a novel VLS method. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of an improved VLS for inserting a flexible laryngeal mask airway (F-LMA) compared with the standard blind method.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred and fifty-seven patients who underwent F-LMA insertion under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to either the standard blind insertion technique (group B) or VLS -assisted insertion (group VL). First attempt success rates were recorded. Secondary outcomes included oropharyngeal leakage pressure (OLP), fiberoptic view, insertion time, position adjustment, reinsertion rate, and postoperative airway morbidity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The first-attempt success rate was higher in group VL than that in group B (99% vs. 86%; <em>p</em> = 0.002). The OLP was significantly higher in the VLS-guided technique (26.4 ± 5.1 vs 23.8 ± 4.4 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, <em>p</em> = 0.002). The fiberoptic view was significantly better in the group VL (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and required less readjustment and reinsertion to establish an effective airway (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The insertion time was shorter in the group B than that in group VL (33.9 vs 41.3 s, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Hemodynamic stress responses and postoperative airway complications did not differ between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The new VLS-guided insertion technology has a high success rate, achieves greater OLP, and provides an ideal anatomical position with minimal adjustment, without increasing the risk of hemodynamic stress or adverse events.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2300075866; <span><span>https://www.chictr.org.cn</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 111590"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The video laryngoscope (VLS) has been proven to be an effective insertion device for airway management. However, no laryngoscope has been specifically designed for the placement of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA). We improved the current VLS and developed a novel VLS method. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of an improved VLS for inserting a flexible laryngeal mask airway (F-LMA) compared with the standard blind method.

Methods

One hundred and fifty-seven patients who underwent F-LMA insertion under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to either the standard blind insertion technique (group B) or VLS -assisted insertion (group VL). First attempt success rates were recorded. Secondary outcomes included oropharyngeal leakage pressure (OLP), fiberoptic view, insertion time, position adjustment, reinsertion rate, and postoperative airway morbidity.

Results

The first-attempt success rate was higher in group VL than that in group B (99% vs. 86%; p = 0.002). The OLP was significantly higher in the VLS-guided technique (26.4 ± 5.1 vs 23.8 ± 4.4 cmH2O, p = 0.002). The fiberoptic view was significantly better in the group VL (p < 0.001) and required less readjustment and reinsertion to establish an effective airway (p < 0.001). The insertion time was shorter in the group B than that in group VL (33.9 vs 41.3 s, p < 0.001). Hemodynamic stress responses and postoperative airway complications did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusions

The new VLS-guided insertion technology has a high success rate, achieves greater OLP, and provides an ideal anatomical position with minimal adjustment, without increasing the risk of hemodynamic stress or adverse events.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2300075866; https://www.chictr.org.cn).

新型视频喉镜与柔性喉罩插入术的结合:前瞻性随机研究
背景视频喉镜 (VLS) 已被证明是气道管理的有效插入设备。然而,目前还没有专门设计用于置入喉罩通气道(LMA)的喉镜。我们改进了现有的 VLS,并开发了一种新型 VLS 方法。本研究旨在评估改进后的 VLS 与标准盲法相比在插入软喉面罩通气道 (F-LMA) 方面的临床疗效。方法将 157 名在全身麻醉下接受 F-LMA 插入手术的患者随机分配到标准盲法插入技术组(B 组)或 VLS 辅助插入技术组(VL 组)。记录首次尝试成功率。次要结果包括口咽漏压(OLP)、光纤视野、插入时间、体位调整、重新插入率和术后气道发病率。VLS 引导技术的 OLP 明显更高(26.4 ± 5.1 vs 23.8 ± 4.4 cmH2O,p = 0.002)。VL 组的纤支镜视野明显更好(p < 0.001),重新调整和重新插入以建立有效气道所需的时间也更短(p < 0.001)。B 组的插入时间比 VL 组短(33.9 秒 vs 41.3 秒,p < 0.001)。结论新型 VLS 引导插入技术成功率高,可实现更大的 OLP,并提供理想的解剖位置,只需极少调整,不会增加血流动力学压力或不良事件的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信