Kinetic Profiling of RAS Mutations With Circulating Tumor DNA in the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.26 Trial Suggests the Loss of RAS Mutations in Neo-RAS-Wildtype Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Is Transient.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Florence T H Wu, James T Topham, Chris J O'Callaghan, Harriet Feilotter, Hagen F Kennecke, Leylah Drusbosky, Daniel J Renouf, Derek J Jonker, Dongsheng Tu, Eric X Chen, Jonathan M Loree
{"title":"Kinetic Profiling of <i>RAS</i> Mutations With Circulating Tumor DNA in the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.26 Trial Suggests the Loss of <i>RAS</i> Mutations in Neo-<i>RAS</i>-Wildtype Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Is Transient.","authors":"Florence T H Wu, James T Topham, Chris J O'Callaghan, Harriet Feilotter, Hagen F Kennecke, Leylah Drusbosky, Daniel J Renouf, Derek J Jonker, Dongsheng Tu, Eric X Chen, Jonathan M Loree","doi":"10.1200/PO.24.00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), <i>RAS</i> mutations drive resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. It is unclear whether <i>RAS</i> mutations ever become clonally undetectable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CO.26 was a phase II clinical trial that assessed durvalumab + tremelimumab in heavily pretreated mCRC. <i>RAS</i> mutation status was tracked over time using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing at baseline, week 8, and on progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 95 patients with <i>KRAS/NRAS</i> mutations in their archival tumor tissue, 6.3% (6/95) had undetectable <i>RAS</i> mutations in ctDNA collected at baseline or week 8 of the CO.26 study. Of these, 67% (4/6) of disappearances were transient, with the same mutation reappearing with progressive disease. In three cases, the simultaneous persistence of other preexisting CRC-associated truncal mutations could not be demonstrated, suggestive of low tumor shedding of ctDNA, leaving the incidence of true clonal reversion to <i>RAS</i>-wildtype (WT) possibly as low as 3.2% (3/95). Fewer patients in the neo-<i>RAS</i>-WT group (33%) had greater than four lesions at trial baseline compared with patients with persistent <i>RAS</i> mutations (75%), <i>P</i> = .046. The likelihood of synchronous metastases at cancer diagnosis (33% <i>v</i> 63%; <i>P</i> = .15) or liver metastases at trial baseline (50% <i>v</i> 68.5%; <i>P</i> = .17) was not significantly different between patients with disappearing versus persistent <i>RAS</i> mutations. Overall survival from stage IV diagnosis (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.35 to 1.72]; <i>P</i> = .52) was not significantly different between those with disappearing versus persistent <i>RAS</i> mutations. The disappearance of <i>RAS</i> mutations was not associated with primary tumor sidedness (<i>P</i> = .41), archival <i>BRAF/MEK/ERK</i>-mutant status (<i>P</i> = .16/1.00/.09), nor baseline ctDNA <i>HER2</i> amplifications (<i>P</i> = 1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified a 3.2%-6.3% prevalence of the neo-<i>RAS</i>-WT phenomenon in the CO.26 trial. However, 67% of apparent cases were transient with subsequent re-emergence.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400031"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), RAS mutations drive resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. It is unclear whether RAS mutations ever become clonally undetectable.

Methods: CO.26 was a phase II clinical trial that assessed durvalumab + tremelimumab in heavily pretreated mCRC. RAS mutation status was tracked over time using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing at baseline, week 8, and on progression.

Results: Among the 95 patients with KRAS/NRAS mutations in their archival tumor tissue, 6.3% (6/95) had undetectable RAS mutations in ctDNA collected at baseline or week 8 of the CO.26 study. Of these, 67% (4/6) of disappearances were transient, with the same mutation reappearing with progressive disease. In three cases, the simultaneous persistence of other preexisting CRC-associated truncal mutations could not be demonstrated, suggestive of low tumor shedding of ctDNA, leaving the incidence of true clonal reversion to RAS-wildtype (WT) possibly as low as 3.2% (3/95). Fewer patients in the neo-RAS-WT group (33%) had greater than four lesions at trial baseline compared with patients with persistent RAS mutations (75%), P = .046. The likelihood of synchronous metastases at cancer diagnosis (33% v 63%; P = .15) or liver metastases at trial baseline (50% v 68.5%; P = .17) was not significantly different between patients with disappearing versus persistent RAS mutations. Overall survival from stage IV diagnosis (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.35 to 1.72]; P = .52) was not significantly different between those with disappearing versus persistent RAS mutations. The disappearance of RAS mutations was not associated with primary tumor sidedness (P = .41), archival BRAF/MEK/ERK-mutant status (P = .16/1.00/.09), nor baseline ctDNA HER2 amplifications (P = 1.00).

Conclusion: We identified a 3.2%-6.3% prevalence of the neo-RAS-WT phenomenon in the CO.26 trial. However, 67% of apparent cases were transient with subsequent re-emergence.

加拿大癌症试验小组 CO.26 试验中利用循环肿瘤 DNA 对 RAS 基因突变进行的动力学分析表明,新 RAS 野生型转移性结直肠癌中 RAS 基因突变的缺失是短暂的。
目的:在转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)中,RAS突变会导致患者对抗表皮生长因子受体抗体产生耐药性。目前还不清楚RAS突变是否会导致克隆检测不到:CO.26是一项II期临床试验,评估了杜伐单抗+曲妥珠单抗在重度预处理mCRC中的疗效。在基线、第8周和进展期使用循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)测序对RAS突变状态进行长期追踪:在存档肿瘤组织中存在 KRAS/NRAS 突变的 95 例患者中,6.3%(6/95)在 CO.26 研究的基线或第 8 周采集的 ctDNA 中检测不到 RAS 突变。其中,67%(4/6)的突变消失是短暂的,随着疾病的进展,同一突变会再次出现。在三个病例中,无法证明同时存在其他先前存在的与 CRC 相关的截断突变,这表明肿瘤脱落的 ctDNA 很低,因此真正克隆还原为 RAS-野生型(WT)的发生率可能低至 3.2%(3/95)。与RAS突变持续存在的患者(75%)相比,新RAS-WT组在试验基线时病变超过4个的患者较少(33%),P = .046。癌症诊断时同步转移的可能性(33% 对 63%;P = .15)或试验基线时肝脏转移的可能性(50% 对 68.5%;P = .17)在RAS突变消失和持续存在的患者之间没有显著差异。从 IV 期诊断开始的总生存期(危险比为 0.77 [95% CI, 0.35 至 1.72];P = .52)在 RAS 突变消失与持续存在的患者之间没有明显差异。RAS突变的消失与原发肿瘤的偏侧(P = .41)、存档的BRAF/MEK/ERK突变状态(P = .16/1.00/.09)以及基线ctDNA HER2扩增(P = 1.00)无关:我们在CO.26试验中发现新RAS-WT现象的发生率为3.2%-6.3%。结论:我们在 CO.26 试验中发现了 3.2%-6.3% 的新 RAS-WT 现象,但 67% 的明显病例是一过性的,随后又重新出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信