Racial and Ethnic Differences in Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Care.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pascal Owusu-Agyemang, Olakunle Idowu, Arun Muthukumar, Juan Jose Guerra-Londono, Techecia Idowu, Nancy N Diaz, Lei Feng, Malachi Miller, Satvik Gundre, Crystal Wright, Juan P Cata
{"title":"Racial and Ethnic Differences in Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Care.","authors":"Pascal Owusu-Agyemang, Olakunle Idowu, Arun Muthukumar, Juan Jose Guerra-Londono, Techecia Idowu, Nancy N Diaz, Lei Feng, Malachi Miller, Satvik Gundre, Crystal Wright, Juan P Cata","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racial and ethnic differences in health care may result in significant morbidity. The objective of this study was to determine whether there was an association between a patient's race or ethnicity and the receipt of an antiemetic agent preoperatively, during surgery, and in the recovery room.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-institution retrospective study of adult patients (>18 years) who had undergone cancer-related operating room procedures under anesthesia between March 2016 and August 2021 was conducted. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to estimate the effects of covariates on antiemetic administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 60,595 patients included in the study, 3053 (5.0%) self-identified as Asian, 5376 (8.9%) as Black, 8431 (13.9%) as Hispanic or Latino, 42,533 (70.2%) as White, and 1202 (2.0%) as belonging to another racial or ethnic group. Multivariable analyses showed significant associations between a patient's race or ethnicity and the receipt of antiemetics in the preoperative holding area, operating room, and recovery room (all P < .001). In the preoperative holding area, White patients (8962 of 42,533 [21.1%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.188; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.100-1.283; P < .001) had higher odds of receiving an antiemetic than Black patients (1006 of 5376 [18.7%]). Intraoperatively, the odds were significantly greater for Hispanic or Latino (7323 of 8431 [86.9%]; OR, 1.175; 95% CI, 1.065-1.297; P = .001) and patients who identified as belonging to another race (1078 of 1202 [89.7%]; OR, 1.582; 95% CI, 1.290-1.941; P < .001) than for Black patients (4468 of 5376 [83.1%]). In the recovery room, Asian (499 of 3053 [16.3%]; OR, 1.328; 95% CI: 1.127-1.561; P < .001), Hispanic or Latino (1335 of 8431 [15.8%]; OR, 1.208; 95% CI, 1.060-1.377; P < .005), and White patients (6533 of 42,533 [15.4%]; OR, 1.276; 95% CI, 1.140-1.427; P < .001) had significantly higher odds of receiving antiemetics than Black patients (646 of 5376 [12%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective study suggests significant differences between the administrations of antiemetics to patients of different races or ethnicities, with Black patients often being less likely to receive an antiemetic than patients belonging to all other races or ethnicities.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Racial and ethnic differences in health care may result in significant morbidity. The objective of this study was to determine whether there was an association between a patient's race or ethnicity and the receipt of an antiemetic agent preoperatively, during surgery, and in the recovery room.

Methods: A single-institution retrospective study of adult patients (>18 years) who had undergone cancer-related operating room procedures under anesthesia between March 2016 and August 2021 was conducted. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to estimate the effects of covariates on antiemetic administration.

Results: Of the 60,595 patients included in the study, 3053 (5.0%) self-identified as Asian, 5376 (8.9%) as Black, 8431 (13.9%) as Hispanic or Latino, 42,533 (70.2%) as White, and 1202 (2.0%) as belonging to another racial or ethnic group. Multivariable analyses showed significant associations between a patient's race or ethnicity and the receipt of antiemetics in the preoperative holding area, operating room, and recovery room (all P < .001). In the preoperative holding area, White patients (8962 of 42,533 [21.1%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.188; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.100-1.283; P < .001) had higher odds of receiving an antiemetic than Black patients (1006 of 5376 [18.7%]). Intraoperatively, the odds were significantly greater for Hispanic or Latino (7323 of 8431 [86.9%]; OR, 1.175; 95% CI, 1.065-1.297; P = .001) and patients who identified as belonging to another race (1078 of 1202 [89.7%]; OR, 1.582; 95% CI, 1.290-1.941; P < .001) than for Black patients (4468 of 5376 [83.1%]). In the recovery room, Asian (499 of 3053 [16.3%]; OR, 1.328; 95% CI: 1.127-1.561; P < .001), Hispanic or Latino (1335 of 8431 [15.8%]; OR, 1.208; 95% CI, 1.060-1.377; P < .005), and White patients (6533 of 42,533 [15.4%]; OR, 1.276; 95% CI, 1.140-1.427; P < .001) had significantly higher odds of receiving antiemetics than Black patients (646 of 5376 [12%]).

Conclusions: This retrospective study suggests significant differences between the administrations of antiemetics to patients of different races or ethnicities, with Black patients often being less likely to receive an antiemetic than patients belonging to all other races or ethnicities.

术后恶心呕吐护理中的种族和民族差异。
背景:医疗保健中的种族和民族差异可能会导致严重的发病率。本研究的目的是确定患者的种族或民族与术前、术中和恢复室接受止吐药之间是否存在关联:对2016年3月至2021年8月期间在麻醉状态下接受癌症相关手术室治疗的成年患者(大于18岁)进行了一项单一机构回顾性研究。采用多变量逻辑回归模型来估计协变量对止吐药使用的影响:在纳入研究的60595名患者中,有3053人(5.0%)自我认定为亚裔,5376人(8.9%)为黑人,8431人(13.9%)为西班牙裔或拉丁裔,42533人(70.2%)为白人,1202人(2.0%)属于其他种族或族裔。多变量分析表明,患者的种族或族裔与术前留置区、手术室和恢复室接受止吐药的情况有显著关联(P 均小于 0.001)。在术前留置区,白人患者(42533人中有8962人[21.1%];几率比[OR],1.188;95%置信区间[CI],1.100-1.283;P < .001)接受止吐药的几率高于黑人患者(5376人中有1006人[18.7%])。术中,西班牙裔或拉丁裔患者(8431 例中的 7323 例 [86.9%];OR,1.175;95% CI,1.065-1.297;P = .001)和自称属于其他种族的患者(1202 例中的 1078 例 [89.7%];OR,1.582;95% CI,1.290-1.941;P < .001)接受止吐药的几率明显高于黑人患者(5376 例中的 4468 例 [83.1%])。在恢复室中,亚裔(3053 人中有 499 人 [16.3%];OR,1.328;95% CI:1.127-1.561;P < .001)、西班牙裔或拉丁裔(8431 人中有 1335 人 [15.8%];OR,1.208;95% CI,1.060-1.377;P < .005)和白人患者(42533 人中的 6533 人 [15.4%];OR,1.276;95% CI,1.140-1.427;P < .001)接受止吐药的几率明显高于黑人患者(5376 人中的 646 人 [12%]):这项回顾性研究表明,不同种族或族裔的患者在使用止吐药方面存在显著差异,黑人患者接受止吐药的几率往往低于其他种族或族裔的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信