Continuous daily sampling of airborne eDNA detects all vertebrate species identified by camera traps

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Environmental DNA Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1002/edn3.591
Marcel Polling, Ralph Buij, Ivo Laros, G. Arjen de Groot
{"title":"Continuous daily sampling of airborne eDNA detects all vertebrate species identified by camera traps","authors":"Marcel Polling,&nbsp;Ralph Buij,&nbsp;Ivo Laros,&nbsp;G. Arjen de Groot","doi":"10.1002/edn3.591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ongoing pressures on global biodiversity require conservation action that is not possible without effective biomonitoring. Terrestrial vertebrate surveys are commonly performed using camera traps, a time-intensive method known to miss many small or arboreal species and birds. Recent advances have shown airborne eDNA to be a potentially suitable technique to more effectively monitor vertebrate communities in a time- and cost-effective manner. Here, we test whether commercially available air samplers that collect air particles 24/7 during a 1-week period can be used to detect the presence of vertebrates through airborne eDNA. The results are compared to camera trap records at three locations with differing habitats in the Netherlands. Simultaneous sampling with three different air samplers for 3 weeks resulted in detection of 154 vertebrate taxa, of which the majority were birds or mammals (113 and 33 species, respectively), along with four fish and four amphibian species. All species observed using camera traps were also retrieved via airborne eDNA, although not on every day of sampling. The Burkard spore trap, used routinely for pollen monitoring, showed the highest number of vertebrate species, and only in three samples when a mammal species was detected using a camera trap it remained undetected via eDNA. We also detected unique species at the three locations using airborne eDNA, indicative of the habitat in which they were living. However, we also detected species that we could not account for. The multitude of species found using airborne eDNA compared to camera traps indicate the sensitivity of the method; however, subsequent studies should prioritize validation of these findings through alternative biomonitoring approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.591","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ongoing pressures on global biodiversity require conservation action that is not possible without effective biomonitoring. Terrestrial vertebrate surveys are commonly performed using camera traps, a time-intensive method known to miss many small or arboreal species and birds. Recent advances have shown airborne eDNA to be a potentially suitable technique to more effectively monitor vertebrate communities in a time- and cost-effective manner. Here, we test whether commercially available air samplers that collect air particles 24/7 during a 1-week period can be used to detect the presence of vertebrates through airborne eDNA. The results are compared to camera trap records at three locations with differing habitats in the Netherlands. Simultaneous sampling with three different air samplers for 3 weeks resulted in detection of 154 vertebrate taxa, of which the majority were birds or mammals (113 and 33 species, respectively), along with four fish and four amphibian species. All species observed using camera traps were also retrieved via airborne eDNA, although not on every day of sampling. The Burkard spore trap, used routinely for pollen monitoring, showed the highest number of vertebrate species, and only in three samples when a mammal species was detected using a camera trap it remained undetected via eDNA. We also detected unique species at the three locations using airborne eDNA, indicative of the habitat in which they were living. However, we also detected species that we could not account for. The multitude of species found using airborne eDNA compared to camera traps indicate the sensitivity of the method; however, subsequent studies should prioritize validation of these findings through alternative biomonitoring approaches.

Abstract Image

每天对空气中的 eDNA 进行连续采样,检测照相陷阱确定的所有脊椎动物物种
全球生物多样性面临的持续压力要求采取保护行动,而没有有效的生物监测是不可能做到的。陆地脊椎动物调查通常使用相机陷阱,这种耗时的方法会漏掉许多小型或树栖物种和鸟类。最近的进展表明,空气传播的 eDNA 是一种潜在的合适技术,能以省时、经济的方式更有效地监测脊椎动物群落。在这里,我们测试了在一周时间内全天候收集空气微粒的市售空气采样器是否可用于通过空气传播的 eDNA 检测脊椎动物的存在。我们将结果与荷兰三个不同栖息地的相机陷阱记录进行了比较。使用三种不同的空气采样器同时采样 3 周后,共检测到 154 个脊椎动物类群,其中大部分是鸟类或哺乳动物(分别为 113 种和 33 种),还有 4 种鱼类和 4 种两栖动物。使用照相机诱捕器观察到的所有物种也都通过空气传播的 eDNA 进行了检索,尽管不是每天都进行采样。常规用于花粉监测的伯卡德孢子捕集器显示了最多的脊椎动物物种,只有在三个样本中使用相机捕集器发现了哺乳动物物种,但通过 eDNA 仍未发现。我们还利用空气传播的 eDNA 在三个地点检测到了独特的物种,这表明了它们的生活栖息地。不过,我们也发现了一些无法解释的物种。与相机捕获法相比,使用机载 eDNA 发现的物种数量众多,这表明了该方法的灵敏度;不过,后续研究应优先考虑通过其他生物监测方法来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信