Siblings at home: Moderating influence of sibling presence and composition on the relation between problem behaviors and theory of mind in early childhood

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
{"title":"Siblings at home: Moderating influence of sibling presence and composition on the relation between problem behaviors and theory of mind in early childhood","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the prevalence of internalizing and externalizing difficulties in children, the impact of these problem behaviors on the development of important social cognitive skills, such as Theory of Mind (ToM), is not well-understood. Indeed, many studies that have explored relations between problem behaviors and ToM report inconsistent findings. A possible reason for these disparities may be a lack of accounting for social protective factors within the home, such as the presence and number of siblings. Here, we explored the moderating influence of sibling presence and number on the relation between problem behaviors (i.e., internalizing and externalizing) and ToM. A total of 184 children (88 boys; <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 64.6 months, <em>SD =</em> 10.39) completed six well-validated ToM tasks while mothers reported on their children’s externalizing and internalizing behaviors. Children who had siblings living in the same home exhibited higher ToM than children without siblings. In addition, both sibling presence and number of siblings moderated the relation between children’s externalizing behaviors and ToM, such that in children without siblings externalizing behaviors were negatively associated with ToM. In contrast, children with siblings had similar ToM regardless of externalizing behaviors. As well, children with relatively fewer siblings and higher externalizing behaviors displayed lower ToM than children with relatively more siblings and higher externalizing behaviors. We did not detect a moderating effect of sibling presence or number on the relation between internalizing behaviors and ToM. These findings provide support for siblings’ protective utility within the context of children’s social cognition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524001681/pdfft?md5=1eecd1c775503efc50108d36114d68d0&pid=1-s2.0-S0022096524001681-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524001681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the prevalence of internalizing and externalizing difficulties in children, the impact of these problem behaviors on the development of important social cognitive skills, such as Theory of Mind (ToM), is not well-understood. Indeed, many studies that have explored relations between problem behaviors and ToM report inconsistent findings. A possible reason for these disparities may be a lack of accounting for social protective factors within the home, such as the presence and number of siblings. Here, we explored the moderating influence of sibling presence and number on the relation between problem behaviors (i.e., internalizing and externalizing) and ToM. A total of 184 children (88 boys; Mage = 64.6 months, SD = 10.39) completed six well-validated ToM tasks while mothers reported on their children’s externalizing and internalizing behaviors. Children who had siblings living in the same home exhibited higher ToM than children without siblings. In addition, both sibling presence and number of siblings moderated the relation between children’s externalizing behaviors and ToM, such that in children without siblings externalizing behaviors were negatively associated with ToM. In contrast, children with siblings had similar ToM regardless of externalizing behaviors. As well, children with relatively fewer siblings and higher externalizing behaviors displayed lower ToM than children with relatively more siblings and higher externalizing behaviors. We did not detect a moderating effect of sibling presence or number on the relation between internalizing behaviors and ToM. These findings provide support for siblings’ protective utility within the context of children’s social cognition.

家中的兄弟姐妹:兄弟姐妹的存在和组成对幼儿期问题行为和心智理论之间关系的调节作用
尽管儿童普遍存在内化和外化困难,但这些问题行为对重要的社会认知技能(如心智理论(ToM))发展的影响却不甚了解。事实上,许多探讨问题行为与心智理论之间关系的研究都得出了不一致的结论。造成这些差异的一个可能原因是没有考虑到家庭中的社会保护因素,如兄弟姐妹的存在和数量。在此,我们探讨了兄弟姐妹的存在和数量对问题行为(即内化和外化)与 ToM 之间关系的调节作用。共有 184 名儿童(88 名男孩;年龄 = 64.6 个月,标准差 = 10.39)完成了六项经过严格验证的 ToM 任务,而母亲则报告了孩子的外化和内化行为。与没有兄弟姐妹的儿童相比,有兄弟姐妹同住的儿童表现出更高的 ToM 能力。此外,有无兄弟姐妹和兄弟姐妹的数量都会调节儿童的外化行为与 ToM 之间的关系,因此没有兄弟姐妹的儿童的外化行为与 ToM 呈负相关。相比之下,有兄弟姐妹的儿童无论外化行为如何,其 ToM 都相似。同样,兄弟姐妹相对较少且外化行为较多的儿童的 ToM 也低于兄弟姐妹相对较多且外化行为较多的儿童。我们没有发现兄弟姐妹的存在或数量对内化行为和 ToM 之间的关系有调节作用。这些发现为兄弟姐妹在儿童社会认知方面的保护作用提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信