[Prophylaxis with tercef of infection-related complications after cesarean section].

Akusherstvo i ginekologiia Pub Date : 2001-01-01
A Dimitrov, M Pŭnevska, I Dikov, A Nikolov, I Kostov
{"title":"[Prophylaxis with tercef of infection-related complications after cesarean section].","authors":"A Dimitrov, M Pŭnevska, I Dikov, A Nikolov, I Kostov","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this prospective and case controlled study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis with Tercef (ceftriaxone) in women undergoing cesarean section and to compare the results with those of 24 hours regiment of Cefazolin and also with a group without prophylaxis. The study includes 122 cases of elective and emergency CS: 41 with a single intravenous dose of 1.0 g Tercef after clamping of the umbilical cord; 41 cases of antibiotic prophylaxis with Cefazolin three times 2.0 g for 24 hours and 40 low infectious risk CS without antibiotic prophylaxis. We take in account the existing before the CS risk factors for postoperative infectious complications as: hours of PROM; length of labor, number of vaginal examinations before CS, previous sections, duration of the operation, anemia, bacteriuria and diabetes. For post CS infection-related complications we take: febrile morbidity, endometritis, wound infections, infection of urinary tract. The results show infection complication in the three groups as follow: 14.6% for tercef, 17.1% for cefazolin and 20.0% for the group without antibiotic. There is not statistically significant difference. According our study in cases of CS with increased risk of post-operative infectious complications the antibiotic prophylaxis reduce the rate of infection-related complications even below that of CS with low infectious risk. The single dose of 1 g tercef i.v. is effective and suitable in comparison with 24 hours regiment of cefazolin.</p>","PeriodicalId":520075,"journal":{"name":"Akusherstvo i ginekologiia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akusherstvo i ginekologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective and case controlled study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis with Tercef (ceftriaxone) in women undergoing cesarean section and to compare the results with those of 24 hours regiment of Cefazolin and also with a group without prophylaxis. The study includes 122 cases of elective and emergency CS: 41 with a single intravenous dose of 1.0 g Tercef after clamping of the umbilical cord; 41 cases of antibiotic prophylaxis with Cefazolin three times 2.0 g for 24 hours and 40 low infectious risk CS without antibiotic prophylaxis. We take in account the existing before the CS risk factors for postoperative infectious complications as: hours of PROM; length of labor, number of vaginal examinations before CS, previous sections, duration of the operation, anemia, bacteriuria and diabetes. For post CS infection-related complications we take: febrile morbidity, endometritis, wound infections, infection of urinary tract. The results show infection complication in the three groups as follow: 14.6% for tercef, 17.1% for cefazolin and 20.0% for the group without antibiotic. There is not statistically significant difference. According our study in cases of CS with increased risk of post-operative infectious complications the antibiotic prophylaxis reduce the rate of infection-related complications even below that of CS with low infectious risk. The single dose of 1 g tercef i.v. is effective and suitable in comparison with 24 hours regiment of cefazolin.

[使用特西福预防剖宫产术后感染相关并发症]。
这项前瞻性病例对照研究的目的是确定使用特西福(头孢曲松)对剖宫产产妇进行抗生素预防治疗的有效性和安全性,并将结果与头孢唑啉 24 小时方案以及未进行预防治疗组进行比较。这项研究包括 122 例择期和急诊剖腹产:41 例在夹闭脐带后单次静脉注射 1.0 克特罗凯;41 例在 24 小时内使用 3 次 2.0 克头孢唑啉进行抗生素预防;40 例未使用抗生素预防的低感染风险剖腹产。我们在 CS 前就考虑到了术后感染并发症的风险因素,如:PROM 小时数、产程长短、CS 前阴道检查次数、既往剖宫产次数、手术时间、贫血、菌尿和糖尿病。在 CS 术后感染相关并发症中,我们将发热、子宫内膜炎、伤口感染和尿路感染作为并发症。结果显示,三组的感染并发症情况如下:使用特西福的组为 14.6%,使用头孢唑啉的组为 17.1%,未使用抗生素的组为 20.0%。在统计学上没有明显差异。根据我们的研究,对于术后感染并发症风险较高的 CS,抗生素预防可降低感染相关并发症的发生率,甚至低于感染风险较低的 CS。与头孢唑啉 24 小时方案相比,单剂量 1 克特塞福静脉注射是有效和合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信