Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Guoying Feng, Yi Feng, Shu Yao, Xun Huang, Zuxiang Peng, Yongliang Tang, Wen Tang, Zhengyan Li, Hanchen Wang, Hongming Liu
{"title":"Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Guoying Feng, Yi Feng, Shu Yao, Xun Huang, Zuxiang Peng, Yongliang Tang, Wen Tang, Zhengyan Li, Hanchen Wang, Hongming Liu","doi":"10.5152/tjg.2024.23228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) compared to TACE monotherapy for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases until September 1, 2023. Our analysis included 7 cohort studies encompassing a total of 630 patients. The results demonstrated that the TACE plus HAIC group exhibited significantly improved prognosis compared to the TACE alone group, as evidenced by superior rates of complete response, partial response, progressive disease, objective response rate, and disease control rate. Moreover, the TACE group displayed a lower risk of platelet reduction and vomiting when compared to the TACE plus HAIC group. None of the 7 studies reported any intervention-related mortality. In conclusion, the combination of TACE and HAIC may be recommended as a viable option for patients with unresectable HCC, given its evident enhancements in survival and tumor response rates without significant differences in adverse events when compared to TACE monotherapy. Nevertheless, additional randomized controlled trials and studies involving Western cohorts are warranted to further validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":"35 4","pages":"266-279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2024.23228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) compared to TACE monotherapy for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases until September 1, 2023. Our analysis included 7 cohort studies encompassing a total of 630 patients. The results demonstrated that the TACE plus HAIC group exhibited significantly improved prognosis compared to the TACE alone group, as evidenced by superior rates of complete response, partial response, progressive disease, objective response rate, and disease control rate. Moreover, the TACE group displayed a lower risk of platelet reduction and vomiting when compared to the TACE plus HAIC group. None of the 7 studies reported any intervention-related mortality. In conclusion, the combination of TACE and HAIC may be recommended as a viable option for patients with unresectable HCC, given its evident enhancements in survival and tumor response rates without significant differences in adverse events when compared to TACE monotherapy. Nevertheless, additional randomized controlled trials and studies involving Western cohorts are warranted to further validate these findings.

经导管动脉化疗栓塞术联合肝动脉灌注化疗与经导管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗无法切除的肝细胞癌:系统综述与元分析》(Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemootherapy Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis)。
在这项研究中,我们评估了经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)治疗不可切除性肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效和安全性。截至 2023 年 9 月 1 日,我们在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中系统检索了相关研究。我们的分析包括 7 项队列研究,共涉及 630 名患者。结果表明,与单纯 TACE 组相比,TACE 加 HAIC 组的预后明显改善,这体现在完全反应率、部分反应率、疾病进展率、客观反应率和疾病控制率均优于单纯 TACE 组。此外,与 TACE 加 HAIC 组相比,TACE 组出现血小板减少和呕吐的风险更低。7 项研究均未报告与干预相关的死亡率。总之,与 TACE 单药治疗相比,TACE 和 HAIC 联合治疗可明显提高患者的生存率和肿瘤反应率,且不良反应无明显差异,因此可推荐将其作为不可切除的 HCC 患者的可行选择。不过,还需要更多的随机对照试验和涉及西方国家组群的研究来进一步验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信