Midterm Outcome of Branch Vessel Stenting for Superior Mesenteric Artery Malperfusion Complicating with Acute Aortic Dissection.

Kensuke Uotani, Masato Yamaguchi, Takuya Okada, Tomoyuki Gentsu, Noriaki Sakamoto, Ryota Kawasaki, Takanori Taniguchi, Hirotaka Tomimatsu, Koji Sugimoto, Takamichi Murakami
{"title":"Midterm Outcome of Branch Vessel Stenting for Superior Mesenteric Artery Malperfusion Complicating with Acute Aortic Dissection.","authors":"Kensuke Uotani, Masato Yamaguchi, Takuya Okada, Tomoyuki Gentsu, Noriaki Sakamoto, Ryota Kawasaki, Takanori Taniguchi, Hirotaka Tomimatsu, Koji Sugimoto, Takamichi Murakami","doi":"10.22575/interventionalradiology.2022-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the midterm stent patency and patient prognosis after stenting for superior mesenteric artery malperfusion complicating with acute aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirteen patients who underwent branch vessel stenting for superior mesenteric artery malperfusion between 2011 and 2021 in six institutions were retrospectively reviewed. By comparing pre- and postoperative computed tomography scans in the same plane, the length of the stent implanted in the superior mesenteric artery and the stent-to-vessel diameter ratio were measured. The technical and clinical success of stenting, midterm patient prognosis, and stent patency were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Superior mesenteric artery stenting was technically successful in 12 patients (92.3%). The mean length of the stents implanted in the superior mesenteric artery was 61.3 ± 39.4 mm (range, 14-127 mm). The mean proximal and distal stent-to-vessel diameter ratios were 1.02 ± 0.16 and 1.30 ± 0.42, respectively. A weak correlation was found between the length of the stents implanted in the superior mesenteric artery and the distal stent-to-vessel diameter ratio (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.34). Two major complications occurred, one of which resulted in death within 30 days, and 12 (92.3%) were clinically successful. Of these 12 patients, no recurrent intestinal ischemia occurred during the follow-up duration (mean, 45.2 months). Partial occlusion of the stent distal edge without intestinal ischemia was observed in one patient (distal stent-to-vessel diameter ratio = 2.33) 42 months after stenting. The overall survival rate and primary stent patency rate were 84.6% and 91.7%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Midterm stent patency and survival after superior mesenteric artery stenting for malperfusion were acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":73503,"journal":{"name":"Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan)","volume":"9 2","pages":"55-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11336238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22575/interventionalradiology.2022-0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the midterm stent patency and patient prognosis after stenting for superior mesenteric artery malperfusion complicating with acute aortic dissection.

Material and methods: Thirteen patients who underwent branch vessel stenting for superior mesenteric artery malperfusion between 2011 and 2021 in six institutions were retrospectively reviewed. By comparing pre- and postoperative computed tomography scans in the same plane, the length of the stent implanted in the superior mesenteric artery and the stent-to-vessel diameter ratio were measured. The technical and clinical success of stenting, midterm patient prognosis, and stent patency were evaluated.

Results: Superior mesenteric artery stenting was technically successful in 12 patients (92.3%). The mean length of the stents implanted in the superior mesenteric artery was 61.3 ± 39.4 mm (range, 14-127 mm). The mean proximal and distal stent-to-vessel diameter ratios were 1.02 ± 0.16 and 1.30 ± 0.42, respectively. A weak correlation was found between the length of the stents implanted in the superior mesenteric artery and the distal stent-to-vessel diameter ratio (R2 = 0.34). Two major complications occurred, one of which resulted in death within 30 days, and 12 (92.3%) were clinically successful. Of these 12 patients, no recurrent intestinal ischemia occurred during the follow-up duration (mean, 45.2 months). Partial occlusion of the stent distal edge without intestinal ischemia was observed in one patient (distal stent-to-vessel diameter ratio = 2.33) 42 months after stenting. The overall survival rate and primary stent patency rate were 84.6% and 91.7%, respectively.

Conclusions: Midterm stent patency and survival after superior mesenteric artery stenting for malperfusion were acceptable.

为急性主动脉夹层并发肠系膜上动脉灌注不良的分支血管支架植入术的中期效果。
目的:研究急性主动脉夹层并发肠系膜上动脉灌注不良支架术后的中期支架通畅率和患者预后:回顾性研究了2011年至2021年期间在6家医疗机构接受肠系膜上动脉错构瘤分支血管支架植入术的13例患者。通过比较术前和术后同一平面的计算机断层扫描,测量了植入肠系膜上动脉支架的长度和支架与血管直径比。对支架植入的技术和临床成功率、患者的中期预后以及支架的通畅性进行了评估:结果:12 名患者(92.3%)的肠系膜上动脉支架植入术获得了技术上的成功。植入肠系膜上动脉支架的平均长度为 61.3 ± 39.4 毫米(范围为 14-127 毫米)。支架近端和远端与血管的平均直径比分别为 1.02 ± 0.16 和 1.30 ± 0.42。在肠系膜上动脉植入的支架长度与远端支架与血管直径比之间存在微弱的相关性(R2 = 0.34)。发生了两例重大并发症,其中一例导致患者在30天内死亡,12例(92.3%)患者临床治疗成功。在这 12 名患者中,随访期间(平均 45.2 个月)未再发生肠缺血。一名患者在支架植入 42 个月后出现支架远端边缘部分闭塞,但未出现肠缺血(支架远端与血管直径比 = 2.33)。总生存率和主要支架通畅率分别为 84.6% 和 91.7%:结论:肠系膜上动脉支架置入术治疗肠系膜上动脉灌注不良的中期支架通畅率和存活率均可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信