Efficacy of the Stripped AFX Aortic Cuff as a Scaffolding Bare Stent to Facilitate the Expansion of the Thoracoabdominal and Visceral Aorta during Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection.

Shinichi Iwakoshi, Shoji Sakaguchi, Mai Murata, Tomoki Nagata, Akimitsu Tanaka, Ryosuke Kametani, Arisa Kameda, Shinsaku Maeda, Takeshi Sato, Hideyuki Nishiofuku, Shigeo Ichihashi, Toshihiro Tanaka, Kimihiko Kichikawa
{"title":"Efficacy of the Stripped AFX Aortic Cuff as a Scaffolding Bare Stent to Facilitate the Expansion of the Thoracoabdominal and Visceral Aorta during Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection.","authors":"Shinichi Iwakoshi, Shoji Sakaguchi, Mai Murata, Tomoki Nagata, Akimitsu Tanaka, Ryosuke Kametani, Arisa Kameda, Shinsaku Maeda, Takeshi Sato, Hideyuki Nishiofuku, Shigeo Ichihashi, Toshihiro Tanaka, Kimihiko Kichikawa","doi":"10.22575/interventionalradiology.2022-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>During thoracic endovascular aortic repair for complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection, large bare stent placement for the abdominal aorta is sometimes necessary. In smaller abdominal aortic diameter cases, we used the stripped AFX aortic cuff as a scaffolding bare stent rather than the Zenith Dissection Endovascular Stent, which is a commercially available, large bare stent. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of the stripped AFX aortic cuff and experiments were conducted to compare the stripped AFX and the Zenith Dissection Endovascular Stent.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>The type B aortic dissection patients treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair using stripped AFX at three institutions between January 2014 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data, including technical success, perioperative complication, and overall survival, were evaluated. The experiment assessed the chronic outward force that reflected the load acting on the artery wall from the stent.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Eight cases (seven males) were reviewed. The median (interquartile range, IQR) age of the patients was 60 years (46.3-70.3). The technical success rate was 100%, and no perioperative complications were observed. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 28.9 months (17.5-31.5). During the follow-up, one patient died of septic shock unrelated to aortic events. The median (IQR) diameter of the stripped AFX on the last follow-up CT was 23.5 mm (21.9-25.0). The chronic outward force of the Zenith Dissection Endovascular Stent was two to three times that of the stripped AFX.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The stripped AFX aortic cuff is feasible and safe as a scaffolding stent during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for Stanford Type B aortic dissection.</p>","PeriodicalId":73503,"journal":{"name":"Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11336237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22575/interventionalradiology.2022-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: During thoracic endovascular aortic repair for complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection, large bare stent placement for the abdominal aorta is sometimes necessary. In smaller abdominal aortic diameter cases, we used the stripped AFX aortic cuff as a scaffolding bare stent rather than the Zenith Dissection Endovascular Stent, which is a commercially available, large bare stent. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of the stripped AFX aortic cuff and experiments were conducted to compare the stripped AFX and the Zenith Dissection Endovascular Stent.

Material and method: The type B aortic dissection patients treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair using stripped AFX at three institutions between January 2014 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data, including technical success, perioperative complication, and overall survival, were evaluated. The experiment assessed the chronic outward force that reflected the load acting on the artery wall from the stent.

Result: Eight cases (seven males) were reviewed. The median (interquartile range, IQR) age of the patients was 60 years (46.3-70.3). The technical success rate was 100%, and no perioperative complications were observed. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 28.9 months (17.5-31.5). During the follow-up, one patient died of septic shock unrelated to aortic events. The median (IQR) diameter of the stripped AFX on the last follow-up CT was 23.5 mm (21.9-25.0). The chronic outward force of the Zenith Dissection Endovascular Stent was two to three times that of the stripped AFX.

Conclusions: The stripped AFX aortic cuff is feasible and safe as a scaffolding stent during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for Stanford Type B aortic dissection.

在胸腔内血管主动脉修复术治疗并发斯坦福B型主动脉夹层时,将剥离的AFX主动脉袖带作为支架裸支架以促进胸腹主动脉和内脏主动脉扩张的疗效。
目的:在对复杂的斯坦福B型主动脉夹层进行胸腔内主动脉修复时,有时需要在腹主动脉放置大型裸支架。在腹主动脉直径较小的病例中,我们使用剥离式 AFX 主动脉袖带作为支架裸支架,而不是使用 Zenith 夹层血管内支架,后者是一种市售的大型裸支架。在这项研究中,我们评估了剥离式 AFX 主动脉袖带的可行性,并对剥离式 AFX 和 Zenith 夹层血管内支架进行了比较实验:回顾性审查了2014年1月至2017年12月期间三家机构使用剥脱式AFX进行胸腔内血管主动脉修复治疗的B型主动脉夹层患者。评估了临床数据,包括技术成功率、围术期并发症和总生存率。实验评估了反映支架作用于动脉壁负荷的慢性向外力:结果:共审查了 8 个病例(7 名男性)。中位数(四分位数间距,IQR)年龄为 60 岁(46.3-70.3)。技术成功率为 100%,未发现围手术期并发症。随访时间的中位数(IQR)为 28.9 个月(17.5-31.5)。随访期间,一名患者死于与主动脉事件无关的脓毒性休克。在最后一次随访 CT 中,剥离的 AFX 的中位(IQR)直径为 23.5 毫米(21.9-25.0)。Zenith 夹层血管内支架的慢性向外力是剥离式 AFX 的两到三倍:结论:在斯坦福B型主动脉夹层的胸腔内血管主动脉修复术中,剥离AFX主动脉袖带作为支架是可行且安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信