Greater Postoperative Biceps Tendon Migration Following Biceps Tenodesis Correlates with Lower Patient Reported Outcomes Scores.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Brian Forsythe, Elyse J Berlinberg, Daanish Khazi-Syed, Harsh H Patel, Enrico M Forlenza, Kelechi R Okoroha, Brady T Williams, Adam B Yanke, Brian J Cole, Nikhil N Verma
{"title":"Greater Postoperative Biceps Tendon Migration Following Biceps Tenodesis Correlates with Lower Patient Reported Outcomes Scores.","authors":"Brian Forsythe, Elyse J Berlinberg, Daanish Khazi-Syed, Harsh H Patel, Enrico M Forlenza, Kelechi R Okoroha, Brady T Williams, Adam B Yanke, Brian J Cole, Nikhil N Verma","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the relationship between tendon migration, as measured by radiostereometric analysis (RSA), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following biceps tenodesis (BT); to determine the likelihood of achieving clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) following BT; and to identify factors that impact CSO achievement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing arthroscopic suprapectoral or open subpectoral BT at a single, high-volume academic medical center were prospectively enrolled. A tantalum bead sutured to the tenodesis construct was utilized as a radio-opaque marker. Biceps tendon migration was measured on calibrated radiographs at 12 weeks postoperatively. PROMs (Constant-Murley score [Constant], Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation [SANE], and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systemic-Upper Extremity [PROMIS-UE]) were collected preoperatively and at ≥2 years follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 115 patients enrolled, 94 (82%) patients were included (median age=52 years and BMI=31.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). At a mean follow-up of 2.9 years, median Constant, SANE, and PROMIS-UE were 33 (interquartile range [IQR]=26-35), 90 (IQR=80-99), and 47 (IQR=42-58), respectively. Median tantalum bead migration was 6.5 mm (IQR 1.8-13.8). There was a significant correlation between migration and Constant (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.222, beta= -0.554, 95% CI -1.027- [-0.081], P=0.022), SANE (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.238, beta= -0.198, 95% CI -0.337 - [-0.058], P=0.006) and PROMIS-UE (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.233, beta= -0.406, 95% CI -0.707 - [-0.104], P=0.009). In univariable analysis, higher BMI was associated with achievement of substantial clinical benefit (SCB, unadj-OR=1.078, 95%CI 1.007-1.161, P=0.038). Greater bead migration was negatively associated with achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID, unadj-OR=0.969, 95% CI 0.943-0.993, P=0.014) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS, unadj-OR 0.965, 95% CI 0.937-0.989, P=0.008) on all 3 instruments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 1 cm-increase in tenodesed biceps tendon migration was associated with a decrease in Constant, SANE, and PROMIS-UE of 6, 2, and 4 points, respectively, at a mean of 2.9 years after surgery. Most patients achieved clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) for these PROMs by latest follow-up, and greater biceps tendon construct migration was negatively associated with the likelihood of CSO achievement.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV, retrospective case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the relationship between tendon migration, as measured by radiostereometric analysis (RSA), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following biceps tenodesis (BT); to determine the likelihood of achieving clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) following BT; and to identify factors that impact CSO achievement.

Methods: Patients undergoing arthroscopic suprapectoral or open subpectoral BT at a single, high-volume academic medical center were prospectively enrolled. A tantalum bead sutured to the tenodesis construct was utilized as a radio-opaque marker. Biceps tendon migration was measured on calibrated radiographs at 12 weeks postoperatively. PROMs (Constant-Murley score [Constant], Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation [SANE], and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systemic-Upper Extremity [PROMIS-UE]) were collected preoperatively and at ≥2 years follow-up.

Results: Of 115 patients enrolled, 94 (82%) patients were included (median age=52 years and BMI=31.4 kg/m2). At a mean follow-up of 2.9 years, median Constant, SANE, and PROMIS-UE were 33 (interquartile range [IQR]=26-35), 90 (IQR=80-99), and 47 (IQR=42-58), respectively. Median tantalum bead migration was 6.5 mm (IQR 1.8-13.8). There was a significant correlation between migration and Constant (r2 = 0.222, beta= -0.554, 95% CI -1.027- [-0.081], P=0.022), SANE (r2 = 0.238, beta= -0.198, 95% CI -0.337 - [-0.058], P=0.006) and PROMIS-UE (r2 = 0.233, beta= -0.406, 95% CI -0.707 - [-0.104], P=0.009). In univariable analysis, higher BMI was associated with achievement of substantial clinical benefit (SCB, unadj-OR=1.078, 95%CI 1.007-1.161, P=0.038). Greater bead migration was negatively associated with achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID, unadj-OR=0.969, 95% CI 0.943-0.993, P=0.014) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS, unadj-OR 0.965, 95% CI 0.937-0.989, P=0.008) on all 3 instruments.

Conclusion: A 1 cm-increase in tenodesed biceps tendon migration was associated with a decrease in Constant, SANE, and PROMIS-UE of 6, 2, and 4 points, respectively, at a mean of 2.9 years after surgery. Most patients achieved clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) for these PROMs by latest follow-up, and greater biceps tendon construct migration was negatively associated with the likelihood of CSO achievement.

Level of evidence: IV, retrospective case series.

肱二头肌腱鞘切除术后肱二头肌肌腱移位较多与患者报告结果评分较低有关。
目的:评估肱二头肌腱鞘切除术(BT)后通过放射性立体计量分析(RSA)测量的肌腱移位与患者报告的结果指标(PROMs)之间的关系;确定BT术后实现具有临床意义的结果(CSOs)的可能性;并确定影响实现CSOs的因素:方法: 前瞻性地招募了在一家高容量学术医疗中心接受关节镜胸骨上或胸骨下开放式 BT 的患者。将一颗钽珠缝合到腱鞘构造上作为放射性不透明标记。肱二头肌肌腱移位在术后12周的校准X光片上进行测量。术前和随访≥2年时收集PROMs(Constant-Murley评分[Constant]、单一评估数值评价[SANE]和患者报告结果测量信息系统-上肢[PROMIS-UE]):在 115 名登记患者中,94 名(82%)患者被纳入(中位年龄=52 岁,体重指数=31.4 kg/m2)。在平均 2.9 年的随访中,Constant、SANE 和 PROMIS-UE 的中位数分别为 33(四分位距 [IQR]=26-35 )、90(IQR=80-99)和 47(IQR=42-58)。钽珠移位的中位数为 6.5 毫米(IQR=1.8-13.8)。迁移与Constant(r2 = 0.222,beta= -0.554,95% CI -1.027- [-0.081],P=0.022)、SANE(r2 = 0.238,beta= -0.198,95% CI -0.337 - [-0.058],P=0.006)和PROMIS-UE(r2 = 0.233,beta= -0.406,95% CI -0.707 - [-0.104],P=0.009)之间存在明显相关性。在单变量分析中,较高的体重指数与获得实质性临床获益(SCB,unadj-OR=1.078,95%CI 1.007-1.161,P=0.038)相关。在所有 3 种工具中,更大程度的微珠移位与最小临床意义差异(MCID,unadj-OR=0.969,95% CI 0.943-0.993,P=0.014)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS,unadj-OR 0.965,95% CI 0.937-0.989,P=0.008)的实现呈负相关:结论:术后平均 2.9 年,腱鞘肱二头肌肌腱移位每增加 1 厘米,Constant、SANE 和 PROMIS-UE 分别下降 6 分、2 分和 4 分。大多数患者在最近一次随访时在这些PROMs中取得了有临床意义的结果(CSOs),肱二头肌肌腱结构移位的程度与取得CSO的可能性呈负相关:证据级别:IV,回顾性病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信