Comparison of biological augmentation in rotator cuff repair using inflamed versus non-inflamed bursal tissue in rats.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
A Z Zhang, A Ficklscherer, T R Niethammer, M Woiczinski, P Davies-Knorr, B M Holzapfel, P E Müller
{"title":"Comparison of biological augmentation in rotator cuff repair using inflamed versus non-inflamed bursal tissue in rats.","authors":"A Z Zhang, A Ficklscherer, T R Niethammer, M Woiczinski, P Davies-Knorr, B M Holzapfel, P E Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine how augmentation of a rotator cuff repair with inflamed versus non-inflamed bursal tissue affects tendon-to-bone healing in a rat model of rotator cuff repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>136 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to an inflamed or non-inflamed bursal tissue application group. After detachment the supraspinatus tendon was re-attached with bursal tissue sewn onto the tendon-to-bone interface. The specimens were analysed biomechanically 6 and at 7 weeks and immunohistologically at 1 and at 7 weeks after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Immunohistological results showed no significant difference in the percentage of collagen type II in the tendon-to-bone interface at 1 (p = 0.97) and 7 weeks (p = 0.42) when utilising autologous non-inflamed bursal tissue in comparison to inflamed bursal tissue specimens. The inflamed bursa group also showed no significant difference in collagen I to III quotient (p= 0.14) after surgery in comparison to post-surgery non-inflamed bursa groups. Biomechanical assessment showed that tendon stiffness (p = 0.87 resp. p = 0.1) and the tendon viscoelasticity (p = 0.12 resp. p = 0.07) was the same after 6 and 7 weeks comparing inflamed bursa to the non-inflamed bursa group. There was no significant difference (p = 0.8 resp. p = 0.97) in load to failure between in both inflamed and non-inflamed bursa groups after 6 and 7 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Autologous inflamed bursal tissue derived from the Achilles bursa and implanted to the tendon-to-bone interface after rotator cuff repair facilitates the same histological and biomechanical healing response as using a non-inflamed bursa interposition in rats.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>During augmentation of a rotator cuff repair, it is irrelevant whether the bursa tissue is inflamed or not.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine how augmentation of a rotator cuff repair with inflamed versus non-inflamed bursal tissue affects tendon-to-bone healing in a rat model of rotator cuff repair.

Methods: 136 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to an inflamed or non-inflamed bursal tissue application group. After detachment the supraspinatus tendon was re-attached with bursal tissue sewn onto the tendon-to-bone interface. The specimens were analysed biomechanically 6 and at 7 weeks and immunohistologically at 1 and at 7 weeks after surgery.

Results: Immunohistological results showed no significant difference in the percentage of collagen type II in the tendon-to-bone interface at 1 (p = 0.97) and 7 weeks (p = 0.42) when utilising autologous non-inflamed bursal tissue in comparison to inflamed bursal tissue specimens. The inflamed bursa group also showed no significant difference in collagen I to III quotient (p= 0.14) after surgery in comparison to post-surgery non-inflamed bursa groups. Biomechanical assessment showed that tendon stiffness (p = 0.87 resp. p = 0.1) and the tendon viscoelasticity (p = 0.12 resp. p = 0.07) was the same after 6 and 7 weeks comparing inflamed bursa to the non-inflamed bursa group. There was no significant difference (p = 0.8 resp. p = 0.97) in load to failure between in both inflamed and non-inflamed bursa groups after 6 and 7 weeks.

Conclusion: Autologous inflamed bursal tissue derived from the Achilles bursa and implanted to the tendon-to-bone interface after rotator cuff repair facilitates the same histological and biomechanical healing response as using a non-inflamed bursa interposition in rats.

Clinical relevance: During augmentation of a rotator cuff repair, it is irrelevant whether the bursa tissue is inflamed or not.

在大鼠肩袖修复中使用发炎和未发炎滑囊组织进行生物增量的比较。
目的:在大鼠肩袖修复模型中,研究用发炎和未发炎的滑囊组织增强肩袖修复对肌腱与骨愈合的影响。方法:将 136 只 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠随机分配到发炎和未发炎的滑囊组织应用组。分离冈上肌腱后,将滑囊组织缝合在肌腱与骨的界面上。对标本进行了术后 6 周和 7 周的生物力学分析,以及术后 1 周和 7 周的免疫组织学分析:免疫组织学结果显示,在术后 1 周(p = 0.97)和 7 周(p = 0.42),使用自体非炎症滑囊组织与炎症滑囊组织标本相比,肌腱与骨界面中 II 型胶原蛋白的百分比无明显差异。与手术后的非发炎滑囊组相比,发炎滑囊组术后的胶原蛋白 I 至 III 商数也无明显差异(p= 0.14)。生物力学评估显示,6周和7周后,肌腱僵硬度(p = 0.87,p = 0.1)和肌腱粘弹性(p = 0.12,p = 0.07)与发炎滑囊组和未发炎滑囊组相比相同。6周和7周后,发炎滑囊组和未发炎滑囊组的破坏载荷无明显差异(p = 0.8 resp:结论:从跟腱滑囊中提取的自体发炎滑囊组织植入肩袖修复后的肌腱-骨界面,与在大鼠体内使用非发炎滑囊植入物相比,具有相同的组织学和生物力学愈合反应:临床相关性:在肩袖修复的增强过程中,滑囊组织是否发炎并不重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信