Oregon's Hospital Payment Cap and Enrollee Out-of-Pocket Spending and Service Use.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Roslyn C Murray, Edward C Norton, Andrew M Ryan
{"title":"Oregon's Hospital Payment Cap and Enrollee Out-of-Pocket Spending and Service Use.","authors":"Roslyn C Murray, Edward C Norton, Andrew M Ryan","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Enrollee cost-sharing and health insurance premiums have grown alongside rising hospital prices. To control prices and price growth, the Oregon State Employee plan instituted a cap on hospital facility payments in October 2019 that was found to reduce hospital prices. Yet the program's association with out-of-pocket spending and use among enrollees is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association of the Oregon State Employee Plan's hospital payment cap with out-of-pocket spending and changes in service use among state employees enrolled in higher cost-sharing plans.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Using data from the Oregon All Payer All Claims database (January 2014 to December 2021), a difference-in-differences analysis was conducted to examine the association of Oregon's hospital payment cap with enrollee out-of-pocket spending and service use. The main analysis focused on the outpatient setting, where there were significant declines in hospital prices. Changes in a subpopulation of employees enrolled in higher cost-sharing plans were also examined.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was outpatient out-of-pocket spending per procedure, which included the copayment, coinsurance, and/or deductible paid at the point of service. Changes in service use were also examined by counting the number of outpatient procedures received per enrollee per year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The outpatient sample included 1 094 083 procedures from 92 523 Oregon educators and 4 510 342 procedures from 473 621 control enrollees. During the period before implementation, Oregon educators had higher out-of-pocket spending per outpatient procedure than the control group ($69.26 vs $41.87). The hospital payment cap was associated with a $6.60, or 9.5%, reduction in out-of-pocket spending per procedure (95% CI, -12.7 to -0.5) and a 0.24, or 4.8%, increase in the number of outpatient procedures received per enrollee per year (95% CI, 0.09-0.39) among those in higher cost-sharing plans. Enrollees receiving outpatient services from October 2019 through December 2021 saved an estimated $1.8 million. However, savings for the state were $10.3 million less than they would have been absent increases in service use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The study findings suggest that enrollees may benefit from reduced out-of-pocket spending due to hospital price regulations, but states should be mindful that price regulations may inadvertently increase health care service use.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"5 8","pages":"e242614"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Enrollee cost-sharing and health insurance premiums have grown alongside rising hospital prices. To control prices and price growth, the Oregon State Employee plan instituted a cap on hospital facility payments in October 2019 that was found to reduce hospital prices. Yet the program's association with out-of-pocket spending and use among enrollees is unknown.

Objective: To assess the association of the Oregon State Employee Plan's hospital payment cap with out-of-pocket spending and changes in service use among state employees enrolled in higher cost-sharing plans.

Design, setting, and participants: Using data from the Oregon All Payer All Claims database (January 2014 to December 2021), a difference-in-differences analysis was conducted to examine the association of Oregon's hospital payment cap with enrollee out-of-pocket spending and service use. The main analysis focused on the outpatient setting, where there were significant declines in hospital prices. Changes in a subpopulation of employees enrolled in higher cost-sharing plans were also examined.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was outpatient out-of-pocket spending per procedure, which included the copayment, coinsurance, and/or deductible paid at the point of service. Changes in service use were also examined by counting the number of outpatient procedures received per enrollee per year.

Results: The outpatient sample included 1 094 083 procedures from 92 523 Oregon educators and 4 510 342 procedures from 473 621 control enrollees. During the period before implementation, Oregon educators had higher out-of-pocket spending per outpatient procedure than the control group ($69.26 vs $41.87). The hospital payment cap was associated with a $6.60, or 9.5%, reduction in out-of-pocket spending per procedure (95% CI, -12.7 to -0.5) and a 0.24, or 4.8%, increase in the number of outpatient procedures received per enrollee per year (95% CI, 0.09-0.39) among those in higher cost-sharing plans. Enrollees receiving outpatient services from October 2019 through December 2021 saved an estimated $1.8 million. However, savings for the state were $10.3 million less than they would have been absent increases in service use.

Conclusions and relevance: The study findings suggest that enrollees may benefit from reduced out-of-pocket spending due to hospital price regulations, but states should be mindful that price regulations may inadvertently increase health care service use.

俄勒冈州的医院支付上限与参保者的自付支出和服务使用。
重要性:在医院价格不断上涨的同时,参保者的费用分摊和健康保险保费也在增长。为控制价格和价格增长,俄勒冈州雇员计划于 2019 年 10 月设立了医院设施支付上限,该上限被认为可降低医院价格。然而,该计划与参保者的自费支出和使用情况之间的关系尚不清楚:目的:评估俄勒冈州雇员计划的医院支付上限与自付支出的关联性,以及参加较高费用分担计划的州雇员在服务使用方面的变化:利用俄勒冈州所有支付者所有索赔数据库(2014 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月)中的数据,进行了差异分析,以研究俄勒冈州医院支付上限与参保者自付支出和服务使用的关系。主要分析集中在门诊环境,因为在门诊环境中,医院价格出现了显著下降。此外,还研究了加入费用分担较高计划的雇员群体的变化情况:主要结果是门诊病人每次手术的自付费用,其中包括服务时支付的共付额、共同保险和/或免赔额。此外,还通过计算每位参保者每年接受的门诊手术次数来检验服务使用情况的变化:门诊病人样本包括 92 523 名俄勒冈州教育工作者的 1 094 083 次手术和 473 621 名对照组参保者的 4 510 342 次手术。在实施前,俄勒冈州教育工作者的每次门诊自付费用高于对照组(69.26 美元对 41.87 美元)。在费用分摊较高的计划中,医院支付上限使每个手术的自付费用减少了 6.6 美元,即 9.5%(95% CI,-12.7 至-0.5),并使每位参保者每年接受门诊手术的次数增加了 0.24 次,即 4.8%(95% CI,0.09-0.39)。2019 年 10 月至 2021 年 12 月期间接受门诊服务的参保者估计节省了 180 万美元。然而,与服务使用增加的情况相比,该州节省的费用减少了 1030 万美元:研究结果表明,参保者可能会因医院价格规定导致的自付费用减少而受益,但各州应注意价格规定可能会无意中增加医疗服务的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信