Attempt to engage, yet failure to obtain successful bowel cancer screening: more likely in Māori, Pacific peoples, Asians, men and high deprivation areas.
Chey G Dearing, Louise O'Connor, Georgia C Dearing, Bernard McEntee
{"title":"Attempt to engage, yet failure to obtain successful bowel cancer screening: more likely in Māori, Pacific peoples, Asians, men and high deprivation areas.","authors":"Chey G Dearing, Louise O'Connor, Georgia C Dearing, Bernard McEntee","doi":"10.26635/6965.6351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In New Zealand, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second highest cause of cancer death. We sought to characterise a unique population, the individuals who attempt to engage one or multiple times with screening yet fail to ever obtain successful screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional descriptive analysis on data from the New Zealand National Bowel Screening Programme 2012 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 7,000 individuals (1.26% of all participants) have attempted but failed to be successfully screened in the national bowel screening programme. Males compared with females (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.17), Asian (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.55-1.77), Māori (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.92-2.24) or Pacific peoples (OR 2.30, 95% CI 2.09-2.52) compared with Europeans had greater odds to attempt but fail to be screened. Māori New Zealand Index of Deprivation (NZDep) quintile five (most deprived) had 4.12 (95% CI 3.64-4.67, plt;0.0001) the odds to attempt but fail to be screened compared with European deprivation quintile one participants (least deprived).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are important variations in the failure to successfully receive CRC screening by gender, age, ethnicity, deprivation level and screening year. We suggest drop-off location checking services for all participants are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"137 1601","pages":"55-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: In New Zealand, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second highest cause of cancer death. We sought to characterise a unique population, the individuals who attempt to engage one or multiple times with screening yet fail to ever obtain successful screening.
Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive analysis on data from the New Zealand National Bowel Screening Programme 2012 to 2022.
Results: Over 7,000 individuals (1.26% of all participants) have attempted but failed to be successfully screened in the national bowel screening programme. Males compared with females (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.17), Asian (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.55-1.77), Māori (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.92-2.24) or Pacific peoples (OR 2.30, 95% CI 2.09-2.52) compared with Europeans had greater odds to attempt but fail to be screened. Māori New Zealand Index of Deprivation (NZDep) quintile five (most deprived) had 4.12 (95% CI 3.64-4.67, plt;0.0001) the odds to attempt but fail to be screened compared with European deprivation quintile one participants (least deprived).
Conclusions: There are important variations in the failure to successfully receive CRC screening by gender, age, ethnicity, deprivation level and screening year. We suggest drop-off location checking services for all participants are required.
目的:在新西兰,结直肠癌(CRC)是第二大癌症死因。我们试图描述一个特殊群体的特征,即试图参与一次或多次筛查,但从未成功筛查的人:这是一项横断面描述性分析,数据来自新西兰 2012 年至 2022 年国家肠道筛查计划:超过7000人(占所有参与者的1.26%)尝试过但未能成功通过国家肠道筛查计划的筛查。与欧洲人相比,男性(OR 1.11,95% CI 1.06-1.17)、亚裔(OR 1.65,95% CI 1.55-1.77)、毛利人(OR 2.07,95% CI 1.92-2.24)或太平洋岛屿族裔(OR 2.30,95% CI 2.09-2.52)尝试筛查但未能成功的几率更大。毛利人新西兰贫困指数(NZDep)五分位数(最贫困)与欧裔贫困五分位数一参与者(最不贫困)相比,尝试筛查但未能筛查的几率为4.12(95% CI 3.64-4.67,plt;0.0001):结论:不同性别、年龄、种族、贫困程度和筛查年份的人未能成功接受 CRC 筛查的几率存在很大差异。我们建议需要为所有参与者提供下车地点检查服务。