Patient and public involvement and engagement in the ASCEND PLUS trial: reflections from the design of a streamlined and decentralised clinical trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08393-2
Muram El-Nayir, Rohan Wijesurendra, David Preiss, Marion Mafham, Leandros Tsiotos, Sadman Islam, Anne Whitehouse, Sophia Wilkinson, Hannah Freeman, Ryonfa Lee, Wojciech Brudlo, Genna Bobby, Bryony Jenkins, Robert Humphrey, Amy Mallorie, Andrew Toal, Elnora C Barker, Dianna Moylan, Graeme Thomson, Firoza Davies, Hameed Khan, Ian Allotey, Susan Dickie, John Roberts
{"title":"Patient and public involvement and engagement in the ASCEND PLUS trial: reflections from the design of a streamlined and decentralised clinical trial.","authors":"Muram El-Nayir, Rohan Wijesurendra, David Preiss, Marion Mafham, Leandros Tsiotos, Sadman Islam, Anne Whitehouse, Sophia Wilkinson, Hannah Freeman, Ryonfa Lee, Wojciech Brudlo, Genna Bobby, Bryony Jenkins, Robert Humphrey, Amy Mallorie, Andrew Toal, Elnora C Barker, Dianna Moylan, Graeme Thomson, Firoza Davies, Hameed Khan, Ian Allotey, Susan Dickie, John Roberts","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08393-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>ASCEND PLUS is a randomised controlled trial assessing the effects of oral semaglutide on the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in around 20,000 individuals with type 2 diabetes in the UK. The trial's innovative design includes a decentralised direct-to-participant invitation, recruitment, and follow-up model, relying on self-completion of online forms or telephone or video calls with research nurses, with no physical sites. Extensive patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) was essential to the design and conduct of ASCEND PLUS.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To report the process and conduct of PPIE activity in ASCEND PLUS, evaluate effects on trial design, reflect critically on successes and aspects that could have been improved, and identify themes and learning relevant to implementation of PPIE in future trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PPIE activity was coordinated centrally and included six PPIE focus groups and creation of an ASCEND PLUS public advisory group (PAG) during the design phase. Recruitment to these groups was carefully considered to ensure diversity and inclusion, largely consisting of adults living with type 2 diabetes from across the UK. Two members of the PAG also joined the trial Steering Committee. Steering Committee meetings, focus groups, and PAG meetings were conducted online, with two hybrid workshops to discuss PPIE activity and aspects of the trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PPIE activity was critical to shaping the design and conduct of ASCEND PLUS. Key examples included supporting choice for participants to either complete the screening/consent process independently online, or during a telephone or video call interview with a research nurse. A concise 'initial information leaflet' was developed to be sent with the initial invitations, with the 'full' information leaflet sent later to those interested in joining the trial. The PAG reviewed the content and format of participant- and public-facing materials, including written documents, online screening forms, animated videos, and the trial website, to aid clarity and accessibility, and provided input into the choice of instruments to assess quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PPIE is integral in ASCEND PLUS and will continue throughout the trial. This involvement has been critical to optimising the trial design, successfully obtaining regulatory and ethical approval, and conducting the trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08393-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: ASCEND PLUS is a randomised controlled trial assessing the effects of oral semaglutide on the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in around 20,000 individuals with type 2 diabetes in the UK. The trial's innovative design includes a decentralised direct-to-participant invitation, recruitment, and follow-up model, relying on self-completion of online forms or telephone or video calls with research nurses, with no physical sites. Extensive patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) was essential to the design and conduct of ASCEND PLUS.

Aim: To report the process and conduct of PPIE activity in ASCEND PLUS, evaluate effects on trial design, reflect critically on successes and aspects that could have been improved, and identify themes and learning relevant to implementation of PPIE in future trials.

Methods: PPIE activity was coordinated centrally and included six PPIE focus groups and creation of an ASCEND PLUS public advisory group (PAG) during the design phase. Recruitment to these groups was carefully considered to ensure diversity and inclusion, largely consisting of adults living with type 2 diabetes from across the UK. Two members of the PAG also joined the trial Steering Committee. Steering Committee meetings, focus groups, and PAG meetings were conducted online, with two hybrid workshops to discuss PPIE activity and aspects of the trial.

Results: PPIE activity was critical to shaping the design and conduct of ASCEND PLUS. Key examples included supporting choice for participants to either complete the screening/consent process independently online, or during a telephone or video call interview with a research nurse. A concise 'initial information leaflet' was developed to be sent with the initial invitations, with the 'full' information leaflet sent later to those interested in joining the trial. The PAG reviewed the content and format of participant- and public-facing materials, including written documents, online screening forms, animated videos, and the trial website, to aid clarity and accessibility, and provided input into the choice of instruments to assess quality of life.

Conclusions: PPIE is integral in ASCEND PLUS and will continue throughout the trial. This involvement has been critical to optimising the trial design, successfully obtaining regulatory and ethical approval, and conducting the trial.

ASCEND PLUS 试验中的患者和公众参与:从简化和分散临床试验的设计中反思。
简介ASCEND PLUS 是一项随机对照试验,旨在评估口服塞马鲁肽对英国约 2 万名 2 型糖尿病患者心血管事件一级预防的效果。该试验的创新设计包括一种分散的直接面向参与者的邀请、招募和随访模式,依赖于在线表格的自我填写或与研究护士的电话或视频通话,没有实体试验点。广泛的患者和公众参与(PPIE)对ASCEND PLUS的设计和实施至关重要。目的:报告ASCEND PLUS中PPIE活动的过程和实施情况,评估对试验设计的影响,批判性地反思成功之处和可以改进的方面,并确定在未来试验中实施PPIE的相关主题和经验:PPIE活动由中央协调,包括六个PPIE焦点小组,并在设计阶段成立了ASCEND PLUS公众咨询小组(PAG)。这些小组的招募工作经过仔细考虑,以确保多样性和包容性,主要由英国各地的 2 型糖尿病成人患者组成。公众咨询小组的两名成员还加入了试验指导委员会。指导委员会会议、焦点小组会议和 PAG 会议均在网上举行,同时还举行了两次混合研讨会,讨论 PPIE 活动和试验的各个方面:PPIE 活动对 ASCEND PLUS 的设计和实施至关重要。主要例子包括支持参与者选择在线独立完成筛查/同意程序,或与研究护士进行电话或视频通话访谈。我们制作了一份简明的 "初始信息传单",随初始邀请函一起寄出,"完整 "信息传单稍后会寄给有兴趣参加试验的人。PAG 审查了面向参与者和公众的材料的内容和格式,包括书面文件、在线筛查表、动画视频和试验网站,以提高清晰度和可访问性,并为生活质量评估工具的选择提供意见:PPIE 是 ASCEND PLUS 试验不可或缺的一部分,并将贯穿整个试验过程。这种参与对于优化试验设计、成功获得监管和伦理批准以及开展试验至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信