Advancing spatial repellents for malaria control: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a spatial repellent under operational use in Northern Uganda-study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08378-1
Esther Nakyaze, Suzanne Van Hulle, John Hembling, Emmanuel Arinaitwe, Momar Mbodji, Mary Grace Alwano, Felly Christine Lamwaka, Stephen Tukwasibwe, Samuel Gonahasa, Fang Liu, John P Grieco, Nicole L Achee
{"title":"Advancing spatial repellents for malaria control: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a spatial repellent under operational use in Northern Uganda-study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Esther Nakyaze, Suzanne Van Hulle, John Hembling, Emmanuel Arinaitwe, Momar Mbodji, Mary Grace Alwano, Felly Christine Lamwaka, Stephen Tukwasibwe, Samuel Gonahasa, Fang Liu, John P Grieco, Nicole L Achee","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08378-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spatial repellents (SRs) have been widely used for the prevention of mosquito bites, and preliminary findings suggest efficacy against both malaria (1) and Aedes-borne viruses (2) but their effectiveness in reducing mosquito-borne diseases under operational use has never been evaluated. SRs have the potential of being critical tools in the prevention of mosquito-borne diseases in contexts where typical vector control strategies, such as insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying, are inaccessible or underutilized such as among displaced persons or in emergency relief settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children will be enrolled in 3 separate cohorts to establish the effectiveness of SRs in reducing malaria infection in different distribution channels. One cohort will estimate the direct effect of the SR distributed through a reference channel (study personnel distribution). The two remaining cohorts will estimate the protection of the SR distributed through a voucher channel and the Village Health Team channel. Cohorts will be followed twice a month (approximately every 15 days): during the first scheduled household visit in the month, a blood sample will be taken for malaria rapid diagnostic test (Monthly Visit #1); and, during the second scheduled household visit, a blood sample will only be taken if the participant has a recent history of fever (Monthly Visit #2). The incidence of malaria in each cohort will be estimated and compared to the reference cohort to determine the benefit of using a SR in an area with high, year-round transmission of malaria.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will address the knowledge gap of whether or not SRs are effective in reducing human malaria disease in humanitarian assistance and emergency response settings in sub-Saharan Africa where underlying transmission rates are historically high and ITNs may or may not be widely deployed. This research will inform policy makers on whether to recommend SRs as a means to further reduce malaria transmission for such operational programs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06122142. Registered on November 8, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08378-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spatial repellents (SRs) have been widely used for the prevention of mosquito bites, and preliminary findings suggest efficacy against both malaria (1) and Aedes-borne viruses (2) but their effectiveness in reducing mosquito-borne diseases under operational use has never been evaluated. SRs have the potential of being critical tools in the prevention of mosquito-borne diseases in contexts where typical vector control strategies, such as insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying, are inaccessible or underutilized such as among displaced persons or in emergency relief settings.

Methods: Children will be enrolled in 3 separate cohorts to establish the effectiveness of SRs in reducing malaria infection in different distribution channels. One cohort will estimate the direct effect of the SR distributed through a reference channel (study personnel distribution). The two remaining cohorts will estimate the protection of the SR distributed through a voucher channel and the Village Health Team channel. Cohorts will be followed twice a month (approximately every 15 days): during the first scheduled household visit in the month, a blood sample will be taken for malaria rapid diagnostic test (Monthly Visit #1); and, during the second scheduled household visit, a blood sample will only be taken if the participant has a recent history of fever (Monthly Visit #2). The incidence of malaria in each cohort will be estimated and compared to the reference cohort to determine the benefit of using a SR in an area with high, year-round transmission of malaria.

Discussion: This study will address the knowledge gap of whether or not SRs are effective in reducing human malaria disease in humanitarian assistance and emergency response settings in sub-Saharan Africa where underlying transmission rates are historically high and ITNs may or may not be widely deployed. This research will inform policy makers on whether to recommend SRs as a means to further reduce malaria transmission for such operational programs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06122142. Registered on November 8, 2023.

推进空间驱蚊剂对疟疾的控制:在乌干达北部实际使用的空间驱蚊剂的有效性和成本效益--集群随机对照试验的研究方案。
背景:空间驱避剂(SRs)已被广泛用于预防蚊虫叮咬,初步研究结果表明其对疟疾(1)和伊蚊传播的病毒(2)都有疗效,但在实际使用中,其减少蚊媒疾病的效果却从未被评估过。在传统病媒控制策略(如驱虫蚊帐和室内滞留喷洒)无法使用或使用不足的情况下,如在流离失所者或紧急救援环境中,SR 有可能成为预防蚊媒疾病的重要工具:方法:将在 3 个不同的队列中招募儿童,以确定在不同的分发渠道中,滞留喷洒在减少疟疾感染方面的有效性。其中一组将估算通过参考渠道(研究人员分发)分发的口服抗逆转录病毒药物的直接效果。其余两个队列将估算通过凭单渠道和村卫生队渠道分发的口服抗逆转录病毒药物的保护效果。每月将对组群进行两次跟踪调查(大约每 15 天一次):在当月第一次预定的家访中,将抽取血样进行疟疾快速诊断检测(月访 1);在第二次预定的家访中,只有在参与者近期有发烧史时才会抽取血样(月访 2)。将对每个队列中的疟疾发病率进行估算,并与参照队列进行比较,以确定在疟疾常年高发地区使用 SR 的益处:这项研究将填补撒哈拉以南非洲地区人道主义援助和应急响应环境中的知识空白,即在这些地区,基本传播率历来较高,驱虫蚊帐可能会也可能不会被广泛使用,在这种情况下,SR 是否能有效减少人类疟疾疾病。这项研究将为政策制定者提供信息,帮助他们决定是否推荐使用SR作为进一步减少疟疾传播的手段:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06122142。注册日期:2023 年 11 月 8 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信