Clinician Stakeholder Experience With Telemedicine Consults to Assess Neonatal Encephalopathy in a Rural State

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"Clinician Stakeholder Experience With Telemedicine Consults to Assess Neonatal Encephalopathy in a Rural State","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.07.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Serial neonatal encephalopathy (NE) examinations are difficult to perform in rural community hospitals as on-site experts are not readily available. We implemented a synchronous, acute care model of teleconsultation—the Maine Neonatal Encephalopathy Teleconsultation program (Maine NET)—to provide remote, joint assessment of NE by pediatric neurology and neonatology at nine community hospitals and one tertiary care center. We performed a qualitative study to interview clinicians about their experience of this program.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From April 2018 to October 2022, we employed a semistructured interview format with 16 clinicians representing all participating hospitals. We utilized deductive analysis to assign a set of predefined codes to the transcribed interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thematic analysis supported the anticipated benefits of Maine NET, demonstrating that clinicians felt resource utilization, collaborative decision making, communication, and continuity of care were improved. Clinicians overwhelmingly supported the program: “This program has truly saved babies' lives and future function. I have not met any parents through this journey, who aren't incredibly grateful for the care that is provided” and emphasized the benefit of collaboration between all care team members. Teleconsultation was felt to be “more than adequate to [assess] NE.” Connectivity issues were cited as a limitation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Maine NET has positively impacted care delivery for newborns with clinical concerns for NE. Additionally, the program has improved resource allocation, collaborative decision making, communication, and equity of care. Addressing technological challenges will be vital to the success and sustainability of the planned Maine NET expansion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19956,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887899424002649","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Serial neonatal encephalopathy (NE) examinations are difficult to perform in rural community hospitals as on-site experts are not readily available. We implemented a synchronous, acute care model of teleconsultation—the Maine Neonatal Encephalopathy Teleconsultation program (Maine NET)—to provide remote, joint assessment of NE by pediatric neurology and neonatology at nine community hospitals and one tertiary care center. We performed a qualitative study to interview clinicians about their experience of this program.

Methods

From April 2018 to October 2022, we employed a semistructured interview format with 16 clinicians representing all participating hospitals. We utilized deductive analysis to assign a set of predefined codes to the transcribed interviews.

Results

Thematic analysis supported the anticipated benefits of Maine NET, demonstrating that clinicians felt resource utilization, collaborative decision making, communication, and continuity of care were improved. Clinicians overwhelmingly supported the program: “This program has truly saved babies' lives and future function. I have not met any parents through this journey, who aren't incredibly grateful for the care that is provided” and emphasized the benefit of collaboration between all care team members. Teleconsultation was felt to be “more than adequate to [assess] NE.” Connectivity issues were cited as a limitation.

Conclusions

Maine NET has positively impacted care delivery for newborns with clinical concerns for NE. Additionally, the program has improved resource allocation, collaborative decision making, communication, and equity of care. Addressing technological challenges will be vital to the success and sustainability of the planned Maine NET expansion.

一个农村州的临床医生、利益相关者通过远程医疗咨询评估新生儿脑病的经验。
背景:在农村社区医院进行新生儿脑病(NE)序列检查非常困难,因为现场专家并不容易找到。我们在九家社区医院和一家三级医疗中心实施了同步急诊远程会诊模式--缅因州新生儿脑病远程会诊项目(Maine NET),由小儿神经内科和新生儿科联合对 NE 进行远程评估。我们开展了一项定性研究,采访临床医生对该计划的体验:从 2018 年 4 月到 2022 年 10 月,我们采用了半结构化访谈的形式,对代表所有参与医院的 16 名临床医生进行了访谈。我们利用演绎分析法为转录的访谈内容分配了一组预定义代码:专题分析支持缅因州 NET 的预期效益,表明临床医生认为资源利用、合作决策、沟通和护理连续性得到了改善。绝大多数临床医生都支持该计划:"这项计划确实挽救了婴儿的生命和未来的功能。在这一过程中,我没有遇到过任何一位家长不对所提供的护理感激不尽",并强调了所有护理团队成员之间合作的益处。远程会诊被认为 "足以[评估]NE"。连接问题被认为是一个限制因素:缅因州新生儿NET对新生儿NE临床问题的护理服务产生了积极影响。此外,该计划还改善了资源分配、合作决策、沟通和护理公平性。应对技术挑战对于缅因州网络扩展计划的成功和可持续性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric neurology
Pediatric neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
176
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Pediatric Neurology publishes timely peer-reviewed clinical and research articles covering all aspects of the developing nervous system. Pediatric Neurology features up-to-the-minute publication of the latest advances in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of pediatric neurologic disorders. The journal''s editor, E. Steve Roach, in conjunction with the team of Associate Editors, heads an internationally recognized editorial board, ensuring the most authoritative and extensive coverage of the field. Among the topics covered are: epilepsy, mitochondrial diseases, congenital malformations, chromosomopathies, peripheral neuropathies, perinatal and childhood stroke, cerebral palsy, as well as other diseases affecting the developing nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信