Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in paediatric idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spine fusion surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yi Ren, Jingchun Gao, Xiaolu Nie, Lei Hua, Tiehua Zheng, Dong Guo, Jianmin Zhang
{"title":"Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in paediatric idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spine fusion surgery: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yi Ren, Jingchun Gao, Xiaolu Nie, Lei Hua, Tiehua Zheng, Dong Guo, Jianmin Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08457-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Major spinal surgery causes severe pain. We examined the ability of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) to alleviate pain after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in paediatric scoliosis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-two patients who underwent PSF were randomized into a preoperative ultrasound-guided ESPB group or a no-block control group. The composite primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) of the numerical rating scale (NRS) score in the first 24 h after surgery and the number of parent-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) boluses administered 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes included the NRS score, opioid consumption, rescue analgesia, adverse events, and quality of recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AUC-NRS at rest was 62 (13) in the ESPB group and 89 (13) in the control group (P < 0.001). There were 15 (5) 24-h PCIA boluses administered in the ESPB group and 30 (7) in the control group (P < 0.001). Compared with those in the control group, the NRS scores at rest were lower in the ESPB group at 0, 3, 6, and 9 h postoperatively, and the NRS scores during movement were lower in the ESPB group at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 h postoperatively. The ESPB group showed a lower need for PCIA than did the control group at 0-6, 6-12, 12-18 and 1-24 h postoperatively. In the ESPB group, fewer patients required rescue analgesics, and patients exhibited a higher quality of recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative ESPB improves postoperative analgesia in paediatric scoliosis patients who underwent PSF.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ChiCTR2300074505.</p><p><strong>Date of registration: </strong>August 8, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08457-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Major spinal surgery causes severe pain. We examined the ability of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) to alleviate pain after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in paediatric scoliosis patients.

Methods: Seventy-two patients who underwent PSF were randomized into a preoperative ultrasound-guided ESPB group or a no-block control group. The composite primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) of the numerical rating scale (NRS) score in the first 24 h after surgery and the number of parent-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) boluses administered 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes included the NRS score, opioid consumption, rescue analgesia, adverse events, and quality of recovery.

Results: The AUC-NRS at rest was 62 (13) in the ESPB group and 89 (13) in the control group (P < 0.001). There were 15 (5) 24-h PCIA boluses administered in the ESPB group and 30 (7) in the control group (P < 0.001). Compared with those in the control group, the NRS scores at rest were lower in the ESPB group at 0, 3, 6, and 9 h postoperatively, and the NRS scores during movement were lower in the ESPB group at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 h postoperatively. The ESPB group showed a lower need for PCIA than did the control group at 0-6, 6-12, 12-18 and 1-24 h postoperatively. In the ESPB group, fewer patients required rescue analgesics, and patients exhibited a higher quality of recovery.

Conclusion: Preoperative ESPB improves postoperative analgesia in paediatric scoliosis patients who underwent PSF.

Trial registration number: ChiCTR2300074505.

Date of registration: August 8, 2023.

Abstract Image

双侧超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞用于接受脊柱后路融合手术的小儿特发性脊柱侧凸患者的术后镇痛:随机对照试验。
目的:大型脊柱手术会引起剧烈疼痛。我们研究了竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)缓解脊柱后路融合术(PSF)后儿童脊柱侧凸患者疼痛的能力:72名脊柱后凸融合术患者被随机分为术前超声引导下的ESPB组和无阻滞对照组。综合主要结果是术后 24 小时内数字评分量表(NRS)评分的曲线下面积(AUC)和术后 24 小时内家长控制静脉镇痛(PCIA)用药次数。次要结果包括NRS评分、阿片类药物用量、镇痛抢救、不良事件和恢复质量:结果:ESPB 组静息时的 AUC-NRS 为 62(13)分,对照组为 89(13)分(P 结论:ESPB 可改善术前镇痛效果:术前ESPB可改善接受PSF的小儿脊柱侧弯患者的术后镇痛效果:ChiCTR2300074505.注册日期:2023年8月8日:注册日期:2023年8月8日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信