Low-velocity impact response of hybrid core sandwich panels with spring and strut cores filled with resin, silicone, and foam

IF 3.4 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Assil Charkaoui, Noha M. Hassan, Zied Bahroun, Mahmoud Ibrahim
{"title":"Low-velocity impact response of hybrid core sandwich panels with spring and strut cores filled with resin, silicone, and foam","authors":"Assil Charkaoui,&nbsp;Noha M. Hassan,&nbsp;Zied Bahroun,&nbsp;Mahmoud Ibrahim","doi":"10.1186/s40712-024-00158-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Advancements in the load-bearing capacity of composite panels open doors to high-performance applications. The integration of additive manufacturing allows for the creation of intricate core designs effortlessly. Hybrid cores, combining structural elements with infill materials, play a crucial role in enhancing panel impact resistance while maintaining its low weight. This study compares sandwich panels incorporating spring and octet strut structural elements infused with different materials—silicon, foam, and epoxy resin—evaluating their energy absorption capabilities. Additive manufacturing is employed to produce these panels with structural elements then subsequently filled with infills. The drop tower test is utilized to experimentally assess panel behavior under low-velocity impact. Design of experiments and statistical analysis are used to examine the influence of core height, impact height, core geometry, and filling type on the damaged area and impactor penetration. Results showed that the strut-based structure performed better than other structures in preventing penetration, with a damaged area reduction from 501.45 to 301.58 m<sup>2</sup> compared to the spring core. The addition of foam or silicon reduced the impact damage to the front and the back sheets, with silicon infills proving to be the most effective, reducing penetration by reducing penetration by about 60%. The depth of impact was measured, with results indicating that the truss core displayed the smallest specific depth of penetration. A decision tree model predicted that a sandwich panel with a spring core would have a 100% chance of perforation while a filled core showed a significantly reduced penetration risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":592,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://jmsg.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s40712-024-00158-8","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40712-024-00158-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advancements in the load-bearing capacity of composite panels open doors to high-performance applications. The integration of additive manufacturing allows for the creation of intricate core designs effortlessly. Hybrid cores, combining structural elements with infill materials, play a crucial role in enhancing panel impact resistance while maintaining its low weight. This study compares sandwich panels incorporating spring and octet strut structural elements infused with different materials—silicon, foam, and epoxy resin—evaluating their energy absorption capabilities. Additive manufacturing is employed to produce these panels with structural elements then subsequently filled with infills. The drop tower test is utilized to experimentally assess panel behavior under low-velocity impact. Design of experiments and statistical analysis are used to examine the influence of core height, impact height, core geometry, and filling type on the damaged area and impactor penetration. Results showed that the strut-based structure performed better than other structures in preventing penetration, with a damaged area reduction from 501.45 to 301.58 m2 compared to the spring core. The addition of foam or silicon reduced the impact damage to the front and the back sheets, with silicon infills proving to be the most effective, reducing penetration by reducing penetration by about 60%. The depth of impact was measured, with results indicating that the truss core displayed the smallest specific depth of penetration. A decision tree model predicted that a sandwich panel with a spring core would have a 100% chance of perforation while a filled core showed a significantly reduced penetration risk.

混合芯材夹芯板的低速冲击响应,其弹簧和支柱芯材中填充了树脂、硅酮和泡沫塑料
复合板承重能力的提高为高性能应用打开了大门。增材制造技术的集成可以毫不费力地创造出复杂的芯材设计。混合芯材将结构元素与填充材料相结合,在增强板材抗冲击能力的同时保持低重量方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究比较了采用不同材料(硅、泡沫和环氧树脂)填充弹簧和八字形支柱结构件的夹芯板,评估了它们的能量吸收能力。该研究采用快速成型技术生产这些带有结构元件的面板,然后再填充填充物。利用落塔试验对面板在低速冲击下的行为进行实验评估。实验设计和统计分析用于研究芯材高度、撞击高度、芯材几何形状和填充类型对受损面积和撞击器穿透力的影响。结果表明,基于支柱的结构在防止穿透方面的表现优于其他结构,与弹簧芯材相比,受损面积从 501.45 平方米减少到 301.58 平方米。添加泡沫或硅减少了对前板和后板的撞击破坏,其中硅填充被证明是最有效的,可减少约 60% 的穿透力。对冲击深度进行了测量,结果表明桁架芯材的穿透深度最小。根据决策树模型预测,带有弹簧芯材的夹芯板穿孔几率为 100%,而填充芯材的穿孔风险则大大降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信