“A thought group is a group, not a thought!” results of a teaching intervention on complex noun phrases in Canadian EAP programs

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Dmitri Priven , Guillaume Gentil , Geoffrey G. Pinchbeck , Brian Strong
{"title":"“A thought group is a group, not a thought!” results of a teaching intervention on complex noun phrases in Canadian EAP programs","authors":"Dmitri Priven ,&nbsp;Guillaume Gentil ,&nbsp;Geoffrey G. Pinchbeck ,&nbsp;Brian Strong","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Complex noun phrases (CNPs) are a major vehicle of academic written discourse. However, despite posing significant challenges to English language learners (ELLs), they are rarely taught in post-secondary English for Academic Purposes (EAP) programs. This article reports on a quasi-experimental study on the usefulness of explicit teaching of the structure and use of CNPs in Canadian post-secondary EAP programs for the purposes of reading comprehension. Specially designed modules on CNP structure and use were integrated into advanced reading and writing EAP courses taught to 96 first-year college and university ELLs over the course of a semester. 102 ELLs in different sections of the same courses had regular instruction without the CNP modules. Pre- and post-test scores were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), and the teaching intervention was found to have a significant effect on the post-test scores in the experimental group. The relative success of the intervention is analyzed in relation to the literature on form-focused teaching interventions in reading courses. The article concludes by discussing opportunities for further integration of CNP instruction in EAP curricula.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 103450"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X2400232X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Complex noun phrases (CNPs) are a major vehicle of academic written discourse. However, despite posing significant challenges to English language learners (ELLs), they are rarely taught in post-secondary English for Academic Purposes (EAP) programs. This article reports on a quasi-experimental study on the usefulness of explicit teaching of the structure and use of CNPs in Canadian post-secondary EAP programs for the purposes of reading comprehension. Specially designed modules on CNP structure and use were integrated into advanced reading and writing EAP courses taught to 96 first-year college and university ELLs over the course of a semester. 102 ELLs in different sections of the same courses had regular instruction without the CNP modules. Pre- and post-test scores were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), and the teaching intervention was found to have a significant effect on the post-test scores in the experimental group. The relative success of the intervention is analyzed in relation to the literature on form-focused teaching interventions in reading courses. The article concludes by discussing opportunities for further integration of CNP instruction in EAP curricula.

"思想群是一个群,而不是一个思想!"加拿大 EAP 课程中关于复杂名词短语的教学干预结果
复杂名词短语(CNPs)是学术书面语的主要载体。然而,尽管复杂名词短语对英语学习者(ELLs)提出了巨大挑战,但中学后学术英语(EAP)课程却很少教授复杂名词短语。本文报告了一项准实验研究,该研究探讨了在加拿大中学后EAP课程中,以阅读理解为目的,明确教授CNP的结构和使用是否有用。在一个学期的时间里,为 96 名大学一年级英语语言学习者开设的高级阅读和写作 EAP 课程中纳入了专门设计的 CNP 结构和使用模块。同一课程不同部分的 102 名英语语言学习者在没有 CNP 模块的情况下接受常规教学。使用广义线性混合模型(GLMM)分析了前测和后测成绩,发现教学干预对实验组的后测成绩有显著影响。文章结合有关阅读课程中以形式为重点的教学干预的文献,分析了干预的相对成功之处。文章最后讨论了在 EAP 课程中进一步整合 CNP 教学的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信