The impact of green innovations on firm’s sustainable operations: Process innovation and recycling innovation

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
{"title":"The impact of green innovations on firm’s sustainable operations: Process innovation and recycling innovation","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As the urgency and importance of global carbon emission reduction have escalated in recent years, numerous firms are considering ideas to develop innovative green technologies in order to contribute to the low-carbon economy. This paper examines two types of green innovations adopted by firms, namely process innovation (improving production processes to enhance energy efficiency) and recycling innovation (establishing a circular economy to recycle and re-manufacture waste products). By developing a game-theoretical model, our analytical results reveal the following findings. First, we find that both process and recycling innovations can attract more consumers and improve the firm’s profitability under specific conditions. Second, when the cost advantage of remanufacturing is sufficiently low, the adoption of process innovation is always more profitable than recycling innovation. Otherwise, the profitability largely depends on the trade-off between consumers’ perception of the two green innovations. Third, compared to a single innovation, the adoption of both process and recycling innovations (dual green innovation) leads to a further increase in consumer demand and firm’s profit when the cost advantage of remanufacturing exceeds a certain threshold. Furthermore, the optimal pricing set by the firm and consumer demand become more sensitive to consumers’ perception of greenness when dual green innovation is adopted. Finally, the equilibrium result suggests the existence of a “synergistic promoting effect” when the firm implements dual green innovation, which indicates that the advantages of each innovation are amplified when the firm adopts dual green innovation. These results can serve as guidelines for firms aiming to utilize green innovations in order to reduce carbon emissions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030504832400135X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the urgency and importance of global carbon emission reduction have escalated in recent years, numerous firms are considering ideas to develop innovative green technologies in order to contribute to the low-carbon economy. This paper examines two types of green innovations adopted by firms, namely process innovation (improving production processes to enhance energy efficiency) and recycling innovation (establishing a circular economy to recycle and re-manufacture waste products). By developing a game-theoretical model, our analytical results reveal the following findings. First, we find that both process and recycling innovations can attract more consumers and improve the firm’s profitability under specific conditions. Second, when the cost advantage of remanufacturing is sufficiently low, the adoption of process innovation is always more profitable than recycling innovation. Otherwise, the profitability largely depends on the trade-off between consumers’ perception of the two green innovations. Third, compared to a single innovation, the adoption of both process and recycling innovations (dual green innovation) leads to a further increase in consumer demand and firm’s profit when the cost advantage of remanufacturing exceeds a certain threshold. Furthermore, the optimal pricing set by the firm and consumer demand become more sensitive to consumers’ perception of greenness when dual green innovation is adopted. Finally, the equilibrium result suggests the existence of a “synergistic promoting effect” when the firm implements dual green innovation, which indicates that the advantages of each innovation are amplified when the firm adopts dual green innovation. These results can serve as guidelines for firms aiming to utilize green innovations in order to reduce carbon emissions.

绿色创新对企业可持续运营的影响:工艺创新和回收创新
近年来,随着全球碳减排的紧迫性和重要性不断提升,许多企业都在考虑开发创新型绿色技术,以促进低碳经济的发展。本文研究了企业采用的两类绿色创新,即工艺创新(改进生产工艺以提高能源效率)和回收创新(建立循环经济以回收和再制造废品)。通过建立博弈理论模型,我们的分析结果揭示了以下结论。首先,我们发现在特定条件下,工艺创新和回收创新都能吸引更多消费者,提高企业的盈利能力。其次,当再制造的成本优势足够低时,采用工艺创新总是比回收创新更有利可图。否则,盈利能力在很大程度上取决于消费者对两种绿色创新的看法之间的权衡。第三,与单一创新相比,当再制造的成本优势超过一定临界值时,同时采用工艺创新和回收创新(双重绿色创新)会进一步增加消费者需求和企业利润。此外,当采用双重绿色创新时,企业设定的最优定价和消费者需求对消费者的绿色感知更加敏感。最后,均衡结果表明,当企业实施双重绿色创新时,存在 "协同促进效应",这表明当企业采用双重绿色创新时,每种创新的优势都会被放大。这些结果可以为旨在利用绿色创新减少碳排放的企业提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信