Establishing an accountability benchmark for equity, diversity, and inclusion: A 10-year scoping review of Families, Systems, & Health.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Brittany H Eghaneyan, Katherine Sanchez, Cante Nakanishi, Tai J Mendenhall
{"title":"Establishing an accountability benchmark for equity, diversity, and inclusion: A 10-year scoping review of Families, Systems, & Health.","authors":"Brittany H Eghaneyan, Katherine Sanchez, Cante Nakanishi, Tai J Mendenhall","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2022, <i>Families, Systems, & Health</i> (FSH) issued a statement of purpose to equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) and developed a strategic plan for promoting EDI in scientific communication and publishing. The purpose of this review was to evaluate a decade of research published in FSH prior to the journal's initiatives to improve EDI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We utilized a scoping review to broadly review literature published in FSH that focused on topics of race, ethnicity, racism, and/or BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and people of color) groups. All research studies published in FSH between 2012 and 2021 were independently assessed by two reviewers for inclusion. Charting of data from each study was based on a diversity accountability index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 360 research studies identified, 41 were included in the review. Characteristics and frequencies of keywords, research designs, and samples among the included studies were examined, alongside the reporting of results that focused on the differences between racial/ethnic groups and within BIPOC groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Research focused on race, ethnicity, racism, and diversity science is not well represented among published studies in FSH prior to the implementation of the above-described EDI efforts. Among articles that did focus on these topics, comparisons largely were of a racial/ethnic minority sample to a White sample. Action steps for FSH and other journals wishing to promote EDI include a thorough examination of current journal review procedures paired with the establishment of procedures for combatting bias and racism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000922","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In 2022, Families, Systems, & Health (FSH) issued a statement of purpose to equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) and developed a strategic plan for promoting EDI in scientific communication and publishing. The purpose of this review was to evaluate a decade of research published in FSH prior to the journal's initiatives to improve EDI.

Method: We utilized a scoping review to broadly review literature published in FSH that focused on topics of race, ethnicity, racism, and/or BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and people of color) groups. All research studies published in FSH between 2012 and 2021 were independently assessed by two reviewers for inclusion. Charting of data from each study was based on a diversity accountability index.

Results: Of the 360 research studies identified, 41 were included in the review. Characteristics and frequencies of keywords, research designs, and samples among the included studies were examined, alongside the reporting of results that focused on the differences between racial/ethnic groups and within BIPOC groups.

Discussion: Research focused on race, ethnicity, racism, and diversity science is not well represented among published studies in FSH prior to the implementation of the above-described EDI efforts. Among articles that did focus on these topics, comparisons largely were of a racial/ethnic minority sample to a White sample. Action steps for FSH and other journals wishing to promote EDI include a thorough examination of current journal review procedures paired with the establishment of procedures for combatting bias and racism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

建立公平、多样性和包容性的问责基准:家庭、系统与健康》十年范围审查。
导言:2022 年,《家庭、系统与健康》(Families, Systems, & Health, FSH)发表了一份关于公平、多样性与包容性(EDI)的宗旨声明,并制定了在科学交流与出版中促进 EDI 的战略计划。本综述旨在评估在《家庭、系统与健康》杂志采取改善 EDI 的举措之前,该杂志发表的十年研究成果:方法:我们采用了范围界定审查的方法,广泛审查了发表在《科学新闻》上的以种族、民族、种族主义和/或 BIPOC(黑人、土著人和有色人种)群体为主题的文献。2012 年至 2021 年间在《家庭健康》上发表的所有研究报告均由两名审稿人进行独立评估,以决定是否纳入。每项研究的数据图表均基于多样性责任指数:在确定的 360 项研究中,有 41 项被纳入审查范围。对所纳入研究的关键词、研究设计和样本的特征和频率进行了审查,同时还对结果报告进行了审查,重点关注种族/民族群体之间以及 BIPOC 群体内部的差异:讨论:在实施上述电子数据交换工作之前,以种族、民族、种族主义和多样性科学为重点的研究在已发表的家庭健康研究中并不多见。在关注这些主题的文章中,主要是将少数种族/族裔样本与白人样本进行比较。FSH和其他希望促进EDI的期刊的行动步骤包括彻底检查当前的期刊审查程序,同时建立打击偏见和种族主义的程序。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信