Discharge disposition for home health care patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia: The role of living arrangements and rural living.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Daniel Jung, Jeong Ha Steph Choi, Kerstin Gerst Emerson
{"title":"Discharge disposition for home health care patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia: The role of living arrangements and rural living.","authors":"Daniel Jung, Jeong Ha Steph Choi, Kerstin Gerst Emerson","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the relationship between living arrangements and discharge disposition, and how this relationship differs by the rural or urban characteristics of the patient's residence among home health care patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used the 2019 Outcome and Assessment Information Set and the Master Beneficiary Summary File. Our study was based on 531,269 Medicare fee-for-service patients with ADRD. We used linear probability regression models to examine the relationship between discharge disposition (to the community vs. an institution) and living arrangements, including an interaction term for rural-urban residence.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Patients in rural areas (19.8%) were more likely to live alone than those in urban areas (15.2%). Our main results show that patients living at home with others (coefficient: -0.02, p-value < 0.001) or alone (coefficient: -0.03, p-value < 0.001) were less likely to be discharged to the community compared to patients who lived in congregate settings. Also, for patients with ADRD who lived in rural areas, living at home with others (rural*home with others; coefficient: -0.02, p-value < 0.001) or living alone (rural*home alone; coefficient: -0.03, p-value<0.001) were associated with additional lower probabilities of being discharged to their communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A multidimensional approach considering living arrangements to support home health care patients with ADRD could be critical to achieving better health outcomes. Furthermore, implementing area-specific target interventions could be important for improving the care and health of patients with ADRD as well as reducing rural-urban disparities in discharge disposition.</p>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12872","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the relationship between living arrangements and discharge disposition, and how this relationship differs by the rural or urban characteristics of the patient's residence among home health care patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD).

Methods: This retrospective study used the 2019 Outcome and Assessment Information Set and the Master Beneficiary Summary File. Our study was based on 531,269 Medicare fee-for-service patients with ADRD. We used linear probability regression models to examine the relationship between discharge disposition (to the community vs. an institution) and living arrangements, including an interaction term for rural-urban residence.

Findings: Patients in rural areas (19.8%) were more likely to live alone than those in urban areas (15.2%). Our main results show that patients living at home with others (coefficient: -0.02, p-value < 0.001) or alone (coefficient: -0.03, p-value < 0.001) were less likely to be discharged to the community compared to patients who lived in congregate settings. Also, for patients with ADRD who lived in rural areas, living at home with others (rural*home with others; coefficient: -0.02, p-value < 0.001) or living alone (rural*home alone; coefficient: -0.03, p-value<0.001) were associated with additional lower probabilities of being discharged to their communities.

Conclusions: A multidimensional approach considering living arrangements to support home health care patients with ADRD could be critical to achieving better health outcomes. Furthermore, implementing area-specific target interventions could be important for improving the care and health of patients with ADRD as well as reducing rural-urban disparities in discharge disposition.

患有阿尔茨海默氏症和相关痴呆症的家庭保健患者的出院处置:生活安排和农村生活的作用。
目的:研究阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(ADRD)居家医疗患者的生活安排与出院处置之间的关系,以及这种关系因患者居住地的农村或城市特征而有何不同:这项回顾性研究使用了 2019 年结果和评估信息集以及主受益人汇总档案。我们的研究基于 531,269 名患有 ADRD 的联邦医疗保险付费服务患者。我们使用线性概率回归模型来研究出院处置(社区与机构)和生活安排之间的关系,包括城乡居住地的交互项:研究结果:农村地区的患者(19.8%)比城市地区的患者(15.2%)更有可能独居。我们的主要结果表明,与他人同住(系数:-0.02,P值<0.001)或独居(系数:-0.03,P值<0.001)的患者与居住在集中环境中的患者相比,出院到社区的可能性更小。此外,对于居住在农村地区的 ADRD 患者来说,与他人同住(农村*与他人同住;系数:-0.02,P 值<0.001)或独居(农村*独居;系数:-0.03,P 值结论:考虑到生活安排的多维方法对于支持患有 ADRD 的居家医疗患者取得更好的健康结果至关重要。此外,实施针对特定地区的目标干预措施对于改善 ADRD 患者的护理和健康状况以及减少出院处置方面的城乡差异也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信