Injury of the superficial femoral artery and posterior tibial artery associated with an atherectomy device.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1177/17085381241276608
Ahmed M Afifi, Samuel C Dunseith, Munier Nazzal
{"title":"Injury of the superficial femoral artery and posterior tibial artery associated with an atherectomy device.","authors":"Ahmed M Afifi, Samuel C Dunseith, Munier Nazzal","doi":"10.1177/17085381241276608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Rotational atherectomy can offer a viable treatment for occlusive peripheral artery disease; maintaining the minimal invasiveness of an endovascular procedure, while allowing for a more complete lesion debridement compared with balloon angioplasty. This case report outlines a complication of guidewire entrapment associated with rotational atherectomy in the superficial femoral artery (SFA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 57-year-old male underwent an atherectomy with Rotorex for left lower limb foot pain. During the procedure, the guidewire was suctioned into the atherectomy device, preventing any further advancement of the device and damaging the SFA and posterior tibial artery (PTA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The atherectomy device was withdrawn and a new vascular access site was gained in the left PTA. A covered stent was inserted to treat the original SFA lesion, and balloon angioplasty was used to repair the device-induced damaged to the PTA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While guidewire complications have been previously reported, this case report details the first reported case, to our knowledge, of guidewire entrapment while using a rotational atherectomy device. Knowledge of this possible complication of rotational atherectomy can aid in clinical decision making when choosing between treatments for peripheral vascular disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"17085381241276608"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241276608","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Rotational atherectomy can offer a viable treatment for occlusive peripheral artery disease; maintaining the minimal invasiveness of an endovascular procedure, while allowing for a more complete lesion debridement compared with balloon angioplasty. This case report outlines a complication of guidewire entrapment associated with rotational atherectomy in the superficial femoral artery (SFA).

Methods: A 57-year-old male underwent an atherectomy with Rotorex for left lower limb foot pain. During the procedure, the guidewire was suctioned into the atherectomy device, preventing any further advancement of the device and damaging the SFA and posterior tibial artery (PTA).

Results: The atherectomy device was withdrawn and a new vascular access site was gained in the left PTA. A covered stent was inserted to treat the original SFA lesion, and balloon angioplasty was used to repair the device-induced damaged to the PTA.

Conclusion: While guidewire complications have been previously reported, this case report details the first reported case, to our knowledge, of guidewire entrapment while using a rotational atherectomy device. Knowledge of this possible complication of rotational atherectomy can aid in clinical decision making when choosing between treatments for peripheral vascular disease.

股浅动脉和胫后动脉损伤与动脉粥样硬化切除装置有关。
目的:旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术是治疗闭塞性外周动脉疾病的一种可行方法;它既能保持血管内手术的微创性,又能比球囊血管成形术更彻底地清除病灶。本病例报告概述了与股浅动脉(SFA)旋转式动脉粥样硬化切除术相关的导丝夹持并发症:一名 57 岁的男性因左下肢足部疼痛接受了 Rotorex 椎体切除术。在手术过程中,导丝被吸入动脉粥样硬化切除装置,阻止了该装置的进一步推进,并损伤了股浅动脉和胫后动脉(PTA):结果:动脉粥样硬化切除装置被撤回,并在左侧 PTA 获得了一个新的血管通路。结论:虽然导丝并发症在临床上时有发生,但患者并没有因此而放弃治疗:据我们所知,本病例报告详细介绍了第一例使用旋转式动脉粥样硬化切除术设备时发生的导丝卡住并发症。了解旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术可能出现的并发症有助于临床在选择外周血管疾病治疗方法时做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信