Is Next-day Discharge Safe After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Andrew M Kirk, Alyssa M Barré, Vincent W Prusick, Caitlin Conley, Ryan D Muchow
{"title":"Is Next-day Discharge Safe After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?","authors":"Andrew M Kirk, Alyssa M Barré, Vincent W Prusick, Caitlin Conley, Ryan D Muchow","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and improvements in pain control have decreased the length of stay (LOS) after scoliosis surgery, adolescents are typically hospitalized for several days after posterior spinal instrumented fusion (PSF). The purpose of this study was to determine whether next-day discharge after PSF for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) had an equivalent safety profile compared with longer LOS. The secondary purpose was to examine perioperative factors associated with next-day discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of all patients who underwent PSF for AIS at a single institution from 2017 to 2022. We compared patients based on postoperative LOS with an early discharge group consisting of those who were discharged on the first postoperative day 1 (POD1; n = 40) and a standard discharge group consisting of those who were discharged after POD1 (n = 71). We documented preoperative variables, including patient demographics and curve characteristics, intraoperative variables, including levels fused, implant density, operative time, and blood loss, and postoperative variables, including emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days and hospital readmissions within 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred eleven patients were included with a mean curve magnitude of 67 degrees. Forty patients (36%) were discharged on POD1. There were one (3%) ED visit and 2 (5%) readmissions in the early discharge group and 3 (4%) ED visits and 2 (3%) readmissions in the standard discharge group (P = 0.64 and 0.55, respectively). Patients in whom intravenous methadone was used intraoperatively were more likely to discharge POD1 (P = 0.02). There were no other significant differences in perioperative variables between the two groups including: BMI, distance from home to hospital, magnitude of main curve, curve flexibility, number of levels fused, estimated blood loss, implant density, operative time, or postoperative pain scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Next-day discharge after PSF for AIS has an equivalent safety profile compared with longer LOS. Over one-third of patients were discharged on POD1, and there was no statistically significant difference in ED visits or hospital readmissions between the groups. Patients in whom intravenous methadone was used intraoperatively were more likely to discharge POD1.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>In a retrospective study of posterior spinal fusions for AIS, we found no increase in ED visits or hospital readmissions for those discharged the next day.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002792","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: While the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and improvements in pain control have decreased the length of stay (LOS) after scoliosis surgery, adolescents are typically hospitalized for several days after posterior spinal instrumented fusion (PSF). The purpose of this study was to determine whether next-day discharge after PSF for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) had an equivalent safety profile compared with longer LOS. The secondary purpose was to examine perioperative factors associated with next-day discharge.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of all patients who underwent PSF for AIS at a single institution from 2017 to 2022. We compared patients based on postoperative LOS with an early discharge group consisting of those who were discharged on the first postoperative day 1 (POD1; n = 40) and a standard discharge group consisting of those who were discharged after POD1 (n = 71). We documented preoperative variables, including patient demographics and curve characteristics, intraoperative variables, including levels fused, implant density, operative time, and blood loss, and postoperative variables, including emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days and hospital readmissions within 90 days.

Results: One hundred eleven patients were included with a mean curve magnitude of 67 degrees. Forty patients (36%) were discharged on POD1. There were one (3%) ED visit and 2 (5%) readmissions in the early discharge group and 3 (4%) ED visits and 2 (3%) readmissions in the standard discharge group (P = 0.64 and 0.55, respectively). Patients in whom intravenous methadone was used intraoperatively were more likely to discharge POD1 (P = 0.02). There were no other significant differences in perioperative variables between the two groups including: BMI, distance from home to hospital, magnitude of main curve, curve flexibility, number of levels fused, estimated blood loss, implant density, operative time, or postoperative pain scores.

Conclusions: Next-day discharge after PSF for AIS has an equivalent safety profile compared with longer LOS. Over one-third of patients were discharged on POD1, and there was no statistically significant difference in ED visits or hospital readmissions between the groups. Patients in whom intravenous methadone was used intraoperatively were more likely to discharge POD1.

Clinical relevance: In a retrospective study of posterior spinal fusions for AIS, we found no increase in ED visits or hospital readmissions for those discharged the next day.

Level of evidence: Level III.

青少年特发性脊柱侧凸后路脊柱融合术后第二天出院安全吗?
目的:虽然加强术后恢复方案的实施和疼痛控制的改善缩短了脊柱侧弯手术后的住院时间(LOS),但青少年在脊柱后路器械融合术(PSF)后通常要住院数天。本研究的目的是确定青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)后路器械融合术后次日出院是否与较长的住院时间具有同等的安全性。次要目的是研究与次日出院相关的围手术期因素:我们对 2017 年至 2022 年在一家机构接受 PSF 治疗的所有 AIS 患者进行了回顾性研究。我们根据术后 LOS 对患者进行了比较,早期出院组包括术后第 1 天(POD1;n = 40)出院的患者,标准出院组包括 POD1 后出院的患者(n = 71)。我们记录了术前变量(包括患者人口统计学和曲线特征)、术中变量(包括融合水平、植入物密度、手术时间和失血量)和术后变量(包括30天内急诊就诊和90天内再次入院):共纳入 111 名患者,平均曲线幅度为 67 度。40名患者(36%)在POD1出院。提前出院组有 1 次(3%)急诊就诊和 2 次(5%)再入院,标准出院组有 3 次(4%)急诊就诊和 2 次(3%)再入院(P = 0.64 和 0.55)。术中静脉注射美沙酮的患者更有可能在 POD1 出院(P = 0.02)。两组患者在围手术期的其他变量(包括体重指数、从家到医院的距离)方面没有明显差异:两组患者的体重指数、从家到医院的距离、主曲线的幅度、曲线的柔韧性、融合的层次数、估计失血量、植入物密度、手术时间或术后疼痛评分等围术期变量均无明显差异:结论:与较长的住院时间相比,AIS PSF术后次日出院具有同等的安全性。超过三分之一的患者在 POD1 当天出院,两组患者的急诊就诊率或再入院率没有明显的统计学差异。术中静脉注射美沙酮的患者更有可能在 POD1 出院:临床相关性:在一项关于后路脊柱融合术治疗AIS的回顾性研究中,我们发现第二天出院的患者的急诊就诊率或再入院率没有增加:证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信