Depth of response and treatment outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and high PD-L1 expression: An exploratory analysis of retrospective multicenter cohort.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Yusuke Tachibana, Kenji Morimoto, Tadaaki Yamada, Hayato Kawachi, Motohiro Tamiya, Yoshiki Negi, Yasuhiro Goto, Akira Nakao, Shinsuke Shiotsu, Keiko Tanimura, Takayuki Takeda, Asuka Okada, Taishi Harada, Koji Date, Yusuke Chihara, Isao Hasegawa, Nobuyo Tamiya, Yuki Katayama, Naoya Nishioka, Masahiro Iwasaku, Shinsaku Tokuda, Takashi Kijima, Koichi Takayama
{"title":"Depth of response and treatment outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and high PD-L1 expression: An exploratory analysis of retrospective multicenter cohort.","authors":"Yusuke Tachibana, Kenji Morimoto, Tadaaki Yamada, Hayato Kawachi, Motohiro Tamiya, Yoshiki Negi, Yasuhiro Goto, Akira Nakao, Shinsuke Shiotsu, Keiko Tanimura, Takayuki Takeda, Asuka Okada, Taishi Harada, Koji Date, Yusuke Chihara, Isao Hasegawa, Nobuyo Tamiya, Yuki Katayama, Naoya Nishioka, Masahiro Iwasaku, Shinsaku Tokuda, Takashi Kijima, Koichi Takayama","doi":"10.1007/s10637-024-01467-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The association between depth of response (DpR) and treatment outcomes has been documented across various types of cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment is globally used as first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50%. However, in this population, the significance of DpR is not elucidated. Patients with advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% who received ICI-monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled into this study. Treatment responses were grouped into DpR 'quartiles' by percentage of maximal tumor reduction (Q1 = 1-25%, Q2 = 26-50%, Q3 = 51-75%, and Q4 =  ≥ 76%), and no tumor reduction (NTR). The association between DpR and survival rates were determined using hazard ratios (HR) generated by the Cox proportional hazards model. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine survival outcomes. A total of 349 patients were included, of which 214 and 135 patients received pembrolizumab monotherapy and ICI plus chemotherapy, respectively, as first-line treatments. The majority of the patients were male. All DpR quartiles, especially Q4, showed an association with progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS). In the Q4 cohort, patients who received pembrolizumab had a longer PFS than those who received ICI plus chemotherapy. High DpR was associated with longer PFS and OS, with a more pronounced effect observed with pembrolizumab monotherapy than with ICI plus chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14513,"journal":{"name":"Investigational New Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigational New Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-024-01467-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The association between depth of response (DpR) and treatment outcomes has been documented across various types of cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment is globally used as first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50%. However, in this population, the significance of DpR is not elucidated. Patients with advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% who received ICI-monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled into this study. Treatment responses were grouped into DpR 'quartiles' by percentage of maximal tumor reduction (Q1 = 1-25%, Q2 = 26-50%, Q3 = 51-75%, and Q4 =  ≥ 76%), and no tumor reduction (NTR). The association between DpR and survival rates were determined using hazard ratios (HR) generated by the Cox proportional hazards model. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine survival outcomes. A total of 349 patients were included, of which 214 and 135 patients received pembrolizumab monotherapy and ICI plus chemotherapy, respectively, as first-line treatments. The majority of the patients were male. All DpR quartiles, especially Q4, showed an association with progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS). In the Q4 cohort, patients who received pembrolizumab had a longer PFS than those who received ICI plus chemotherapy. High DpR was associated with longer PFS and OS, with a more pronounced effect observed with pembrolizumab monotherapy than with ICI plus chemotherapy.

Abstract Image

以免疫检查点抑制剂为基础的疗法对PD-L1高表达的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的反应深度和治疗效果:回顾性多中心队列的探索性分析。
各种类型癌症的反应深度(DpR)与治疗效果之间的关系均有文献记载。基于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的治疗在全球被用作程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达≥50%的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一线治疗。然而,在这一人群中,DpR的重要性尚未得到阐明。本研究回顾性纳入了接受 ICI 单药治疗或 ICI 加化疗的 PD-L1 表达≥50%的晚期 NSCLC 患者。治疗反应按最大肿瘤缩小百分比分为DpR "四分位"(Q1 = 1-25%、Q2 = 26-50%、Q3 = 51-75%、Q4 = ≥ 76%)和无肿瘤缩小(NTR)。DpR 与生存率之间的关系通过 Cox 比例危险模型产生的危险比(HR)来确定。Kaplan-Meier 法用于确定生存结果。共纳入了349名患者,其中214名和135名患者分别接受了pembrolizumab单药治疗和ICI加化疗作为一线治疗。大部分患者为男性。所有DpR四分位数,尤其是Q4,都与无进展生存期(PFS)/总生存期(OS)相关。在 Q4 组群中,接受 pembrolizumab 治疗的患者比接受 ICI 加化疗的患者的无进展生存期更长。高DpR与更长的PFS和OS有关,与ICI联合化疗相比,pembrolizumab单药的效果更明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The development of new anticancer agents is one of the most rapidly changing aspects of cancer research. Investigational New Drugs provides a forum for the rapid dissemination of information on new anticancer agents. The papers published are of interest to the medical chemist, toxicologist, pharmacist, pharmacologist, biostatistician and clinical oncologist. Investigational New Drugs provides the fastest possible publication of new discoveries and results for the whole community of scientists developing anticancer agents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信