Substrate Characterization and Outcomes of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: A Multicenter Study.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Paolo Compagnucci, Antonio Dello Russo, Alessio Gasperetti, Marco Schiavone, Ojasav Sehrawat, Kanae Hasegawa, Sanghamitra Mohanty, Jackson J Liang, Suraj Kapa, Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia, Frank Bogun, William G Stevenson, Claudio Tondo, Konstantinos C Siontis, Harikrishna Tandri, Pasquale Santangeli, Andrea Natale, Michela Casella
{"title":"Substrate Characterization and Outcomes of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Paolo Compagnucci, Antonio Dello Russo, Alessio Gasperetti, Marco Schiavone, Ojasav Sehrawat, Kanae Hasegawa, Sanghamitra Mohanty, Jackson J Liang, Suraj Kapa, Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia, Frank Bogun, William G Stevenson, Claudio Tondo, Konstantinos C Siontis, Harikrishna Tandri, Pasquale Santangeli, Andrea Natale, Michela Casella","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in cardiac amyloidosis is uncommon, and the substrate and outcomes of catheter ablation are not defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 22 consecutive patients (mean age, 68±10 years; male sex, 91%) with cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR [transthyretin], n=16; light chain, n=6) undergoing catheter ablation for VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF) between 2013 and 2023 in a retrospective, observational, international study. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VT/VF during follow-up, while the primary safety end point included major procedure-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The indication for ablation was drug-refractory VT in 17 patients (77%), and premature ventricular complex-initiated polymorphic VT/VF in 5 patients (23%). Catheter ablation was performed using endocardial (n=17.77%) or endo-epicardial approaches (n=5.23%). Complete endocardial electroanatomical voltage maps of the left and right ventricles were obtained in 17 (77%) and 10 (45%) patients, respectively. Each patient had evidence of low-voltage areas, most commonly involving the interventricular septum (n=16); late potentials were recorded in 16 patients (73%). A median of 1 (1-2) VT was inducible per patient; 12 of the 26 mappable VTs (46%) originated from the interventricular septum. Complete procedural success was achieved in 16 patients (73%), with 4 (18%) major procedure-related adverse events. After a median follow-up of 32 (14-42) months, sustained VT/VF recurrence was observed in 9 patients (41%); survival free from VT/VF recurrence was 56% (95% CI, 36%-86%) at 36-month follow-up, and most patients remained on antiarrhythmic drugs. A significant reduction in per patient implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies was noted in the 6-month period after ablation (before: 6 [4-9] versus after: 0 [0-0]; <i>P</i><0.001). In multivariable analysis, complete procedural success was associated with reduced risk of recurrent VT/VF (hazard ratio, 0.002; <i>P</i>=0.034).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Catheter ablation can achieve control of recurrent VT/VF in more than half of patients with cardiac amyloidosis, and the reduction in VT/VF burden post-ablation may be relevant for quality of life. Septal substrate and risk of procedure-related complications challenge successful management of patients with cardiac amyloidosis and VT/VF.</p>","PeriodicalId":10319,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"e012788"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012788","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in cardiac amyloidosis is uncommon, and the substrate and outcomes of catheter ablation are not defined.

Methods: We included 22 consecutive patients (mean age, 68±10 years; male sex, 91%) with cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR [transthyretin], n=16; light chain, n=6) undergoing catheter ablation for VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF) between 2013 and 2023 in a retrospective, observational, international study. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VT/VF during follow-up, while the primary safety end point included major procedure-related adverse events.

Results: The indication for ablation was drug-refractory VT in 17 patients (77%), and premature ventricular complex-initiated polymorphic VT/VF in 5 patients (23%). Catheter ablation was performed using endocardial (n=17.77%) or endo-epicardial approaches (n=5.23%). Complete endocardial electroanatomical voltage maps of the left and right ventricles were obtained in 17 (77%) and 10 (45%) patients, respectively. Each patient had evidence of low-voltage areas, most commonly involving the interventricular septum (n=16); late potentials were recorded in 16 patients (73%). A median of 1 (1-2) VT was inducible per patient; 12 of the 26 mappable VTs (46%) originated from the interventricular septum. Complete procedural success was achieved in 16 patients (73%), with 4 (18%) major procedure-related adverse events. After a median follow-up of 32 (14-42) months, sustained VT/VF recurrence was observed in 9 patients (41%); survival free from VT/VF recurrence was 56% (95% CI, 36%-86%) at 36-month follow-up, and most patients remained on antiarrhythmic drugs. A significant reduction in per patient implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies was noted in the 6-month period after ablation (before: 6 [4-9] versus after: 0 [0-0]; P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, complete procedural success was associated with reduced risk of recurrent VT/VF (hazard ratio, 0.002; P=0.034).

Conclusions: Catheter ablation can achieve control of recurrent VT/VF in more than half of patients with cardiac amyloidosis, and the reduction in VT/VF burden post-ablation may be relevant for quality of life. Septal substrate and risk of procedure-related complications challenge successful management of patients with cardiac amyloidosis and VT/VF.

淀粉样心肌病室性心动过速消融的基质特征和疗效:一项多中心研究
背景:心脏淀粉样变性中的持续性室性心动过速(VT)并不常见,导管消融的基质和结果尚未明确:我们在一项回顾性、观察性国际研究中纳入了 2013 年至 2023 年间因 VT/室颤(VF)接受导管消融术的 22 例连续性心脏淀粉样变性患者(平均年龄为 68±10 岁,男性占 91%)(ATTR [转甲状腺素],16 例;轻链,6 例)。主要疗效结局是随访期间复发的VT/VF,而主要安全性终点包括与手术相关的主要不良事件:17例患者(77%)的消融指征为药物难治性VT,5例患者(23%)的消融指征为室性早搏引发的多形性VT/VF。导管消融采用心内膜方法(17.77%)或心外膜方法(5.23%)。分别有 17 名(77%)和 10 名(45%)患者获得了左心室和右心室的完整心内膜电解剖电压图。每名患者都有低电压区的证据,最常见的是室间隔(16 人);16 名患者(73%)记录到了晚电位。每位患者可诱发的 VT 中位数为 1(1-2)个;26 个可诱发 VT 中的 12 个(46%)源自室间隔。16名患者(73%)获得了完全的手术成功,4名患者(18%)发生了与手术相关的重大不良事件。中位随访 32(14-42)个月后,9 名患者(41%)出现持续的 VT/VF 复发;随访 36 个月后,VT/VF 复发的存活率为 56%(95% CI,36%-86%),大多数患者仍在服用抗心律失常药物。在消融术后的 6 个月内,每位患者使用植入式心律转复除颤器的次数明显减少(消融术前:6 [4-9] 次,消融术后:0 [0-0] 次;PP=0.034):结论:导管消融可控制半数以上心脏淀粉样变性患者的复发性 VT/VF ,消融后 VT/VF 负荷的减少可能与生活质量有关。房间隔基底和手术相关并发症的风险是成功治疗心脏淀粉样变性和VT/VF患者的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology is a journal dedicated to the study and application of clinical cardiac electrophysiology. It covers a wide range of topics including the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, as well as research in this field. The journal accepts various types of studies, including observational research, clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and advancements in translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信