Utilisation and outcomes of a mobile (ambulance and air transport) venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) program in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic - a retrospective, two-centres, case-series study.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Elżbieta Rypulak, Marta Szczukocka, Tomasz Czarnik
{"title":"Utilisation and outcomes of a mobile (ambulance and air transport) venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) program in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic - a retrospective, two-centres, case-series study.","authors":"Elżbieta Rypulak, Marta Szczukocka, Tomasz Czarnik","doi":"10.5114/ait.2024.139526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many patients required mechanical ventilation support due to severe COVID-19 pneumonia. A significant proportion of mechanically ventilated patients also required venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) due to refractory hypoxemia. A high demand for VV-ECMO support during the pandemic was challenging due to many factors, including limited resources and lack of established transfer protocols. This study aims to present the organisation and outcomes of a mobile VV-ECMO program in two high-volume centres in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective, two-centre case series study, which lasted 36 months, was conducted between March 10, 2020, and January 31, 2023. The data of all patients transferred using venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) were analysed, including five women in the perinatal period with severe respiratory failure attri-buted to the COVID-19 virus. The analysis encompassed baseline patient demographics, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, admission laboratory parameters, ECMO therapy, duration of mechanical ventilation, and patient survival to ICU discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed 86 patients who met the ELSO inclusion criteria and were transported during VV-ECMO support. Mortality in the analysed group was high (80.3%). Despite high mortality, VV-ECMO appeared to be a safe procedure in COVID-19 patients with severe ARDS. No complications were noted in more than half of the analysed procedures. Despite the above, many severe complications were observed, including stroke or cerebral haemorrhage (9.8%) and limb or gut ischemia (1.6%). The most common problems co-existing with VV-ECMO treatment were bleeding complications (34.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ICU mortality rate among patients requiring VV-ECMO for COVID-19 in high-volume ECMO centres was high but not associated with the type of transportation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11284578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2024.139526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Many patients required mechanical ventilation support due to severe COVID-19 pneumonia. A significant proportion of mechanically ventilated patients also required venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) due to refractory hypoxemia. A high demand for VV-ECMO support during the pandemic was challenging due to many factors, including limited resources and lack of established transfer protocols. This study aims to present the organisation and outcomes of a mobile VV-ECMO program in two high-volume centres in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Material and methods: This retrospective, two-centre case series study, which lasted 36 months, was conducted between March 10, 2020, and January 31, 2023. The data of all patients transferred using venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) were analysed, including five women in the perinatal period with severe respiratory failure attri-buted to the COVID-19 virus. The analysis encompassed baseline patient demographics, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, admission laboratory parameters, ECMO therapy, duration of mechanical ventilation, and patient survival to ICU discharge.

Results: We assessed 86 patients who met the ELSO inclusion criteria and were transported during VV-ECMO support. Mortality in the analysed group was high (80.3%). Despite high mortality, VV-ECMO appeared to be a safe procedure in COVID-19 patients with severe ARDS. No complications were noted in more than half of the analysed procedures. Despite the above, many severe complications were observed, including stroke or cerebral haemorrhage (9.8%) and limb or gut ischemia (1.6%). The most common problems co-existing with VV-ECMO treatment were bleeding complications (34.4%).

Conclusions: The ICU mortality rate among patients requiring VV-ECMO for COVID-19 in high-volume ECMO centres was high but not associated with the type of transportation.

COVID-19大流行期间波兰静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV-ECMO)移动项目(救护车和空中运输)的使用情况和结果--一项回顾性、双中心、病例系列研究。
简介许多患者因严重的 COVID-19 肺炎而需要机械通气支持。由于难治性低氧血症,相当一部分机械通气患者还需要静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV-ECMO)。由于资源有限和缺乏既定的转运协议等诸多因素,大流行期间对静脉体外膜肺氧合支持的高需求具有挑战性。本研究旨在介绍 COVID-19 大流行期间波兰两家高流量中心的移动 VV-ECMO 项目的组织情况和成果:这项回顾性、双中心病例系列研究在 2020 年 3 月 10 日至 2023 年 1 月 31 日期间进行,历时 36 个月。研究分析了使用静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV-ECMO)转运的所有患者的数据,其中包括五名围产期因 COVID-19 病毒导致严重呼吸衰竭的产妇。分析内容包括患者基线人口统计学特征、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、入院实验室参数、ECMO治疗、机械通气持续时间以及患者出ICU后的存活率:我们对符合 ELSO 纳入标准并在 VV-ECMO 支持期间转运的 86 名患者进行了评估。分析组的死亡率很高(80.3%)。尽管死亡率很高,但在COVID-19重症ARDS患者中,VV-ECMO似乎是一种安全的治疗方法。在超过一半的分析过程中未发现并发症。尽管如此,仍观察到许多严重并发症,包括中风或脑出血(9.8%)和肢体或肠道缺血(1.6%)。VV-ECMO治疗中最常见的问题是出血并发症(34.4%):结论:在高容量 ECMO 中心,需要 VV-ECMO 治疗 COVID-19 的患者的 ICU 死亡率较高,但与转运类型无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信