Exploring post-registration nursing students' perceptions and learning experiences of peer-led simulation: A qualitative study

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Fang Huang, Karen Lai See Tham, Emily Wai Yee Kwan
{"title":"Exploring post-registration nursing students' perceptions and learning experiences of peer-led simulation: A qualitative study","authors":"Fang Huang,&nbsp;Karen Lai See Tham,&nbsp;Emily Wai Yee Kwan","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In nursing education, often dominated by instructor-led simulations (ILS), there is a growing demand to explore alternative approaches, such as peer-led simulation (PLS), in the training of post-registration nursing students. PLS shifts learners into leadership roles, fostering scenario design and facilitation among peers. Despite existing literature on ILS versus PLS, there remains a gap in the effectiveness of combined PLS and ILS for post-registration nursing students. This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the learning experience of post-registration nursing students and their perceptions of PLS as an instructional strategy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This qualitative study was implemented from October 2022 to April 2023. The entire student cohorts (<em>n</em> = 20) were recruited from the Advanced Diploma in Nursing (Peri-anaesthesia) programme. The students underwent both ILS (14h) and PLS (11h) as part of the mandatory activities within a 60-h module on “Crisis Management in Anaesthesia”. Three semi-structured focus group discussions (FGDs) with 16 participants were conducted. The FGDs were guided by six questions on students learning experiences that were validated using the Delphi method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The thematic analysis revealed four major themes concerning their learning experiences: the learning journey, enablers, barriers and perceived benefits of including PLS. Among the enablers, one notable finding was learners' appreciation for their ability to apply evidence-based practice (EBP) principles, which played a significant role in achieving conceptual fidelity in their developed scenarios.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The qualitative findings underscore the importance of PLS in fostering dynamic learning environments, vital for educators across disciplines. By actively participating in scenario design and facilitation, students enhance their understanding of theoretical concepts and clinical competency. PLS implementation provides insights into students' learning needs and challenges, benefiting educators in refining teaching strategies and enhancing educational effectiveness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 106354"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724002648","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In nursing education, often dominated by instructor-led simulations (ILS), there is a growing demand to explore alternative approaches, such as peer-led simulation (PLS), in the training of post-registration nursing students. PLS shifts learners into leadership roles, fostering scenario design and facilitation among peers. Despite existing literature on ILS versus PLS, there remains a gap in the effectiveness of combined PLS and ILS for post-registration nursing students. This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the learning experience of post-registration nursing students and their perceptions of PLS as an instructional strategy.

Methods

This qualitative study was implemented from October 2022 to April 2023. The entire student cohorts (n = 20) were recruited from the Advanced Diploma in Nursing (Peri-anaesthesia) programme. The students underwent both ILS (14h) and PLS (11h) as part of the mandatory activities within a 60-h module on “Crisis Management in Anaesthesia”. Three semi-structured focus group discussions (FGDs) with 16 participants were conducted. The FGDs were guided by six questions on students learning experiences that were validated using the Delphi method.

Results

The thematic analysis revealed four major themes concerning their learning experiences: the learning journey, enablers, barriers and perceived benefits of including PLS. Among the enablers, one notable finding was learners' appreciation for their ability to apply evidence-based practice (EBP) principles, which played a significant role in achieving conceptual fidelity in their developed scenarios.

Conclusion

The qualitative findings underscore the importance of PLS in fostering dynamic learning environments, vital for educators across disciplines. By actively participating in scenario design and facilitation, students enhance their understanding of theoretical concepts and clinical competency. PLS implementation provides insights into students' learning needs and challenges, benefiting educators in refining teaching strategies and enhancing educational effectiveness.

探索注册后护理专业学生对同伴引导模拟的看法和学习经验:定性研究
背景在护理教育中,教师主导的模拟教学(ILS)往往占据主导地位,而在注册后护理专业学生的培训中,探索同伴主导的模拟教学(PLS)等替代方法的需求日益增长。同伴主导模拟将学习者转变为领导者,促进同伴之间的情景设计和协助。尽管已有文献对 ILS 与 PLS 进行了比较,但对于注册后护理专业学生而言,将 PLS 与 ILS 结合使用的有效性仍是一个空白。本研究旨在调查影响注册后护理专业学生学习体验的因素,以及他们对 PLS 作为一种教学策略的看法。所有学生(n = 20)均从护理学高级文凭(围麻醉期)课程中招募。作为60小时 "麻醉危机管理 "模块的必修活动之一,学生们参加了ILS(14小时)和PLS(11小时)。进行了三次半结构化焦点小组讨论(FGD),共有 16 人参加。专题分析揭示了与学生学习经历有关的四大主题:学习历程、促进因素、障碍和包含 PLS 的感知收益。在促进因素中,一个值得注意的发现是学习者对他们应用循证实践(EBP)原则的能力的赞赏,这在他们开发的情景模拟中实现概念忠实性方面发挥了重要作用。通过积极参与情景设计和引导,学生们加深了对理论概念和临床能力的理解。PLS 的实施有助于深入了解学生的学习需求和面临的挑战,有利于教育工作者改进教学策略和提高教育效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信