Disparities in postdischarge follow-up and risk of readmission between Medicaid and privately insured patients

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Elizabeth Boggs MD, MS, Gregory Misky MD, Sharon Scarbro MS, Mark Gritz PhD, Renuka Tipirneni MD, MSc, Richard Lindrooth PhD
{"title":"Disparities in postdischarge follow-up and risk of readmission between Medicaid and privately insured patients","authors":"Elizabeth Boggs MD, MS,&nbsp;Gregory Misky MD,&nbsp;Sharon Scarbro MS,&nbsp;Mark Gritz PhD,&nbsp;Renuka Tipirneni MD, MSc,&nbsp;Richard Lindrooth PhD","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Studies have identified higher risk of readmission for patients with Medicaid compared to those with private insurance. Postdischarge follow-up is utilized as an intervention to reduce readmissions in the Medicare population, but it is unclear whether follow-up reduces risk of readmission for patients with Medicaid.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess whether follow-up within 30 days of discharge reduces risk of readmission and mitigates readmission disparities based upon insurance status.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective cohort study used Cox proportional hazard and competing risk models to estimate associations between sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, follow-up, and readmission.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n <p>We analyzed data from 4281 patients aged 21–64 years with Medicaid or private insurance who were hospitalized from January 2017 to December 2019 for one of five conditions associated with high risk of readmission.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n <p>Outpatient follow-up within 30 days of discharge and 30-day all-cause readmission were outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall risk of readmission was similar for Medicaid and privately insured patients in this cohort (13.7% and 14.5%, respectively). Patients with Medicaid were 23% points less likely to complete outpatient follow-up within 30 days compared to patients with private insurance (<i>p</i> &lt; .001). However, outpatient follow-up before readmission within 30 days of discharge was not associated with a significant difference in readmission rate (hazard ratio: 1.10, 95% confidence interval: 0.91–1.32) in the overall sample or in analysis stratified by payer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We found similar rates of readmission for Medicaid and privately insured patients despite significant disparities in postdischarge follow-up. Timely follow-up care alone may not be sufficient as an intervention to reduce readmissions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"20 3","pages":"219-228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13486","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Studies have identified higher risk of readmission for patients with Medicaid compared to those with private insurance. Postdischarge follow-up is utilized as an intervention to reduce readmissions in the Medicare population, but it is unclear whether follow-up reduces risk of readmission for patients with Medicaid.

Objective

To assess whether follow-up within 30 days of discharge reduces risk of readmission and mitigates readmission disparities based upon insurance status.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used Cox proportional hazard and competing risk models to estimate associations between sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, follow-up, and readmission.

We analyzed data from 4281 patients aged 21–64 years with Medicaid or private insurance who were hospitalized from January 2017 to December 2019 for one of five conditions associated with high risk of readmission.

Outpatient follow-up within 30 days of discharge and 30-day all-cause readmission were outcomes.

Results

Overall risk of readmission was similar for Medicaid and privately insured patients in this cohort (13.7% and 14.5%, respectively). Patients with Medicaid were 23% points less likely to complete outpatient follow-up within 30 days compared to patients with private insurance (p < .001). However, outpatient follow-up before readmission within 30 days of discharge was not associated with a significant difference in readmission rate (hazard ratio: 1.10, 95% confidence interval: 0.91–1.32) in the overall sample or in analysis stratified by payer.

Conclusions

We found similar rates of readmission for Medicaid and privately insured patients despite significant disparities in postdischarge follow-up. Timely follow-up care alone may not be sufficient as an intervention to reduce readmissions.

Abstract Image

医疗补助和私人保险患者在出院后随访和再入院风险方面的差异。
背景:研究发现,与私人保险患者相比,医疗补助患者的再入院风险更高。出院后随访被用作减少医疗保险人群再入院率的干预措施,但目前还不清楚随访是否能降低医疗补助患者的再入院风险:目的: 评估出院后 30 天内的随访是否能降低再入院风险,并减少因保险状况而导致的再入院差异:这项回顾性队列研究采用 Cox 比例危险模型和竞争风险模型来估计社会人口学和临床特征、随访和再入院之间的关系。我们分析了 4281 名年龄在 21-64 岁之间、有医疗补助或私人保险的患者的数据,这些患者在 2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间因五种与再入院高风险相关的疾病之一住院。结果显示,出院后30天内的门诊随访和30天内的全因再入院率:在该队列中,医疗补助和私人保险患者的再入院总体风险相似(分别为 13.7% 和 14.5%)。与私人保险患者相比,医疗补助患者在 30 天内完成门诊随访的可能性要低 23 个百分点(p 结论:我们发现,医疗补助患者的再入院率与私人保险患者相似:我们发现,尽管医疗补助和私人保险患者在出院后随访方面存在显著差异,但他们的再入院率相似。仅靠及时的随访护理可能不足以减少再入院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of hospital medicine
Journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JHM is a peer-reviewed publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine and is published 12 times per year. JHM publishes manuscripts that address the care of hospitalized adults or children. Broad areas of interest include (1) Treatments for common inpatient conditions; (2) Approaches to improving perioperative care; (3) Improving care for hospitalized patients with geriatric or pediatric vulnerabilities (such as mobility problems, or those with complex longitudinal care); (4) Evaluation of innovative healthcare delivery or educational models; (5) Approaches to improving the quality, safety, and value of healthcare across the acute- and postacute-continuum of care; and (6) Evaluation of policy and payment changes that affect hospital and postacute care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信