Evaluating interventions that have improved access to community mental health care for Black men: A systematic review.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Daniel W Stockwell, Moïse Roche, Jo Billings
{"title":"Evaluating interventions that have improved access to community mental health care for Black men: A systematic review.","authors":"Daniel W Stockwell, Moïse Roche, Jo Billings","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2024.2390381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black men are one of the most disadvantaged groups when accessing mental health services in the UK. There is extensive guidance from qualitative research on how to bring equity, but it is unclear how this evidence is being implemented.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To systematically review interventions that help Black men access timely and appropriate mental health care and to explore their nature and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022345323). We searched electronic databases up to September 2023 for studies with at least 50% of Black male participants receiving an intervention to improve access to mental health support in community settings. We conducted a narrative synthesis of eligible studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies met our inclusion criteria. An important characteristic was discussing thoughts and feelings through peer support, leading to a normalization of experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a paucity of research into interventions that support Black men accessing community mental health support. Proactively testing interventions, not just seeking qualitative feedback, is required. Evidence-based strategies to support recruitment of Black men into research is necessary. Commissioners could consider evidence typically seen as less robust to mitigate against an underlying racial bias within research and stimulate the growth of an evidence base.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2390381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Black men are one of the most disadvantaged groups when accessing mental health services in the UK. There is extensive guidance from qualitative research on how to bring equity, but it is unclear how this evidence is being implemented.

Aim: To systematically review interventions that help Black men access timely and appropriate mental health care and to explore their nature and effectiveness.

Method: We registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022345323). We searched electronic databases up to September 2023 for studies with at least 50% of Black male participants receiving an intervention to improve access to mental health support in community settings. We conducted a narrative synthesis of eligible studies.

Results: Five studies met our inclusion criteria. An important characteristic was discussing thoughts and feelings through peer support, leading to a normalization of experiences.

Conclusions: There is a paucity of research into interventions that support Black men accessing community mental health support. Proactively testing interventions, not just seeking qualitative feedback, is required. Evidence-based strategies to support recruitment of Black men into research is necessary. Commissioners could consider evidence typically seen as less robust to mitigate against an underlying racial bias within research and stimulate the growth of an evidence base.

评估改善黑人男性获得社区心理健康护理的干预措施:系统回顾。
背景:在英国,黑人男性是获得心理健康服务最不利的群体之一。目的:系统回顾帮助黑人男性及时获得适当心理健康护理的干预措施,并探讨其性质和有效性:我们在 PROSPERO(CRD42022345323)上进行了注册。我们在电子数据库中检索了截至 2023 年 9 月的研究,这些研究中至少有 50% 的黑人男性参与者接受了干预措施,以改善在社区环境中获得心理健康支持的机会。我们对符合条件的研究进行了叙述性综合:结果:五项研究符合我们的纳入标准。其中一个重要特点是通过同伴支持讨论思想和感受,从而使经历正常化:有关支持黑人男性获得社区心理健康支持的干预措施的研究很少。需要积极主动地测试干预措施,而不仅仅是寻求定性反馈。有必要制定基于证据的策略,支持招募黑人男性参与研究。委员们可以考虑通常被视为不太可靠的证据,以减少研究中潜在的种族偏见,促进证据基础的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信