Economic evaluations of eHealth interventions targeting mental health problems in the workplace: a systematic review.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Stijn B Peeters, Merel Hilgersom, Frédérique C W van Krugten, Beatriz Olaya, Josep M Haro, Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis, Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen
{"title":"Economic evaluations of eHealth interventions targeting mental health problems in the workplace: a systematic review.","authors":"Stijn B Peeters, Merel Hilgersom, Frédérique C W van Krugten, Beatriz Olaya, Josep M Haro, Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis, Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2024.2390371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Work-related mental health problems impose significant economic and personal burdens. eHealth interventions may offer low-cost, practical solutions, but guidance on their cost-effectiveness in workplace mental health is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to systematically review economic evaluations of workplace eHealth interventions for mental health, offering insights into methodologies and cost-effectiveness outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, searches were conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, PsycInfo and EconLit databases in May 2022, selecting peer-reviewed papers that performed economic evaluations on workplace eHealth interventions for adult mental health. Quality was assessed using the Drummond checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 3213 references, eight met the inclusion criteria. These studies varied in economic perspective, types of economic analysis type, primary outcome measures, intervention focus (e.g. stress, alcohol, insomnia & return-to-work) and direct non-medical costs. Five eHealth interventions were found to be cost-effective and/or have a positive return on investment, with seven studies rated as high quality according to the Drummond checklist.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study outcomes unveiled the potential cost-effectiveness of eHealth interventions targeting mental health issues, particularly these focusing on workplace stress. However, generalization is challenging due to variations in the methodologies across studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2390371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Work-related mental health problems impose significant economic and personal burdens. eHealth interventions may offer low-cost, practical solutions, but guidance on their cost-effectiveness in workplace mental health is limited.

Objective: The objective of this study was to systematically review economic evaluations of workplace eHealth interventions for mental health, offering insights into methodologies and cost-effectiveness outcomes.

Methods: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, searches were conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, PsycInfo and EconLit databases in May 2022, selecting peer-reviewed papers that performed economic evaluations on workplace eHealth interventions for adult mental health. Quality was assessed using the Drummond checklist.

Results: From 3213 references, eight met the inclusion criteria. These studies varied in economic perspective, types of economic analysis type, primary outcome measures, intervention focus (e.g. stress, alcohol, insomnia & return-to-work) and direct non-medical costs. Five eHealth interventions were found to be cost-effective and/or have a positive return on investment, with seven studies rated as high quality according to the Drummond checklist.

Conclusions: The study outcomes unveiled the potential cost-effectiveness of eHealth interventions targeting mental health issues, particularly these focusing on workplace stress. However, generalization is challenging due to variations in the methodologies across studies.

针对工作场所心理健康问题的电子健康干预措施的经济评估:系统综述。
背景:与工作相关的心理健康问题造成了巨大的经济和个人负担:与工作相关的心理健康问题造成了巨大的经济和个人负担。电子健康干预措施可以提供低成本、实用的解决方案,但有关其在工作场所心理健康方面的成本效益的指导却很有限:本研究旨在系统回顾工作场所心理健康电子保健干预措施的经济评估,提供有关方法和成本效益结果的见解:根据 PRISMA 准则,于 2022 年 5 月在 Embase、MEDLINE、Web of Science、Google Scholar、Cochrane library、PsycInfo 和 EconLit 数据库中进行了检索,筛选出针对成人心理健康的工作场所电子健康干预措施进行经济评估的同行评审论文。采用德拉蒙德核对表对论文质量进行评估:从 3213 篇参考文献中,有 8 篇符合纳入标准。这些研究在经济视角、经济分析类型、主要结果测量、干预重点(如压力、酒精、失眠和重返工作岗位)和直接非医疗成本方面各不相同。研究发现,五项电子健康干预措施具有成本效益和/或积极的投资回报,其中七项研究根据德拉蒙德核对表被评为高质量:研究结果揭示了针对心理健康问题的电子健康干预措施的潜在成本效益,尤其是针对工作场所压力的干预措施。然而,由于不同研究的方法存在差异,因此推广具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信