Hospital nurse managers' perspectives of the Magnet Recognition Program using an importance-performance analysis: A quantitative cross-sectional study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70015
Eunha Ryoo, Seok Hee Jeong, Na Yeon Shin, Soyoung Yu
{"title":"Hospital nurse managers' perspectives of the Magnet Recognition Program using an importance-performance analysis: A quantitative cross-sectional study.","authors":"Eunha Ryoo, Seok Hee Jeong, Na Yeon Shin, Soyoung Yu","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the perspectives of nursing managers in Korean hospitals on the Magnet Recognition Program using importance-performance analysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive quantitative cross-sectional design with a survey methodology was used to evaluate nursing managers' perceptions of the Magnet Recognition Program criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After the Magnet Recognition Program's content validity was confirmed, an online survey was administered to 150 nursing managers from 10 hospitals. The results were analysed using importance-performance analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average importance of the questionnaire for the developed Magnet Recognition Program criteria was 3.19 ± 135 and the performance was 2.90 ± 222. Items corresponding to the areas 'Concentrate here', 'Keep up the good work', 'Possible overkill' and 'Low priority' were identified using two importance-performance analysis frames. The items corresponding to 'Concentrate here' included evidence-based nursing practice, the nursing professional practice model, nurses' participation in improving turnover rate and cases of innovation in nursing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights areas for improvement within the Magnet Recognition Program as perceived by Korean nursing managers, emphasizing evidence-based practice, professional models and nurses' involvement in turnover reduction and fostering innovation.</p><p><strong>Public contribution: </strong>To achieve Magnet recognition, hospitals must understand nursing managers' perspectives on the Magnet Recognition Program criteria. This study provides insights into enhancing the work environment for nurses in South Korean hospitals and lays the groundwork for developing effective Magnet certification programs. Introducing the Magnet program into South Korean hospitals may improve the overall nursing work environment and mitigate the serious problem of nursing staff turnover.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The findings were reported using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"11 8","pages":"e70015"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11336375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To explore the perspectives of nursing managers in Korean hospitals on the Magnet Recognition Program using importance-performance analysis.

Design: A descriptive quantitative cross-sectional design with a survey methodology was used to evaluate nursing managers' perceptions of the Magnet Recognition Program criteria.

Methods: After the Magnet Recognition Program's content validity was confirmed, an online survey was administered to 150 nursing managers from 10 hospitals. The results were analysed using importance-performance analysis.

Results: The average importance of the questionnaire for the developed Magnet Recognition Program criteria was 3.19 ± 135 and the performance was 2.90 ± 222. Items corresponding to the areas 'Concentrate here', 'Keep up the good work', 'Possible overkill' and 'Low priority' were identified using two importance-performance analysis frames. The items corresponding to 'Concentrate here' included evidence-based nursing practice, the nursing professional practice model, nurses' participation in improving turnover rate and cases of innovation in nursing.

Conclusion: This study highlights areas for improvement within the Magnet Recognition Program as perceived by Korean nursing managers, emphasizing evidence-based practice, professional models and nurses' involvement in turnover reduction and fostering innovation.

Public contribution: To achieve Magnet recognition, hospitals must understand nursing managers' perspectives on the Magnet Recognition Program criteria. This study provides insights into enhancing the work environment for nurses in South Korean hospitals and lays the groundwork for developing effective Magnet certification programs. Introducing the Magnet program into South Korean hospitals may improve the overall nursing work environment and mitigate the serious problem of nursing staff turnover.

Reporting method: The findings were reported using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist.

使用重要性-绩效分析法分析医院护士长对 "磁石认可计划 "的看法:横断面定量研究。
目的:采用重要性-绩效分析法探讨韩国医院护理管理者对磁石认可计划的看法:采用描述性定量横断面设计和调查方法,评估护理管理者对磁石认可计划标准的看法:在确认了磁性认可计划的内容有效性后,对来自 10 家医院的 150 名护理经理进行了在线调查。采用重要性-绩效分析法对调查结果进行分析:结果:对于已制定的 "磁石认可计划 "标准,问卷的平均重要性为 3.19 ± 135,绩效为 2.90 ± 222。通过两个重要性-绩效分析框架,确定了与 "集中于此"、"继续努力"、"可能矫枉过正 "和 "低优先级 "相对应的项目。与 "专注于此 "相对应的项目包括循证护理实践、护理专业实践模式、护士参与改善更替率和护理创新案例:本研究强调了韩国护理管理者认为的磁石认可计划中需要改进的地方,强调了循证实践、专业模式以及护士参与降低更替率和促进创新:要获得磁石认可,医院必须了解护理管理者对磁石认可计划标准的看法。本研究为改善韩国医院护士的工作环境提供了见解,并为制定有效的磁石认证计划奠定了基础。将磁石计划引入韩国医院可改善整体护理工作环境,缓解护理人员流失的严重问题:研究结果采用加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)核对表进行报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信